Cited by 279Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFractional Differential Equations SolutionsAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

Anomalous Diffusion in Purkinje Cell Dendrites Caused by Spines

Open access
Santamaria, Fidel, Wils, Stefan, De Schutter, Erik, Augustine, George J.·2006·Neuron

Abstract

We combined local photolysis of caged compounds with fluorescence imaging to visualize molecular diffusion within dendrites of cerebellar Purkinje cells. Diffusion of a volume marker, fluorescein dextran, within spiny dendrites was remarkably slow in comparison to its diffusion in smooth dendrites. Computer simulations indicate that this retardation is due to a transient trapping of molecules within dendritic spines, yielding anomalous diffusion. We considered the influence of spine trapping on the diffusion of calcium ions (Ca(2+)) and inositol-1,4,5-triphospate (IP(3)), two synaptic second messengers. Diffusion of IP(3) was strongly influenced by the presence of dendritic spines, while Ca(2+) was removed so rapidly that it could not diffuse far enough to be trapped. We conclude that an important function of dendritic spines may be to trap chemical signals and thereby create slowed anomalous diffusion within dendrites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.025

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BDNF action was selective on the spines that showed immediate enlargement, which may act as the structural tag for selective trapping of the protein-synthetic machinery and the capture of plasticity proteins for long-term spine-head enlargement.

    “BDNF action was selective on the spines that showed immediate enlargement, which may act as the structural tag for selective trapping (26) of the protein-synthetic machinery (11, 27) and the capture of plasticity proteins (2, 28) for long-term spine-head enlargement.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santamaria, F., Wils, S., De Schutter, E., & Augustine, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Augustine, George J.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
635-648
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156961733
Cited by
279
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 65473, R24GM065473)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS034045, NS34045)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Fractional Differential Equations Solutions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Keywords
anomalous diffusion, dendritic spines, Purkinje cell dendrites, cerebellum, calcium diffusion, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, fluorescein dextran, dendritic transport
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Cerebellar Cortex, Diffusion, Models, Molecular, Synaptic Transmission, Organ Culture Techniques, Purkinje Cells, Synaptic Membranes, Second Messenger Systems, Signal Transduction, Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate, Fluorescein, Dendritic Spines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review