Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linking inter-individual differences in neural activation and behavior to intrinsic brain dynamics

Open access
Mennes, Maarten, Zuo, Xi-Nian, Kelly, Clare, Di Martino, Adriana, Zang, Yu-Feng, Biswal, Bharat, Castellanos, F. Xavier, Milham, Michael P.·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

The brain’s energy economy excessively favors intrinsic, spontaneous neural activity over extrinsic, evoked activity, presumably to maintain its internal organization. Emerging hypotheses capable of explaining such an investment posit that the brain’s intrinsic functional architecture encodes a blueprint for its repertoire of responses to the external world. Yet, there is little evidence directly linking intrinsic and extrinsic activity in the brain. Here we relate differences among individuals in the magnitude of task-evoked activity during performance of an Eriksen flanker task, to spontaneous oscillatory phenomena observed during rest. Specifically, we focused on the amplitude of low-frequency oscillations (LFO, 0.01–0.1Hz) present in the BOLD signal. LFO amplitude measures obtained during rest successfully predicted the magnitude of task-evoked activity in a variety of regions that were all activated during performance of the flanker task. In these regions, higher LFO amplitude at rest predicted higher task-evoked activity. LFO amplitude measures obtained during rest were also found to have robust predictive value for behavior. In midline cingulate regions, LFO amplitudes not only predicted the speed and consistency of performance, but also the magnitude of the behavioral congruency effect embedded in the flanker task. These results support the emerging hypothesis that the brain’s repertoire of responses to the external world are represented and updated in the brain’s intrinsic functional architecture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.046

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Mennes, M., Zuo, X.-N., Kelly, C., Di Martino, A., Zang, Y.-F., Biswal, B., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
2950-2959
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028897503
Cited by
218
References
22
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking inter-individual differences in neural activation and behavior to intrinsic brain dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.046
The paper
Mennes, M., Zuo, X.-N., Kelly, C., Di Martino, A., Zang, Y.-F., Biswal, B., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2011). Linking inter-individual differences in neural activation and behavior to intrinsic brain dynamics. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.