Cited by 27Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCell Image Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

Sub-diffraction Limit Localization of Proteins in Volumetric Space Using Bayesian Restoration of Fluorescence Images from Ultrathin Specimens

Open access
Wang, Gordon, Smith, Stephen J.·2012·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

Photon diffraction limits the resolution of conventional light microscopy at the lateral focal plane to 0.61λ/NA (λ = wavelength of light, NA = numerical aperture of the objective) and at the axial plane to 1.4nλ/NA(2) (n = refractive index of the imaging medium, 1.51 for oil immersion), which with visible wavelengths and a 1.4NA oil immersion objective is -220 nm and -600 nm in the lateral plane and axial plane respectively. This volumetric resolution is too large for the proper localization of protein clustering in subcellular structures. Here we combine the newly developed proteomic imaging technique, Array Tomography (AT), with its native 50-100 nm axial resolution achieved by physical sectioning of resin embedded tissue, and a 2D maximum likelihood deconvolution method, based on Bayes' rule, which significantly improves the resolution of protein puncta in the lateral plane to allow accurate and fast computational segmentation and analysis of labeled proteins. The physical sectioning of AT allows tissue specimens to be imaged at the physical optimum of modern high NA plan-apochormatic objectives. This translates to images that have little out of focus light, minimal aberrations and wave-front distortions. Thus, AT is able to provide images with truly invariant point spread functions (PSF), a property critical for accurate deconvolution. We show that AT with deconvolution increases the volumetric analytical fidelity of protein localization by significantly improving the modulation of high spatial frequencies up to and potentially beyond the spatial frequency cut-off of the objective. Moreover, we are able to achieve this improvement with no noticeable introduction of noise or artifacts and arrive at object segmentation and localization accuracies on par with image volumes captured using commercial implementations of super-resolution microscopes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002671

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Astrocytes engulf synaptic material immunolabeled for presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins.

    “Using Array Tomography (AT), a super-resolution imaging technique visualizing synaptic protein expression with sub-100nm volumetric resolution20, we found that astrocytes engulfed much of the CTB-labeled debris as well as synaptic material immunolabeled for both presynaptic (Bassoon) and postsynaptic (PSD-95 and GluR1) proteins (Extended Data Fig. 5).”

    From Astrocytes mediate synapse elimination through MEGF10 and MERTK pathways (2013) · cites this paper as [20]

    Citation 20 is attached to the description of array tomography, not to the citing authors’ finding that astrocytes engulf synaptic material. The Introduction identifies array tomography as a technique for immunolabeling proteins in ultrathin sections, but specifies 50–100 nm axial resolution while noting that lateral resolution remains diffraction-limited at approximately 200 nm. It therefore does not establish sub-100 nm resolution throughout the volume. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]Agard Da, Hiraoka Y, Shaw P, Sedat JW (1989) Fluorescence microscopy in three dimensions. Methods Cell Biol 30: 353– 77. 2494418
  2. [9]Wilson T (2011) Resolution and optical sectioning in the confocal microscope. J Microsc 244: 113– 121. 22004276

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, G., & Smith, S. J.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Gordon
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2012-08-30
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
e1002671
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2070385263
Cited by
27
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (43667)
  • FRAXA Research Foundation
  • Grass Foundation
  • G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundation
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS062798, R01NS075252, R21NS063210, R01NS077601)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
protein localization, array tomography, maximum-likelihood deconvolution, Bayesian image restoration, point spread function, protein clustering, image segmentation, super-resolution microscopy, ultrathin sections, subcellular structures
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Tomography, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review