The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methylphenidate enhances brain activation and deactivation responses to visual attention and working memory tasks in healthy controls
Open accessAbstract
Methylphenidate (MPH) is a stimulant drug that amplifies dopamineric and noradrenergic signaling in the brain, which is believed to underlie its cognition enhancing effects. However, the neurobiological effects by which MPH improves cognition are still poorly understood. Here, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used together with working memory (WM) and visual attention (VA) tasks to test the hypothesis that 20mg oral MPH would increase activation in the dorsal attention network (DAN) and deactivation in the default mode network (DMN) as well as improve performance during cognitive tasks in healthy men. The group of subjects that received MPH (MPH group; N=16) had higher activation than the group of subjects who received no medication (control group: N=16) in DAN regions (parietal and prefrontal cortex, regions increasingly activated with increased cognitive load) and had increased deactivation in the insula and posterior cingulate cortex (regions increasingly deactivated with increased cognitive load) and these effects did not differ for the VA and the WM tasks. These findings provide the first evidence that MPH enhances activation of the DAN whereas it alters DMN deactivation. This suggests that MPH (presumably by amplifying dopamine and noradrenergic signaling) modulates cognition in part through its effects on DAN and DMN.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Taken together, both stimulants and nonstimulants may act on brain frontoparietal circuity to ameliorate the dysfunction of cognitive control and attention in ADHD individuals (Cubillo et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2022; Tomasi et al., 2011)”
From Overlapping and differential neuropharmacological mechanisms of stimulants and nonstimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A comparative neuroimaging analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Tomasi et al., 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Using fMRI, it has been shown that MPH increases activation of the parietal and prefrontal cortices and increases deactivation of the insula and posterior cingulate cortex during visual attention and working memory tasks (180).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain
Worsley, K. J., Evans, A. C., Marrett, S., & Neelin, P. (1992) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1992.127 · Cited by 2,036
Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.
Pylyshyn, Z., & Storm, R. (1988) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856888x00122 · Cited by 2,021
The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention
de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1056496 · Cited by 924
McCabe, S. E., Knight, J. R., Teter, C. J., & Wechsler, H. (2004) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00944.x · Cited by 880
Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do?
Farah, M. J., Illes, J., Cook-Deegan, R. M., Gardner, H., Kandel, E. R., King, P., Parens, E., Sahakian, B. J., & Wolpe, P. R. (2004) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1390 · Cited by 653
Functional connectivity density mapping
Tomasi, D. G., & Volkow, N. D. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1001414107 · Cited by 645
Self-citationBerridge, C. W., Devilbiss, D. M., Andrzejewski, M. E., Arnsten, A. F. T., Kelley, A. E., Schmeichel, B., Hamilton, C., & Spencer, R. C. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.04.022 · Cited by 617
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faraone, S. V. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.001 · Cited by 631
Aging and functional brain networks
Tomasi, D., & Volkow, N. D. (2012) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2011.81 · Cited by 578
Self-citationBrain default-mode network dysfunction in addiction
Zhang, R., & Volkow, N. D. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.036 · Cited by 386
Self-citationPsychostimulants and Cognition: A Continuum of Behavioral and Cognitive Activation
Wood, S., Sage, J. R., Shuman, T., & Anagnostaras, S. G. (2014) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.112.007054 · Cited by 259
Violante, I. R., Li, L. M., Carmichael, D. W., Lorenz, R., Leech, R., Hampshire, A., Rothwell, J. C., & Sharp, D. J. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.22001 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomasi, D., Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. J., Wang, R., Telang, F., Caparelli, E. C., Wong, C., Jayne, M., & Fowler, J. S.
- Affiliations
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (US)
- Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tomasi, D.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3101-3110
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3020254
- OpenAlex
- W2027473195
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 11.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2RO1AA09481)
- National Center for Research Resources (GCRC 5-MO1-RR-10710)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- methylphenidate, stimulants, cognitive enhancement, dorsal attention network, default mode network, brain deactivation, visual attention, working memory, cognitive load, parietal cortex, prefrontal cortex, insula, posterior cingulate cortex, dopamine, norepinephrine
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention, Brain, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Methylphenidate, Photic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
