Cited by 7Cellular transport and secretionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Molecule-to-Circuit Disease Mechanisms of a Synaptic SNAREopathy

Open access
Praschberger, Roman, Jacquemyn, Julie, Verstreken, Patrik·2021·Neuron

Abstract

Alten et al. present a detailed investigation of disease-causing SNAP25 mutations based on structural analysis, neurotransmitter release, and emerging circuit properties. They show that structurally clustered mutations within the SNAP25 SNARE motif cause similar functional defects and predict that alterations of spontaneous release are a novel disease mechanism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.12.009

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Area 24 and its projection target region in the caudate nucleus in marmosets are implicated in the detection/expression of changes in action-outcome contingencies for reward.

    “More recently, area 24 and projection target region in the caudate nucleus in marmosets have also been implicated in the detection/expression of changes in actionoutcome contingencies for reward [206].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [206]

    The cited paper’s passages on pp. 1–2 discuss SNAP25 mutations and neurotransmitter release, not reward-related action–outcome contingencies. Searches for area 24, the marmoset caudate nucleus, and reward contingencies found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Failure to detect changes in action-outcome contingencies (associated with disrupted areas 32/24 in monkeys and PLc in rodents) could contribute to negative biases in approach-avoidance decision making and despair/helplessness.

    “a failure to detect changes in the contingencies between one's actions and their outcome (associated with disrupted function in both areas 32 and 24 in monkeys [206] and PLc in rodents [205,250]) could contribute not only to negative biases in approach-avoidance decision making but also despair/helplessness [232].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [206]

    The cited paper’s discussion of SNAP25 mutations and neurotransmitter release (pp. 1–2) does not address the claim’s proposed link to despair or helplessness. Searches for action–outcome contingencies, approach–avoidance decisions, and areas 32/24 or PLc found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Central OFC regions may contribute via updating predictive stimuli involved in Pavlovian-to-Instrumental transfer.

    “Different again may be the contribution of regions within central OFC, with their links to the updating of predictive stimuli which may be involved in the mechanisms by which predictive stimuli can influence goal-directed actions, known as Pavlovian-to-Instrumental transfer [206,235].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [206]

    The cited paper’s discussion of SNAP25 mutations and synaptic transmission (Molecule-to-Circuit Disease Mechanisms of a Synaptic SNAREopathy, pp. 1–2) does not address central OFC, predictive-stimulus updating, or Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer. Searches for those terms and for goal-directed actions found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Praschberger, R., Jacquemyn, J., & Verstreken, P.
Affiliations
VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE)
Corresponding author
Verstreken, Patrik
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
1-3
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119399676
Cited by
7
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
SNAP-25, SNARE proteins, neurotransmitter release, spontaneous release, synaptic transmission, disease mechanisms
MeSH terms
Brain Diseases, Humans, Membrane Fusion, Synaptic Transmission, Protein Binding, SNARE Proteins, Synaptosomal-Associated Protein 25

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review