Cited by 134Visual perception and processing mechanismsRetinal Development and DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Retinal output changes qualitatively with every change in ambient illuminance

Open access
Tikidji-Hamburyan, Alexandra, Reinhard, Katja, Seitter, Hartwig, Hovhannisyan, Anahit, Procyk, Christopher A, Allen, Annette E, Schenk, Martin, Lucas, Robert J +1 more·2015·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The collective activity pattern of retinal ganglion cells, the retinal code, underlies higher visual processing. How does the ambient illuminance of the visual scene influence this retinal output? We recorded from isolated mouse and pig retina and from mouse dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in vivo at up to seven ambient light levels covering the scotopic to photopic regimes. Across each luminance transition, most ganglion cells exhibited qualitative response changes, whereas they maintained stable responses within each luminance. We commonly observed the appearance and disappearance of ON responses in OFF cells and vice versa. Such qualitative response changes occurred for a variety of stimuli, including full-field and localized contrast steps and naturalistic movies. Our results suggest that the retinal code is not fixed but varies with every change of ambient luminance. This finding raises questions about signal processing within the retina and has implications for visual processing in higher brain areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3891

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observation that the 300 s preconditioning stimulus produced a dopaminergic response at light offset is consistent with rebound excitation exhibited by light-adapted OFF and ON-OFF retinal ganglion cells when a prolonged light stimulus is discontinued.

    “This observation is consistent with rebound excitation exhibited by light-adapted OFF and ON-OFF retinal ganglion cells when a prolonged light stimulus is discontinued (Tikidji-Hamburyan et al., 2015; Drinnenberg et al., 2018).”

    From Ventral striatum dopamine release encodes unique properties of visual stimuli in mice (2023) · cites this paper as Tikidji-Hamburyan et al., 2015

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [50]Paxinos G FK The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 2001 Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tikidji-Hamburyan, A., Reinhard, K., Seitter, H., Hovhannisyan, A., Procyk, C. A., Allen, A. E., Schenk, M., Lucas, R. J., & Münch, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Münch, Thomas A
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2014-12-08
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
66-74
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2018243434
Cited by
134
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I007296/1, BBSRC BB/1007296/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
retinal ganglion cells, ON and OFF responses, ambient illuminance, dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus, luminance adaptation, mouse retina, pig retina
MeSH terms
Animals, Environment, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Lighting, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Retina, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Swine, Mice, Knockout, GABA Antagonists, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, Mice, Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation Channels, Electrophysiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review