The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): A comparison to standard approaches
Open accessAbstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) allows one to study task-related regional responses and task-dependent connectivity analysis using psychophysiological interaction (PPI) methods. The latter affords the additional opportunity to understand how brain regions interact in a task-dependent manner. The current implementation of PPI in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8) is configured primarily to assess connectivity differences between two task conditions, when in practice fMRI tasks frequently employ more than two conditions. Here we evaluate how a generalized form of context-dependent PPI (gPPI; http://www.nitrc.org/projects/gppi), which is configured to automatically accommodate more than two task conditions in the same PPI model by spanning the entire experimental space, compares to the standard implementation in SPM8. These comparisons are made using both simulations and an empirical dataset. In the simulated dataset, we compare the interaction beta estimates to their expected values and model fit using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). We found that interaction beta estimates in gPPI were robust to different simulated data models, were not different from the expected beta value, and had better model fits than when using standard PPI (sPPI) methods. In the empirical dataset, we compare the model fit of the gPPI approach to sPPI. We found that the gPPI approach improved model fit compared to sPPI. There were several regions that became non-significant with gPPI. These regions all showed significantly better model fits with gPPI. Also, there were several regions where task-dependent connectivity was only detected using gPPI methods, also with improved model fit. Regions that were detected with all methods had more similar model fits. These results suggest that gPPI may have greater sensitivity and specificity than standard implementation in SPM. This notion is tempered slightly as there is no gold standard; however, data simulations with a known outcome support our conclusions about gPPI. In sum, the generalized form of context-dependent PPI approach has increased flexibility of statistical modeling, and potentially improves model fit, specificity to true negative findings, and sensitivity to true positive findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“with amygdala dysfunction underlying psychopathology;59”
From Distinct and shared therapeutic neural mechanisms of mindfulness-based and social support stress reduction groups in adults with autism spectrum disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [59]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
ANew Look at the Statistical Model Identification
AKAlKE, H. (2011) · Cited by 4,177
Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging
Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1997) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0291 · Cited by 3,097
Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1
Boynton, G., Engel, S., Glover, G., & Heeger, D. (1996) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04207.1996 · Cited by 2,522
Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Poline, J., Grasby, P. M., Williams, S., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Turner, R. (1995) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1007 · Cited by 2,504
A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex
Van Essen, D. C. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058 · Cited by 1,151
Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: A problem of significance
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2886 · Cited by 864
Gitelman, D. R., Penny, W. D., Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00058-2 · Cited by 799
Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI.
Friston, K. J., Frith, C., Turner, R., & Frackowiak, R. (1995) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1018 · Cited by 711
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control
Cole, M. W., Reynolds, J. R., Power, J. D., Repovs, G., Anticevic, A., & Braver, T. S. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3470 · Cited by 1,704
Causal interactions between fronto-parietal central executive and default-mode networks in humans
Chen, A. C., Oathes, D. J., Chang, C., Bradley, T., Zhou, Z.-W., Williams, L. M., Glover, G. H., Deisseroth, K. A., & Etkin, A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1311772110 · Cited by 580
Hanson, J. L., Hariri, A. R., & Williamson, D. E. (2015) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.010 · Cited by 338
Kral, T. R. A., Schuyler, B. S., Mumford, J. A., Rosenkranz, M. A., Lutz, A., & Davidson, R. J. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.013 · Cited by 326
Non-invasive temporal interference electrical stimulation of the human hippocampus
Violante, I. R., Alania, K., Cassara, A. M., Neufeld, E., Acerbo, E., Carron, R., Williamson, A., Kurtin, D. L., Hampshire, A., Hampshire, P. A., et al. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2023.01.833 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- McLaren, D. G., Ries, M. L., Xu, G., & Johnson, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Sterling C.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1277-1286
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3376181
- OpenAlex
- W2132137022
- Cited by
- 1,445
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 120 · 2016: 122 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 23.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Veterans Affairs Merit Review (I01CX000165)
- National Institutes of Health (AG021155, AG000213)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- generalized psychophysiological interaction, functional MRI, statistical parametric mapping, model fit, Akaike information criterion, brain connectivity
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Psychophysiology, Sensitivity and Specificity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
