Cited by 75Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Spatial attention improves reliability of fMRI retinotopic mapping signals in occipital and parietal cortex

Open access
Bressler, David W., Silver, Michael A.·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

Spatial attention improves visual perception and increases the amplitude of neural responses in visual cortex. In addition, spatial attention tasks and fMRI have been used to discover topographic visual field representations in regions outside visual cortex. We therefore hypothesized that requiring subjects to attend to a retinotopic mapping stimulus would facilitate the characterization of visual field representations in a number of cortical areas. In our study, subjects attended either a central fixation point or a wedge-shaped stimulus that rotated about the fixation point. Response reliability was assessed by computing coherence between the fMRI time series and a sinusoid with the same frequency as the rotating wedge stimulus. When subjects attended to the rotating wedge instead of ignoring it, the reliability of retinotopic mapping signals increased by approximately 50% in early visual cortical areas (V1, V2, V3, V3A/B, V4) and ventral occipital cortex (VO1) and by approximately 75% in lateral occipital (LO1, LO2) and posterior parietal (IPS0, IPS1, IPS2) cortical areas. Additionally, one 5-min run of retinotopic mapping in the attention-to-wedge condition produced responses as reliable as the average of three to five (early visual cortex) or more than five (lateral occipital, ventral occipital, and posterior parietal cortex) attention-to-fixation runs. These results demonstrate that allocating attention to the retinotopic mapping stimulus substantially reduces the amount of scanning time needed to determine the visual field representations in occipital and parietal topographic cortical areas. Attention significantly increased response reliability in every cortical area we examined and may therefore be a general mechanism for improving the fidelity of neural representations of sensory stimuli at multiple levels of the cortical processing hierarchy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.063

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In detection and coarse discrimination tasks, Lau, Rahnev, and colleagues report that subjects overestimate their confidence in the periphery and for unattended stimuli.

    “In detection and coarse discrimination tasks, Lau, Rahnev, and colleagues report that subjects overestimate their confidence in the periphery and for unattended stimuli.”

    From Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports (2018) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Methods (Task) and Results (Behavioral results; page unavailable) describe target detection across eccentricities and attention conditions, but not subjects’ confidence judgments. Searches for overestimated confidence, peripheral stimuli, and Lau or Rahnev found no passage in our copy supporting the attributed finding. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Bashinski HS Bacharach VR 1980 Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations Percept Psychophys 28 241 248 7433002
  2. Brewer AA Liu J Wade AR Wandell BA 2005 Visual field maps and stimulus selectivity in human ventral occipital cortex Nat Neurosci 8 1102 1109 16025108
  3. Buracas GT Boynton GM 2007 The effect of spatial attention on contrast response functions in human visual cortex J Neurosci 27 93 97 17202476 PMC6672290
  4. Bushnell MC Goldberg ME Robinson DL 1981 Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex. I. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention J Neurophysiol 46 755 772 7288463
  5. Cohen MR Maunsell JHR 2009 Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations Nat Neurosci 12 1594 1600 19915566 PMC2820564
  6. DeYoe EA Carman GJ Bandettini P Glickman S Wieser J Cox R Miller D Neitz J 1996 Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93 2382 2386 8637882 PMC39805
  7. Dumoulin SO Wandell BA 2008 Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex Neuroimage 39 647 660 17977024 PMC3073038
  8. Engel SA Glover GH Wandell BA 1997 Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI Cereb Cortex 7 181 192 9087826
  9. Engel SA Rumelhart DE Wandell BA Lee AT Glover GH Chichilnisky EJ Shadlen MN 1994 fMRI of human visual cortex Nature 369 525 8031403
  10. Gandhi SP Heeger DJ Boynton GM 1999 Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96 3314 3319 10077681 PMC15939
  11. Hagler DJ Jr Riecke L Sereno MI 2007 Parietal and superior frontal visuospatial maps activated by pointing and saccades Neuroimage 35 1562 1577 17376706 PMC2752728
  12. Hagler DJ Jr Sereno MI 2006 Spatial maps in frontal and prefrontal cortex Neuroimage 29 567 577 16289928
  13. Hansen KA Kay KN Gallant JL 2007 Topographic organization in and near human visual area V4 J Neurosci 27 11896 11911 17978030 PMC6673353
  14. Hoffmann MB Stadler J Kanowski M Speck O 2009 Retinotopic mapping of the human visual cortex at a magnetic field strength of 7T Clin Neurophysiol 120 108 116 19071059
  15. Jenkinson M Bannister P Brady M Smith S 2002 Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images Neuroimage 17 825 841 12377157
  16. Kastner S DeSimone K Konen CS Szczepanski SM Weiner KS Schneider KA 2007 Topographic maps in human frontal cortex revealed in memory-guided saccade and spatial working-memory tasks J Neurophysiol 97 3494 3507 17360822
  17. Kastner S Pinsk MA De Weerd P Desimone R Ungerleider LG 1999 Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation Neuron 22 751 761 10230795
  18. Konen CS Kastner S 2008 Representation of eye movements and stimulus motion in topographically organized areas of human posterior parietal cortex J Neurosci 28 8361 8375 18701699 PMC2685070
  19. Larsson J Heeger DJ 2006 Two retinotopic visual areas in human lateral occipital cortex J Neurosci 26 13128 13142 17182764 PMC1904390
  20. Lauritzen TZ D'Esposito M Heeger DJ Silver MA 2009 Top-down flow of visual spatial attention signals from parietal to occipital cortex J Vis 9 13 18 1 14 20055551 PMC2857595
  21. Li X Lu ZL Tjan BS Dosher BA Chu W 2008 Blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast response functions identify mechanisms of covert attention in early visual areas Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105 6202 6207 18413602 PMC2329700
  22. McAdams CJ Maunsell JHR 1999 Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area V4 J Neurosci 19 431 441 9870971 PMC6782389
  23. Mitchell JF Sundberg KA Reynolds JH 2009 Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4 Neuron 63 879 888 19778515 PMC2765230
  24. Motter BC 1993 Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli J Neurophysiol 70 909 919 8229178
  25. Murray SO 2008 The effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex are stimulus independent J Vis 8 10 2 1 11 19146344
  26. Posner MI Snyder CRR Davidson BJ 1980 Attention and the detection of signals J Exp Psychol: Gen 109 160 174 7381367
  27. Rosenberg JR Amjad AM Breeze P Brillinger DR Halliday DM 1989 The Fourier approach to the identification of functional coupling between neuronal spike trains Prog Biophys Mol Biol 53 1 31 2682781
  28. Saygin AP Sereno MI 2008 Retinotopy and attention in human occipital, temporal, parietal, and frontal cortex Cereb Cortex 18 2158 2168 18234687
  29. Schluppeck D Glimcher P Heeger DJ 2005 Topographic organization for delayed saccades in human posterior parietal cortex J Neurophysiol 94 1372 1384 15817644 PMC2367322
  30. Serences JT Yantis S 2006 Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence Trends Cogn Sci 10 38 45 16318922
  31. Sereno MI Dale AM Reppas JB Kwong KK Belliveau JW Brady TJ Rosen BR Tootell RBH 1995 Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional MRI Science 268 889 893 7754376
  32. Silver MA Kastner S 2009 Topographic maps in human frontal and parietal cortex Trends Cogn Sci 13 488 495 19758835 PMC2767426
  33. Silver MA Ress D Heeger DJ 2005 Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex J Neurophysiol 94 1358 1371 15817643 PMC2367310
  34. Silver MA Ress D Heeger DJ 2007 Neural correlates of sustained spatial attention in human early visual cortex J Neurophysiol 97 229 237 16971677 PMC1868502
  35. Slotnick SD Klein SA Carney T Sutter EE 2001 Electrophysiological estimate of human cortical magnification Clin Neurophysiol 112 1349 1356 11516748
  36. Slotnick SD Yantis S 2003 Efficient acquisition of human retinotopic maps Hum Brain Mapp 18 22 29 12454909 PMC6872112
  37. Somers DC Dale AM Seiffert AE Tootell RBH 1999 Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96 1663 1668 9990081 PMC15552
  38. Swisher JD Halko MA Merabet LB McMains SA Somers DC 2007 Visual topography of human intraparietal sulcus J Neurosci 27 5326 5337 17507555 PMC6672354
  39. Tootell RBH Hadjikhani N Hall EK Marrett S Vanduffel W Vaughan JT Dale AM 1998 The retinotopy of visual spatial attention Neuron 21 1409 1422 9883733

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bressler, D. W., & Silver, M. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Bressler, David W.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
526-533
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049016757
Cited by
75
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R21-EY17926, R21EY017926)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Keywords
spatial attention, retinotopic mapping, visual field representation, response reliability, early visual cortex, lateral occipital cortex, posterior parietal cortex, topographic map, scan time reduction
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain Mapping, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Occipital Lobe, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Retina, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Space Perception, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review