Cited by 144Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsCerebrovascular and genetic disordersFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Selective effects of aging on brain white matter microstructure: a diffusion tensor imaging tractography study

Michielse, Stijn, Coupland, Nick, Camicioli, Richard, Carter, Rawle, Seres, Peter, Sabino, Jennifer, Malykhin, Nikolai·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

We examined age-related changes in the cerebral white matter. Structural magnetic resonance images (MRIs) and diffusion tensor images (DTIs) were acquired from 69 healthy subjects aged 22-84 years. Quantitative DTI tractography was performed for nine different white matter tracts to determine tract volume, fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial, and radial diffusivities. We used automated and manual segmentation to determine volumes of gray matter (GM), white mater (WM), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and intracranial space. The results showed significant effects of aging on WM, GM, CSF volumes, and selective effects of aging on structural integrity of different white matter tracts. WM of the prefrontal region was the most vulnerable to aging, while temporal lobe connections, cingulum, and parieto-occipital commissural connections showed relative preservation with age. This study was cross-sectional, and therefore, additional longitudinal studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.019

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In participants aged 22-84 years, FA values of the corpus callosum declined with aging only in the genu part, not in the body and splenium parts.

    “FA values of the corpus callosum declined with aging only in the genu part while not in the body and splenium parts in participants aged 22–84 years (Michielse et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michielse, S., Coupland, N., Camicioli, R., Carter, R., Seres, P., Sabino, J., & Malykhin, N.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Malykhin, Nikolai
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
1190-1201
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154288487
Cited by
144
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
brain aging, white matter microstructure, white matter tracts, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, axial and radial diffusivity, tract volume, prefrontal white matter, cingulum, corpus callosum, gray matter volume, cerebrospinal fluid volume, intracranial space
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review