Cited by 197Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

Disentangling micro from mesostructure by diffusion MRI: A Bayesian approach

Open access
Reisert, Marco, Kellner, Elias, Dhital, Bibek, Hennig, Jürgen, Kiselev, Valerij G.·2017·NeuroImage

Abstract

Diffusion-sensitized magnetic resonance imaging probes the cellular structure of the human brain, but the primary microstructural information gets lost in averaging over higher-level, mesoscopic tissue organization such as different orientations of neuronal fibers. While such averaging is inevitable due to the limited imaging resolution, we propose a method for disentangling the microscopic cell properties from the effects of mesoscopic structure. We further avoid the classical fitting paradigm and use supervised machine learning in terms of a Bayesian estimator to estimate the microstructural properties. The method finds detectable parameters of a given microstructural model and calculates them within seconds, which makes it suitable for a broad range of neuroscientific applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.058

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For ROI analysis, selected areas are manually drawn, which is more time consuming, requires a priori anatomical localization, and is prone to bias.

    “For ROI analysis, selected areas are manually drawn, which is more time consuming, requires a priori anatomical localization, and is prone to bias [48].”

    From Diffusion tensor imaging reveals whole-brain microstructural changes in the P301L mouse model of tauopathy. (2020) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Discussion describes computation time for diffusion-MRI model fitting, not time spent drawing ROIs. Searches for manual ROI delineation, anatomical localization, and selection bias found no passage addressing those claims in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Alexander, D.C., Zikic, D., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Criminisi, A., 2014. Image quality transfer via random forest regression: applications in diffusion mri. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2014. Springer, pp. 225-232.
  2. Anderson, A.W., 2005. Measurement of fiber orientation distributions using high angular resolution diffusion imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 54 (5), 1194-1206.
  3. Assaf, Y., Basser, P.J., 2005. Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (charmed) mr imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 27 (1), 48-58.
  4. Basser, P.J., Pajevic, S., Pierpaoli, C., Duda, J., Aldroubi, A., 2000. In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn. Reson Med. 44 (4), 625-632, [20481737 0740-3194 Journal Article].
  5. Blow, N., 2008. Neuroscience tools: brain insights. Nat. Methods 5 (11), 981-987.
  6. Calamante, F., Tournier, J.-D., Jackson, G.D., Connelly, A., 2010. Track-density imaging (tdi): super-resolution white matter imaging using whole-brain track-density mapping. Neuroimage 53 (4), 1233-1243.
  7. Callaghan, P., Jolley, K., Lelievre, J., 1979. Diffusion of water in the endosperm tissue of wheat grains as studied by pulsed field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance. Biophys. J. 28 (1), 133-141.
  8. Dhital, B., Kellner, E., Reisert, M., Kiselev, V.G., 2015. Isotropic diffusion weighting provides insight on diffusion compartments in human brain white matter in vivo. In: Proceedings of the 23th ISMRM Annual Meeting, Toronto. p. 2788.
  9. Fieremans, E., Jensen, J., Helpern, J., 2011. White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroimage 58 (1), 177-188.
  10. Friston, K.J., Ashburner, J.T., Kiebel, S.J., Nichols, T.E., Penny, W.D. (Eds.), 2007. Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images. Elsevier.
  11. Golkov, V., Dosovitskiy, A., Sämann, P., Sperl, J.I., Sprenger, T., Czisch, M., Menzel, M.I., Gómez, P.A., Haase, A., Brox, T., et al., 2015. q-space deep learning for twelve-fold shorter and model-free diffusion mri scans. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2015. Springer, pp. 37-44.
  12. Jespersen, S.N., Kroenke, C.D., Østergaard, L., Ackerman, J.J., Yablonskiy, D.A., 2007. Modeling dendrite density from magnetic resonance diffusion measurements. Neuroimage 34 (4), 1473-1486.
  13. Jespersen, S.N., Lundell, H., Sonderby, C.K., Dyrby, T.B., 2013. Orientationally invariant metrics of apparent compartment eccentricity from double pulsed field gradient diffusion experiments. NMR Biomed. 26 (12), 1647-1662.
  14. Kazhdan, M., Funkhouser, T., Rusinkiewicz, S., 2003. Rotation invariant spherical harmonic represenation of 3d shape descriptors. In: Kobbelt, L., Schï¿rer, P., Hoppe, H. (Eds.). In: Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing.
  15. Kellner, E., Dhital, B., Reisert, M., 2015. Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.07758 · arXiv
  16. Mangin, J., 2002. A framework based on spin glass models for the inference of anatomical connectivity from diffusion-weighted mr data -a technical review. NMR Biomed. 15 (7-8), 481-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.780. · DOI
  17. Mori, S., Crain, B.J., Chacko, V.P., van Zijl, P.C., 1999. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann. Neurol. 45 (2), 265-269, [99142739 0364-5134 Journal Article].
  18. Murphy, K.P., 2012. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. MIT press.
  19. Nedjati-Gilani, G.L., Schneider, T., Hall, M.G., Wheeler-Kingshott, C.A., Alexander, D.C., 2014. Machine learning based compartment models with permeability for white matter microstructure imaging. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2014. Springer, pp. 257-264.
  20. Novikov, D.S., Jelescu, I.O., Fieremans, E., June 2015. From diffusion signal moments to neurite diffusivities, volume fraction and orientation distribution: an exact solution. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Toronto, Canada, p. 469.
  21. Panagiotaki, E., Schneider, T., Siow, B., Hall, M.G., Lythgoe, M.F., Alexander, D.C., 2012. Compartment models of the diffusion MR signal in brain white matter: a taxonomy and comparison. Neuroimage 59 (3), 2241-2254.
  22. Parker, G.J.M., Haroon, H.A., Wheeler-Kingshott, C.A.M., 2003. A framework for a streamline-based probabilistic index of connectivity (pico) using a structural interpretation of mri diffusion measurements. J. Magn. Reson Imaging 18 (2), 242-254, [english 1053-1807].
  23. Reisert, M., Kiselev, V., Dihtal, B., Kellner, E., Novikov, D., 2014. Mesoft: Unifying diffusion modelling and fiber tracking. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2014. Springer, pp. 201-208.
  24. Tournier, J., Calamante, F., Gadian, D., Connelly, A., 2007. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion mri: non-negativity constrained super- resolved spherical deconvolution. NeuroImage 35 (4), 1459-1472.
  25. Walsh, D.O., Gmitro, A.F., Marcellin, M.W., 2000. Adaptive reconstruction of phased array mr imagery. Magn. Reson. Med. 43 (5), 682-690.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reisert, M., Kellner, E., Dhital, B., Hennig, J., & Kiselev, V. G.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Reisert, Marco
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
147
Pages
964-975
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2538791563
Cited by
197
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15
FWCI
18.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG RE 3286/2-1, DFG KI 1089/3-2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
diffusion MRI, mesoscopic structure, Bayesian estimation, microstructure modeling, supervised learning, brain tissue structure
MeSH terms
Adult, Bayes Theorem, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Neurological, Neurites, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review