The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the Amine–Proton EXchange (APEX) dependent contrast
Open accessAbstract
Chemical exchange between water and labile protons from amino-acids, proteins and other molecules can be exploited to provide tissue contrast with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. Using an off-resonance Spin-Locking (SL) scheme for signal preparation is advantageous because the image contrast can be tuned to specific exchange rates by adjusting SL pulse parameters. While the amide-proton transfer (APT) contrast is obtained optimally with steady-state preparation, using a low power and long irradiation pulse, image contrast from the faster amine-water proton exchange (APEX) is optimized in the transient state with a higher power and a shorter SL pulse. Our phantom experiments show that the APEX contrast is sensitive to protein and amino acid concentration, as well as pH. In vivo 9.4-T SL MRI data of rat brains with irradiation parameters optimized to slow exchange rates have a sharp peak at 3.5 ppm and also broad peak at −2 to −5 ppm, inducing negative contrast in APT-weighted images, while the APEX image has large positive signal resulting from a weighted summation of many different amine-groups. Brain ischemia induced by cardiac arrest decreases pure APT signal from ~1.7% to ~0%, and increases the APEX signal from ~8% to ~16%. In the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model, the APEX signal shows different spatial and temporal patterns with large inter-animal variations compared to APT and water diffusion maps. Because of the similarity between the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and SL techniques, APEX contrast can also be obtained by a CEST approach using similar irradiation parameters. APEX may provide useful information for many diseases involving a change in levels of proteins, peptides, amino-acids, or pH, and may serve as a sensitive neuroimaging biomarker.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental studies of ischemic brain edema
Koizumi, J.-I., Yoshida, Y., Nakazawa, T., & Ooneda, G. (1986) · Nosotchu · doi:10.3995/jstroke.8.1 · Cited by 996
Reduced hippocampal glutamate in Alzheimer disease
Rupsingh, R., Borrie, M., Smith, M., Wells, J. L., & Bartha, R. (2011) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.05.002 · Cited by 177
Cited by
Zaiss, M., & Bachert, P. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/r221 · Cited by 323
Jin, T., Wang, P., Zong, X., & Kim, S. (2013) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.24315 · Cited by 273
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, T., Wang, P., Zong, X., & Kim, S.-G.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1218-1227
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064588148
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic resonance imaging of the Amine–Proton EXchange (APEX) dependent contrast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.014
- The paper
- Jin, T., Wang, P., Zong, X., & Kim, S.-G. (2012). Magnetic resonance imaging of the Amine–Proton EXchange (APEX) dependent contrast. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.