The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data
Open accessAbstract
Increasing interest in understanding dynamic interactions of brain neural networks leads to formulation of sophisticated connectivity analysis methods. Recent studies have applied Granger causality based on standard multivariate autoregressive (MAR) modeling to assess the brain connectivity. Nevertheless, one important flaw of this commonly proposed method is that it requires the analyzed time series to be stationary, whereas such assumption is mostly violated due to the weakly nonstationary nature of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series. Therefore, we propose an approach to dynamic Granger causality in the frequency domain for evaluating functional network connectivity in fMRI data. The effectiveness and robustness of the dynamic approach was significantly improved by combining a forward and backward Kalman filter that improved estimates compared to the standard time-invariant MAR modeling. In our method, the functional networks were first detected by independent component analysis (ICA), a computational method for separating a multivariate signal into maximally independent components. Then the measure of Granger causality was evaluated using generalized partial directed coherence that is suitable for bivariate as well as multivariate data. Moreover, this metric provides identification of causal relation in frequency domain, which allows one to distinguish the frequency components related to the experimental paradigm. The procedure of evaluating Granger causality via dynamic MAR was demonstrated on simulated time series as well as on two sets of group fMRI data collected during an auditory sensorimotor (SM) or auditory oddball discrimination (AOD) tasks. Finally, a comparison with the results obtained from a standard time-invariant MAR model was provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although we have illustrated the approach using region specific summaries of fMRI data from an activation study, there is no reason why exactly the same approach could not be applied to the activity of distributed modes, such as those from principal or independent component analysis (cf, Havlicek et al., 2010).”
From Network discovery with DCM (2011) · cites this paper as Havlicek et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Haykin, S. (1986) · Cited by 12,603
Rogers, S. (1996) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/0967-0661(96)82838-3 · Cited by 10,013
An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis
Lütkepohl, H. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-27752-1 · Cited by 5,972
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis
Calhoun, V. D., Adali, T., Pearlson, G. D., & Pekar, J. J. (2001) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1048 · Cited by 2,994
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review
Friston, K. J. (2011) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0008 · Cited by 3,415
Network modelling methods for FMRI
Smith, S. M., Miller, K. L., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Webster, M., Beckmann, C. F., Nichols, T. E., Ramsey, J. D., & Woolrich, M. W. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063 · Cited by 1,878
Effective connectivity: Influence, causality and biophysical modeling
Valdes-Sosa, P. A., Roebroeck, A. F., Jean Daunizeau, A., & Friston, K. J. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.058 · Cited by 399
Friston, K. J., Li, B., Daunizeau, J., & Stephan, K. E. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.039 · Cited by 283
Wu, G., Liao, W., Stramaglia, S., Ding, J.-R., Chen, H., & Marinazzo, D. (2013) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2013.01.003 · Cited by 283
Granger causality for state-space models
Barnett, L., & Seth, A. K. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.040101 · Cited by 208
Classification of schizophrenia patients based on resting-state functional network connectivity
Arbabshirani, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., Pearlson, G. D., & Calhoun, V. D. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00133 · Cited by 183
Self-citationCausal inference with multiple time series: principles and problems
Eichler, M. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0613 · Cited by 136
Dynamic brain connectivity is a better predictor of PTSD than static connectivity
Jin, C., Jia, H., Lanka, P., Rangaprakash, D., Li, L., Liu, T., Hu, X. P., & Deshpande, G. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23676 · Cited by 135
Functional network connectivity during rest and task conditions: A comparative study
Arbabshirani, M. R., Havlíček, M., Kiehl, K. A., Pearlson, G. D., & Calhoun, V. D. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22118 · Cited by 120
Self-citationA short history of causal modeling of fMRI data
Stephan, K. E., & Roebroeck, A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.034 · Cited by 112
Multivariate dynamical systems models for estimating causal interactions in fMRI
Ryali, S., Supekar, K., Chen, T., & Menon, V. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.052 · Cited by 112
Extracting neuronal functional network dynamics via adaptive Granger causality analysis
Sheikhattar, A., Miran, S., Liu, J., Fritz, J. B., Shamma, S., Kanold, P. O., & Babadi, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1718154115 · Cited by 97
The Connected Brain: Causality, models, and intrinsic dynamics
Razi, A., & Friston, K. J. (2016) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2015.2482121 · Cited by 90
Dysconnectivity of neurocognitive networks at rest in very-preterm born adults
White, T. P., Symington, I., Castellanos, N. P., Brittain, P. J., Froudist‐Walsh, S., Nam, K.-W., Sato, J. R., Allin, M. P. G., Shergill, S. S., Murray, R. M., et al. (2014) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.01.005 · Cited by 88
van Mierlo, P., Carrette, E., Hallez, H., Vonck, K. E. J., Roost, D. V., Boon, P., & Staelens, S. G. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.009 · Cited by 83
Shoeibi, A., Ghassemi, N., Khodatars, M., Moridian, P., Khosravi, A., Zare, A., Górriz, J. M., Chale-Chale, A. H., Khadem, A. A., & Acharya, U. R. (2022) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-022-09897-w · Cited by 77
Bayesian models for functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis
Zhang, L., Guindani, M., & Vannucci, M. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.1339 · Cited by 72
Estimating Dynamic Connectivity States in fMRI Using Regime-Switching Factor Models
Ting, C., Ombao, H., Samdin, S. B., & Salleh, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2780185 · Cited by 72
Hagan, D. F. T., Wang, G., Liang, X. S., & Dolman, A. J. (2019) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-18-0881.1 · Cited by 72
Time, frequency, and time‐varying Granger‐causality measures in neuroscience
Cekic, S., Grandjean, D., & Renaud, O. (2018) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7621 · Cited by 71
Signal quality and Bayesian signal processing in neurofeedback based on real-time fMRI
Koush, Y., Zvyagintsev, M., Dyck, M., Mathiak, K. A., & Mathiak, K. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.076 · Cited by 62
Statistical models for brain signals with properties that evolve across trials
Ombao, H., Fiecas, M. J. A., Ting, C., & Low, Y. F. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.061 · Cited by 54
Real-time fMRI-based neurofeedback reinforces causality of attention networks
Lee, J., Kim, J., & Yoo, S. (2012) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2012.01.002 · Cited by 54
Pisapia, N. D., Turatto, M., Lin, P., Jovicich, J., & Caramazza, A. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr146 · Cited by 56
A Unified Estimation Framework for State-Related Changes in Effective Brain Connectivity
Samdin, S. B., Ting, C., Ombao, H., & Salleh, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2580738 · Cited by 52
Modeling time-varying brain networks with a self-tuning optimized Kalman filter
Pascucci, D., Rubega, M., & Plomp, G. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007566 · Cited by 52
Effective connectivity analysis of fMRI and MEG data collected under identical paradigms
Plis, S., Weisend, M. P., Damaraju, E., Eichele, T., Mayer, A., Clark, V. P., Lane, T. D. R., & Calhoun, V. D. (2011) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.04.011 · Cited by 47
Self-citationSpatio-temporal Granger causality: A new framework
Luo, Q., Lu, W., Cheng, W., Valdes-Sosa, P. A., Wen, X., Ding, M., & Feng, J. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.091 · Cited by 49
A Comprehensive Analysis of Connectivity and Aging Over the Adult Life Span
Archer, J. A., Lee, A., Qiu, A., & Chen, S. A. (2015) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2015.0345 · Cited by 49
Li, Z., Ouyang, G., Li, D., & Li, X. (2011) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.84.021929 · Cited by 42
Rangaprakash, D., Tadayonnejad, R., Deshpande, G., O’Neill, J., & Feusner, J. D. (2020) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-020-00358-8 · Cited by 44
Gaglianese, A., Costagli, M., Bernardi, G., Ricciardi, E., & Pietrini, P. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.093 · Cited by 39
Stramaglia, S., Angelini, L., Wu, G., Cortés, J. M., Faes, L., & Marinazzo, D. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2559578 · Cited by 38
Chiang, S., Guindani, M., Yeh, H. J., Haneef, Z., Stern, J. M., & Vannucci, M. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23456 · Cited by 37
Wheelock, M. D., Rangaprakash, D., Harnett, N. G., Wood, K. H., Orem, T. R., Mrug, S., Granger, D. A., Deshpande, G., & Knight, D. C. (2018) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/bne0000276 · Cited by 37
Callara, A. L., Sebastiani, L., Vanello, N., Scilingo, E. P., & Greco, A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2021.3060867 · Cited by 35
Searching Multiregression Dynamic Models of Resting-State fMRI Networks Using Integer Programming
da Costa, L. C. C., Smith, J. Q., Nichols, T. E., Cussens, J., Duff, E. P., & Makin, T. R. (2015) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/14-ba913 · Cited by 34
Robust Nonlinear Causality Analysis of Nonstationary Multivariate Physiological Time Series
Schäck, T., Muma, M., Feng, M., Guan, C., & Zoubir, A. M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2017.2708609 · Cited by 32
Switching state-space modeling of neural signal dynamics
He, M., Das, P., Hotan, G. C., & Purdon, P. L. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011395 · Cited by 27
Causal time series analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data
Roebroeck, A. F., Seth, A. K., & Valdes-Sosa, P. A. (2009) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · Cited by 27
Rodrigues, J., & Andrade, A. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.029 · Cited by 26
Protopapa, F., Siettos, C. I., Evdokimidis, I., & Smyrnis, N. (2014) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2014.00146 · Cited by 26
Smith, J. F., Pillai, A. S., Chen, K., & Horwitz, B. (2012) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00104 · Cited by 25
Wei, H., An, J., Shen, H., Zeng, L., Qiu, S., & Hu, D. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00447 · Cited by 25
Mao, J.-W., Ye, X., Li, Y.-H., Liang, P.-J., Xu, J., & Zhang, P.-M. (2016) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2016.00113 · Cited by 25
Wang, Y., Katwal, S. B., Rogers, B. P., Gore, J. C., & Deshpande, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2016.2593655 · Cited by 24
GMAC: A Matlab toolbox for spectral Granger causality analysis of fMRI data
Tana, M. G., Sclocco, R., & Bianchi, A. M. (2012) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.07.003 · Cited by 22
Youssofzadeh, V., Prasad, G., Naeem, M., & Wong‐Lin, K. (2015) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-015-9281-6 · Cited by 19
Granger causality analysis of rat cortical functional connectivity in pain
Guo, X., Zhang, Q., Singh, A., Wang, J., & Chen, Z. S. (2020) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab6cba · Cited by 18
Zhao, S., Rangaprakash, D., Venkataraman, A., Liang, P., & Deshpande, G. (2017) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00211 · Cited by 20
Frequency-based approach to the study of semantic brain networks connectivity
Bianchi, A. M., Marchetta, E., Tana, M. G., Tettamanti, M., & Rizzo, G. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.10.005 · Cited by 17
Zhang, H., Chen, H., Wang, H., Li, D., Jia, B., Tan, Z., Zheng, B., & Weng, Z. (2015) · Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jtcms.2015.10.001 · Cited by 16
New Levels of Language Processing Complexity and Organization Revealed by Granger Causation
Gow, D. W., & Caplan, D. N. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00506 · Cited by 17
The altered Granger causality connection among pain-related brain networks in migraine
Ning, Y., Zheng, R., Li, K., Zhang, Y., Lyu, D., Jia, H., Ren, Y., & Zou, Y. (2018) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000010102 · Cited by 16
Rangaprakash, D., Barry, R. L., & Deshpande, G. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.934138 · Cited by 15
Estimating Time-Dependent Structures in a Multivariate Causality for Land–Atmosphere Interactions
Zhou, F., Hagan, D. F. T., Wang, G., Liang, X. S., Li, S., Shao, Y., Yeboah, E., & Wei, X. (2024) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-23-0207.1 · Cited by 15
Shim, W. H., Baek, K., Kim, J. K., Chae, Y., Suh, J., Rosen, B. R., Jeong, J., & Kim, Y. R. (2012) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00332.2012 · Cited by 13
Li, Y., Wu, K., Hu, X., Xu, T., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., & Li, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.858833 · Cited by 13
Multi-Level Clustering of Dynamic Directional Brain Network Patterns and Their Behavioral Relevance
Deshpande, G., & Jia, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01448 · Cited by 13
Granger causality in the frequency domain: derivation and applications
Lima, V., Dellajustina, F. J., Shimoura, R. O., Girardi‐Schappo, M., Kamiji, N. L., Pena, R. F. O., & Roque, A. C. (2020) · Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física · doi:10.1590/1806-9126-rbef-2020-0007 · Cited by 13
Parcel-Based Connectivity Analysis of fMRI Data for the Study of Epileptic Seizure Propagation
Tana, M. G., Bianchi, A. M., Sclocco, R., Franchin, T., Cerutti, S., & Leal, A. (2012) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-012-0225-2 · Cited by 12
Sidulova, M., & Park, C. H. (2023) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering10101209 · Cited by 10
Network analysis of multivariate time series data in biological systems: methods and applications
Mei, H., Wang, Z., Yang, H., Li, X., & Xu, Y. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf223 · Cited by 10
How ignoring physiological noise can bias the conclusions from fMRI simulation results
Welvaert, M., & Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.08.022 · Cited by 9
Ning, Y., Li, K., Zhang, Y., Chen, P., Yin, D., Zhu, H., & Jia, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00780 · Cited by 9
Optimal stimulus scheduling for active estimation of evoked brain networks
Kafashan, M., & Ching, S. (2015) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066011 · Cited by 9
Detecting effective connectivity in networks of coupled neuronal oscillators
Boykin, E. R., Khargonekar, P. P., Carney, P. R., Ogle, W. O., & Talathi, S. S. (2011) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-011-0367-3 · Cited by 8
Studying the effective brain connectivity using multiregression dynamic models
da Costa, L. C. C., Nichols, T. E., & Smith, J. Q. (2017) · Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1214/17-bjps375 · Cited by 8
Samdin, S. B., Ting, C., Salleh, S. H. S., Hamedi, M., & Noor, A. M. (2015) · World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0266-3_50 · Cited by 8
Management of Epilepsy - Research, Results and Treatment
Günel, M. K. (2011) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/1139 · Cited by 8
Roebroeck, A. F. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00337-7 · Cited by 8
Anwar, A. R., Muthalib, M., Perrey, S., Galka, A., Granert, O., Wolff, S., Deuschl, G., Raethjen, J., Heute, U., & Muthuraman, M. (2012) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2012.6346419 · Cited by 7
Smith, J. F., Chen, K., Pillai, A. S., & Horwitz, B. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00070 · Cited by 7
Spatiotemporal Neural Network for Sublexical Information Processing: An Intracranial SEEG Study
Zhao, C., Liu, Y., Zeng, J., Luo, X., Sun, W., Luan, G., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Shi, G., Guan, Y., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0717-24.2024 · Cited by 6
Zeng, J., Liu, Y., Zhao, C., Cui, Z., Jiao, S., Liu, Y., Liu, D., Zhang, X., Wu, J., Luo, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0307-25.2025 · Cited by 6
Pidnebesna, A., Fajnerová, I., Horáček, J., & Hlinka, J. (2022) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2022.11.034 · Cited by 6
Deshpande, G., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12101361 · Cited by 6
Investigating dynamic causal network with unified Granger causality analysis
Li, F., Cheng, M., Chu, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., Lin, Q., & Hu, Z. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109720 · Cited by 5
Avcu, E., Newman, O., Ahlfors, S. P., & Gow, D. W. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105322 · Cited by 5
Causal inference in neuronal time-series using adaptive decomposition
Rodrigues, J., & Andrade, A. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.013 · Cited by 5
EEG source localization based on multivariate autoregressive models using Kalman filtering
Buriticá, J. I. P., Giraldo, E., & Castellanos-Dominguez, G. (2011) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6091807 · Cited by 4
McFarlin, D. R., Kerr, D. L., & Nitschke, J. B. (2012) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0093 · Cited by 4
Analyzing epileptic network dynamics via time-variant partial directed coherence
Liu, B., Mao, J.-W., Shi, Y.-J., Lu, Q.-C., Liang, P.-J., & Zhang, P.-M. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2016.7822547 · Cited by 5
Dynamic neural reconfiguration for distinct strategies during competitive social interactions
Yang, R., Ma, Y., Pan, B., Bhatt, M. A., Lohrenz, T. M., Gu, H., Kanen, J. W., Camerer, C. F., Montague, P. R., & Luo, Q. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119585 · Cited by 6
Chuang, C., Fang, S.-X., Huang, C.-S., & Ding, W. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109347 · Cited by 3
Neurovascular deconvolution of optical signals as a proxy for the true neuronal inputs
Dubeau, S., Havlíček, M., Beaumont, É., Ferland, G., Lesage, F., & Pouliot, P. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.07.008 · Cited by 3
A Review on Dependence Measures in Exploring Brain Networks from fMRI Data
Pruttiakaravanich, A., & Songsiri, J. (2016) · Engineering Journal · doi:10.4186/ej.2016.20.3.207 · Cited by 3
Causality of Spike Trains Based on Entropy
Li, Z., & Xiaoli Li, A. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1822-0_3 · Cited by 2
Sadeghi, A. Z., Oghabian, M. A., Zare-Bidoky, M., Batouli, S. A. H., & Ekhtiari, H. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/678961 · Cited by 2
Pidnebesna, A., Fajnerová, I., Horáček, J., & Hlinka, J. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2019.12.19.876508 · Cited by 2
Mapping effective connectivity
Reyes, R. G., & Valdes-Sosa, P. A. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820480-1.00184-4 · Cited by 2
Hedlin, H., Boatman, D. F., & Caffo, B. S. (2010) · Collection of Biostatistics Research Archive · Cited by 1
Karameh, F. N., & Nahas, Z. H. (2018) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-018-0666-3 · Cited by 1
Decision thresholding on fMRI activation maps using the Hilbert–Huang transform
Kuo, P., & Liou, M. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac7f5e · Cited by 1
Ma, Y., Liang, X., Wu, H., Lu, H., Li, Y., Liu, C., Gao, Y., Xiang, M., Yu, D., & Ning, X. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11121258 · Cited by 1
EEG-fMRI Multimodal Integration for Epilepsy Research
Anna, M., Franchin, T., & Maria, G. D. (2011) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/21891
Arbabshirani, M. R. (2014) · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)
Optimally estimating Granger causalityPreprint
Luo, Q., Lu, W., Cheng, W., Valdes-Sosa, P. A., Wen, X., Ding, M., & Feng, J. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Causality analysis of P300 recordings focused on the localization of active brain areas
Padilla, B. J. I., Avendao, J., & Castellanos, D. G. (2014) · Symposium on Image, Signal Processing and Artificial Vision (STSIVA) · doi:10.1109/stsiva.2014.7010127
Metadata
- Authors
- Havlicek, M., Jan, J., Brazdil, M., & Calhoun, V. D.
- Affiliations
- Mind Research Network (US)
- ORCID
- Calhoun, Vince D.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-77
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4347842
- OpenAlex
- W1963526411
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
- National Institutes of Health (R01EB000840)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- Kalman filter, functional network connectivity, fMRI time series, non-stationary time series, generalized partial directed coherence, frequency domain causality, independent component analysis, brain neural networks
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Perception, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review