Cited by 683Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Towards a universal taxonomy of macro-scale functional human brain networks

Open access
Uddin, Lucina Q., Yeo, B. T. Thomas, Spreng, R. Nathan·2019·Brain Topography

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed a proliferation of studies aimed at characterizing the human connectome. These projects map the brain regions comprising large-scale systems underlying cognition using non-invasive neuroimaging approaches and advanced analytic techniques adopted from network science. While the idea that the human brain is composed of multiple macro-scale functional networks has been gaining traction in cognitive neuroscience, the field has yet to reach consensus on several key issues regarding terminology. What constitutes a functional brain network? Are there "core" functional networks, and if so, what are their spatial topographies? What naming conventions, if universally adopted, will provide the most utility and facilitate communication amongst researchers? Can a taxonomy of functional brain networks be delineated? Here we survey the current landscape to identify six common macro-scale brain network naming schemes and conventions utilized in the literature, highlighting inconsistencies and points of confusion where appropriate. As a minimum recommendation upon which to build, we propose that a scheme incorporating anatomical terminology should provide the foundation for a taxonomy of functional brain networks. A logical starting point in this endeavor might delineate systems that we refer to here as "occipital", "pericentral", "dorsal frontoparietal", "lateral frontoparietal", "midcingulo-insular", and "medial frontoparietal" networks. We posit that as the field of network neuroscience matures, it will become increasingly imperative to arrive at a taxonomy such as that proposed here, that can be consistently referenced across research groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10548-019-00744-6

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decades of functional neuroimaging work have delineated the executive control/lateral frontoparietal and salience/midcingulo-insular networks as brain networks underlying executive functions that contribute to cognitive flexibility.

    “Decades of functional neuroimaging work has delineated brain networks underlying EFs that contribute to cognitive flexibility (21,22), namely the executive control/lateral frontoparietal (L-FPN) and salience/midcingulo-insular networks (M-CIN) (23–25).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uddin, L. Q., Yeo, B. T. T., & Spreng, R. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Uddin, Lucina Q.
  • Spreng, R. Nathan
Venue
Brain Topography
Published
2019-11
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
926-942
ISSN
  • 0896-0267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6792
OpenAlex
W2985441701
Cited by
683
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 140 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Topography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH107549)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
functional brain networks, human connectome, anatomical terminology, terminology standardization
MeSH terms
Brain, Classification, Cognition, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Neuroimaging, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review