Cited by 765Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity

Open access
O’Reilly, Jill X., Woolrich, Mark W., Behrens, Timothy E.J., Smith, Stephen M., Johansen-Berg, Heidi·2012·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Psychophysiological interactions (PPIs) analysis is a method for investigating task-specific changes in the relationship between activity in different brain areas, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Specifically, PPI analyses identify voxels in which activity is more related to activity in a seed region of interest (seed ROI) in a given psychological context, such as during attention or in the presence of emotive stimuli. In this tutorial, we aim to give a simple conceptual explanation of how PPI analysis works, in order to assist readers in planning and interpreting their own PPI experiments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nss055

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The psychophysiological interaction model specification ensures results only indicate effects over and above those explained by co-activation related to the task main effect or anatomical connections that lead to pervasively correlated activity regardless of task condition.

    “Importantly, the model specification for this analysis ensures that results will only indicate effects over and above those explained by either co-activation related to the task main effect or anatomical connections that lead to pervasively correlated activity regardless of task condition33.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Reilly, J. X., Woolrich, M. W., Behrens, T. E. J., Smith, S. M., & Johansen-Berg, H.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • FMRIB Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, 2Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX and 3Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2012-05-07
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
604-609
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2148191429
Cited by
765
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 8
FWCI
21.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (090955)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
psychophysiological interaction, functional connectivity, fMRI data analysis, attention, emotional stimuli
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Psychophysiology, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review