Cited by 333Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAction Observation and SynchronizationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The balance between feeling and knowing: affective and cognitive empathy are reflected in the brain’s intrinsic functional dynamics.

Open access
Cox, Christine L., Uddin, Lucina Q., Di Martino, Adriana, Castellanos, F. Xavier, Milham, Michael P., Kelly, Clare·2012·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Affective empathy (AE) is distinguished clinically and neurally from cognitive empathy (CE). While AE is selectively disrupted in psychopathy, autism is associated with deficits in CE. Despite such dissociations, AE and CE together contribute to normal human empathic experience. A dimensional measure of individual differences in AE 'relative to' CE captures this interaction and may reveal brain-behavior relationships beyond those detectable with AE and CE separately. Using resting-state fMRI and measures of empathy in healthy adults, we show that relative empathic ability (REA) is reflected in the brain's intrinsic functional dynamics. Dominance of AE was associated with stronger functional connectivity among social-emotional regions (ventral anterior insula, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, perigenual anterior cingulate). Dominance of CE was related to stronger connectivity among areas implicated in interoception, autonomic monitoring and social-cognitive processing (brainstem, superior temporal sulcus, ventral anterior insula). These patterns were distinct from those observed with AE and CE separately. Finally, REA and the strength of several functional connections were associated with symptoms of psychopathology. These findings suggest that REA provides a dimensional index of empathic function and pathological tendencies in healthy adults, which are reflected in the intrinsic functional dynamics of neural systems associated with social and emotional cognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsr051

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, C. L., Uddin, L. Q., Di Martino, A., Castellanos, F. X., Milham, M. P., & Kelly, C.
Affiliations
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • Phyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Institute for Pediatric Neuroscience at the New York University Child Study Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA, 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA, and 3Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2011-09-05
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
727-737
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2164055896
Cited by
333
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Stavros Niarchos Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH087770, K01MH092288, R01MH083246, R01MH081218)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA007254, R01DA016979, R03DA024775)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
affective empathy, cognitive empathy, intrinsic functional connectivity, resting-state brain dynamics, social-emotional processing, interoception, social cognition, psychopathology, ventral anterior insula, amygdala, superior temporal sulcus
MeSH terms
Prohibitins, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Dominance, Cerebral, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review