Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individual Variation in Functional Topography of Association Networks in Youth

Open access
Cui, Zaixu, Li, Hongming, Xia, Cedric H., Larsen, Bart, Adebimpe, Azeez, Baum, Graham L., Cieslak, Matt, Gur, Raquel E., Gur, Ruben C., Moore, Tyler M., Oathes, Desmond J., Alexander-Bloch, Aaron F., Raznahan, Armin, Roalf, David R., Shinohara, Russell T., Wolf, Daniel H., Davatzikos, Christos, Bassett, Danielle S., Fair, Damien A., Fan, Yong, Satterthwaite, Theodore D.·2020·Neuron

Abstract

SUMMARY The spatial distribution of large-scale functional networks on the cerebral cortex differs between individuals, and is particularly variable in association networks that are responsible for higher-order cognition. However, it remains unknown how this functional topography evolves in development and supports cognition. Capitalizing upon advances in machine learning and a large sample imaged with 27 minutes of high-quality fMRI data (n = 693, ages 8-23y), we delineate how functional topography evolves during youth. We found that the functional topography of association networks is refined with age, allowing accurate prediction of unseen individuals’ brain maturity. The cortical representation of association networks predicts individual differences in executive function. Finally, variability of functional topography is associated with fundamental properties of brain organization including evolutionary expansion, cortical myelination, and cerebral blood flow. Our results emphasize the importance of considering both the plasticity and diversity of functional neuroanatomy during development, and suggest advances in personalized therapeutics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.029

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 106 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Cui, Z., Li, H., Xia, C. H., Larsen, B., Adebimpe, A., Baum, G. L., Cieslak, M., Gur, R. E., Gur, R. C., Moore, T. M., Oathes, D. J., Alexander-Bloch, A. F., Raznahan, A., Roalf, D. R., Shinohara, R. T., Wolf, D. H., Davatzikos, C., Bassett, D. S., Fair, D. A., Fan, Y., & Satterthwaite, T. D.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
106
Issue
2
Pages
340-353.e8
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006922697
Cited by
269
References
106
FWCI
16.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual Variation in Functional Topography of Association Networks in Youth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.029
The paper
Cui, Z., Li, H., Xia, C. H., Larsen, B., Adebimpe, A., Baum, G. L., Cieslak, M., Gur, R. E., Gur, R. C., Moore, T. M., Oathes, D. J., Alexander-Bloch, A. F., Raznahan, A., Roalf, D. R., Shinohara, R. T., Wolf, D. H., Davatzikos, C., Bassett, D. S., Fair, D. A., . . . Satterthwaite, T. D. (2020). Individual Variation in Functional Topography of Association Networks in Youth. Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.029

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.