The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
State-space model with deep learning for functional dynamics estimation in resting-state fMRI
Open accessAbstract
Studies on resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) have shown that different brain regions still actively interact with each other while a subject is at rest, and such functional interaction is not stationary but changes over time. In terms of a large-scale brain network, in this paper, we focus on time-varying patterns of functional networks, i.e., functional dynamics, inherent in rs-fMRI, which is one of the emerging issues along with the network modelling. Specifically, we propose a novel methodological architecture that combines deep learning and state-space modelling, and apply it to rs-fMRI based Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) diagnosis. We first devise a Deep Auto-Encoder (DAE) to discover hierarchical non-linear functional relations among regions, by which we transform the regional features into an embedding space, whose bases are complex functional networks. Given the embedded functional features, we then use a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) to estimate dynamic characteristics of functional networks inherent in rs-fMRI via internal states, which are unobservable but can be inferred from observations statistically. By building a generative model with an HMM, we estimate the likelihood of the input features of rs-fMRI as belonging to the corresponding status, i.e., MCI or normal healthy control, based on which we identify the clinical label of a testing subject. In order to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we performed experiments on two different datasets and compared with state-of-the-art methods in the literature. We also analyzed the functional networks learned by DAE, estimated the functional connectivities by decoding hidden states in HMM, and investigated the estimated functional connectivities by means of a graph-theoretic approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · Cited by 8,553
Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence
Hinton, G. E. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602760128018 · Cited by 4,879 · cited 2×
“In order to learn the parameters Θ = {W,q, z} of an RBM, we can use a contrastive divergence algorithm (Hinton, 2002), which maximizes the log-likelihood of the marginal distribution of the visible variables, i.”
BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics
Xia, M., Wang, J., & He, Y. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068910 · Cited by 4,106
Greicius, M. D., Srivastava, G., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0308627101 · Cited by 3,684
Murphy, K., Birn, R. M., Handwerker, D. A., Jones, T. B., & Bandettini, P. A. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036 · Cited by 2,387
Cited by
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332
Deep learning in medical image analysis
Shen, D., Wu, G., & Suk, H.-I. (2017) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442 · Cited by 4,968
Self-citationLi, X., Gu, Y., Dvornek, N., Staib, L. H., Ventola, P., & Duncan, J. S. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101765 · Cited by 480
A survey on deep learning-based non-invasive brain signals: recent advances and new frontiers
Zhang, X., Yao, L., Wang, X., Monaghan, J., McAlpine, D., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abc902 · Cited by 296
Content-based brain tumor retrieval for MR images using transfer learning
Swati, Z. N. K., Zhao, Q., Kabir, M., Ali, F., Ali, Z., Ahmed, S., & Lu, J. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2892455 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Suk, H.-I., Wee, C.-Y., Lee, S.-W., & Shen, D.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 129
- Pages
- 292-307
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2238108400
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 20.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: State-space model with deep learning for functional dynamics estimation in resting-state fMRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.005
- The paper
- Suk, H.-I., Wee, C.-Y., Lee, S.-W., & Shen, D. (2016). State-space model with deep learning for functional dynamics estimation in resting-state fMRI. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.