Cited by 787Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCell Image Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

Array tomography: a new tool for imaging the molecular architecture and ultrastructure of neural circuits

Open access
Micheva, Kristina D., Smith, Stephen J·2007·Neuron

Abstract

Many biological functions depend critically upon fine details of tissue molecular architecture that have resisted exploration by existing imaging techniques. This is particularly true for nervous system tissues, where information processing function depends on intricate circuit and synaptic architectures. Here, we describe a new imaging method, called array tomography, which combines and extends superlative features of modern optical fluorescence and electron microscopy methods. Based on methods for constructing and repeatedly staining and imaging ordered arrays of ultrathin (50-200 nm), resin-embedded serial sections on glass microscope slides, array tomography allows for quantitative, high-resolution, large-field volumetric imaging of large numbers of antigens, fluorescent proteins, and ultrastructure in individual tissue specimens. Compared to confocal microscopy, array tomography offers the advantage of better spatial resolution, in particular along the z axis, as well as depth-independent immunofluorescent staining. The application of array tomography can reveal important but previously unseen features of brain molecular architecture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.014

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Array tomography is a powerful tool for high resolution imaging and quantification of synaptic density in vivo.

    “using array tomography (AT), a powerful tool for high resolution imaging and quantification of synaptic density in vivo (Greer et al., 2010; Margolis et al., 2010; Micheva and Smith, 2007; Ross et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Micheva, K. D., & Smith, S. J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Micheva, Kristina D.
  • Smith, Stephen J
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
25-36
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145504425
Cited by
787
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 47
FWCI
15.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2007-09-06)
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience
  • G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
array tomography, neural circuits, synaptic structure, ultrastructure, volumetric imaging, serial sectioning, immunofluorescence, fluorescent proteins, z-axis resolution, electron microscopy
MeSH terms
Animals, Diagnostic Imaging, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Fluorescent Dyes, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Nerve Net, Neurology, Tissue Embedding, Synapsins, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Microscopy, Confocal, Photobleaching, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review