Cited by 61Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchRetinal Development and Disorders

How diverse retinal functions arise from feedback at the first visual synapse

Open access
Drinnenberg, Antonia, Franke, Felix, Morikawa, Rei K., Jüttner, Josephine, Hillier, Daniel, Hantz, Peter, Hierlemann, Andreas, Azeredo da Silveira, Rava +1 more·2018·Neuron

Abstract

Many brain regions contain local interneurons of distinct types. How does an interneuron type contribute to the input-output transformations of a given brain region? We addressed this question in the mouse retina by chemogenetically perturbing horizontal cells, an interneuron type providing feedback at the first visual synapse, while monitoring the light-driven spiking activity in thousands of ganglion cells, the retinal output neurons. We uncovered six reversible perturbation-induced effects in the response dynamics and response range of ganglion cells. The effects were enhancing or suppressive, occurred in different response epochs, and depended on the ganglion cell type. A computational model of the retinal circuitry reproduced all perturbation-induced effects and led us to assign specific functions to horizontal cells with respect to different ganglion cell types. Our combined experimental and theoretical work reveals how a single interneuron type can differentially shape the dynamical properties of distinct output channels of a brain region.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.001

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observation that the 300 s preconditioning stimulus produced a dopaminergic response at light offset is consistent with rebound excitation exhibited by light-adapted OFF and ON-OFF retinal ganglion cells when a prolonged light stimulus is discontinued.

    “This observation is consistent with rebound excitation exhibited by light-adapted OFF and ON-OFF retinal ganglion cells when a prolonged light stimulus is discontinued (Tikidji-Hamburyan et al., 2015; Drinnenberg et al., 2018).”

    From Ventral striatum dopamine release encodes unique properties of visual stimuli in mice (2023) · cites this paper as Drinnenberg et al., 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drinnenberg, A., Franke, F., Morikawa, R. K., Jüttner, J., Hillier, D., Hantz, P., Hierlemann, A., Azeredo da Silveira, R., & Roska, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Roska, Botond
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
117-134.e11
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809379800
Cited by
61
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (CRSII3_141801)
  • Ambizione (PZ00P3_167989)
  • NCCR “Molecular Systems Engineering”
  • CNRS (UMR8559)
  • ERC (267351, 694829, 669157)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
horizontal cells, retinal ganglion cells, feedback, response dynamics, ganglion cell types, retinal circuitry, computational model, input-output transformation
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Feedback, Interneurons, Models, Neurological, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Synapses, Vision, Ocular, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, Retinal Bipolar Cells, Retinal Horizontal Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review