Cited by 80Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Topographic representation of an occluded object and the effects of spatiotemporal context in human early visual areas

Open access
Ban, Hiroshi, Yamamoto, Hiroki, Hanakawa, Takashi, Urayama, Shin-ichi, Aso, Toshihiko, Fukuyama, Hidenao, Ejima, Yoshimichi·2013·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Occlusion is a primary challenge facing the visual system in perceiving object shapes in intricate natural scenes. Although behavior, neurophysiological, and modeling studies have shown that occluded portions of objects may be completed at the early stage of visual processing, we have little knowledge on how and where in the human brain the completion is realized. Here, we provide functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) evidence that the occluded portion of an object is indeed represented topographically in human V1 and V2. Specifically, we find the topographic cortical responses corresponding to the invisible object rotation in V1 and V2. Furthermore, by investigating neural responses for the occluded target rotation within precisely defined cortical subregions, we could dissociate the topographic neural representation of the occluded portion from other types of neural processing such as object edge processing. We further demonstrate that the early topographic representation in V1 can be modulated by prior knowledge of a whole appearance of an object obtained before partial occlusion. These findings suggest that primary "visual" area V1 has the ability to process not only visible or virtually (illusorily) perceived objects but also "invisible" portions of objects without concurrent visual sensation such as luminance enhancement to these portions. The results also suggest that low-level image features and higher preceding cognitive context are integrated into a unified topographic representation of occluded portion in early areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1455-12.2013

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activity patterns in nonstimulated parts of early visual cortex contain content-specific information from the surrounding visual context, from objects presented in the periphery, and from visual stimuli solely held in working memory rather than being actively perceived.

    “For example, activity patterns in nonstimulated parts of early visual cortex contain content-specific information from the surrounding visual context [31, 32], from objects presented in the periphery [33], and from visual stimuli solely held in working memory rather than being actively perceived [34, 35].”

    From Decoding sound and imagery content in early visual cortex (2014) · cites this paper as [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nakayama K, He ZJ, Shimojo S (1995) Visual surface representation: a crit- ical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In: Frontiers in cog- nitive neuroscience, Ed 2 (Kosslyn S, Osherson DN, eds), pp 1-70. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ban, H., Yamamoto, H., Hanakawa, T., Urayama, S.-I., Aso, T., Fukuyama, H., & Ejima, Y.
Affiliations
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
  • Kyoto Institute of Technology (JP)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-10-23
Volume
33
Issue
43
Pages
16992-17007
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1998816141
Cited by
80
References
79
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (23135517)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
occlusion, topographic representation, primary visual cortex, V2, object completion, spatio-temporal context, object rotation, illusory perception, luminance enhancement, early visual processing
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review