Cited by 52Research Data Management PracticesPrimate Behavior and EcologyFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

A collaborative resource platform for non-human primate neuroimaging

Open access
Messinger, Adam, Sirmpilatze, Nikoloz, Heuer, Katja, Loh, Kep Kee, Mars, Rogier B., Sein, Julien, Xu, Ting, Glen, Daniel +24 more·2021·NeuroImage

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Neuroimaging non-human primates (NHPs) is a growing, yet highly specialized field of neuroscience. Resources that were primarily developed for human neuroimaging often need to be significantly adapted for use with NHPs or other animals, which has led to an abundance of custom, in-house solutions. In recent years, the global NHP neuroimaging community has made significant efforts to transform the field towards more open and collaborative practices. Here we present the PRIMatE Resource Exchange (PRIME-RE), a new collaborative online platform for NHP neuroimaging. PRIME-RE is a dynamic community-driven hub for the exchange of practical knowledge, specialized analytical tools, and open data repositories, specifically related to NHP neuroimaging. PRIME-RE caters to both researchers and developers who are either new to the field, looking to stay abreast of the latest developments, or seeking to collaboratively advance the field .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117519

Cites

87 of 88 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collaborative international projects such as the PRIMatE Resource Exchange offer advanced tools that allow fitting probabilistic retinotopic maps generated from large samples to any individual NHP brain.

    “Collaborative international projects such as the PRIMatE Resource Exchange (PRIME-RE) offer advanced tools which allow to fit probabilistic retinotopic maps generated from large samples to any individual NHP brain (Klink et al., 2021; Messinger et al., 2021)”

    From Towards biologically plausible phosphene simulation for the differentiable optimization of visual cortical prostheses (2024) · cites this paper as Messinger et al., 2021

    The Abstract and Introduction describe PRIME-RE as a collaborative platform for sharing NHP neuroimaging tools. The Results (PRIME-RE resources) describe registration tools for macaque templates and individual scans, but do not establish that PRIME-RE offers a tool to fit probabilistic retinotopic maps from large samples to any individual NHP brain. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Craddock C, Sikka S, Cheung B, Khanuja R, Ghosh SS, Yan C, Li Q, Lurie D, Vogelstein J, Burns R, Colcombe S, Mennes M, Kelly C, Di Martino A, Castellanos FX, Milham M, 2013. Towards automated analysis of connectomes: the configurable pipeline for the analysis of connectomes (C-PAC). Front. Neuroinform 7 https://doi.org/10/gg3ffc.
  2. Hartig R, Glen D, Jung B, Logothetis NK, Paxinos G, Garza-Villarreal EA, Messinger A, Evrard HC, this issue. Subcortical atlas for macaque functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage. 33794360
  3. Klink PC, Sirmpilatze N, 2020. RheMAP. GitHub Repos. https://doi.org/10/ggtm5r.
  4. Paxinos G, Petrides M, Evrard HC, in preparation. The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 4th ed. Elsevier.
  5. Paxinos G, Watson C, Petrides M, Rosa M, Tokuno H, 2012. The Marmoset Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 1st ed. Academic Press.
  6. Sirmpilatze N, Klink PC, 2020. RheMAP: non-linear warps between common rhesus macaque brain templates. Zenodo https://doi.org/10/ggtm5q.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Messinger, A., Sirmpilatze, N., Heuer, K., Loh, K. K., Mars, R. B., Sein, J., Xu, T., Glen, D., Jung, B., Seidlitz, J., Taylor, P., Toro, R., Garza-Villarreal, E. A., Sponheim, C., Wang, X., Benn, R. A., Cagna, B., Dadarwal, R., Evrard, H. C., Garcia-Saldivar, P., Giavasis, S., Hartig, R., Lepage, C., Liu, C., Majka, P., Merchant, H., Milham, M. P., Rosa, M. G. P., Tasserie, J., Uhrig, L., Margulies, D. S., & Klink, P. C.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • German Primate Center (DE)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Child Mind Institute (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research (ES)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Australian Research Council (AU)
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
Corresponding author
Klink, P. Christiaan
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
226
Pages
117519
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3099783891
Cited by
52
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fondation de France
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • Wellcome Trust (203129/Z/16/Z)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N019814/1)
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (ECO20160736100)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
collaborative platforms, open science, open data repositories, analytical tools, knowledge sharing
MeSH terms
Animals, Online Systems, Primates, Access to Information, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review