Deletion of SPI1 in microglia exacerbates amyloid pathology by impairing microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease models
Open accessAbstract
Recent human genetic studies have highlighted the potential role of microglial genes and their regulatory functions in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The transcription factor PU.1 (encoded by SPI1) is expressed mainly in microglia in the central nervous system and has been reported to be a genetic risk factor for AD. However, the role of microglial SPI1 in AD etiology is still poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the selective deletion of Spi1 in microglia exacerbates AD-related pathologies in an amyloid mouse model. Specifically, microglial Spi1 deletion increases amyloid deposition, gliosis, and dystrophic neurites, while decreasing the microglial response to plaques. By combining proteomics and functional analyses, we revealed that the loss of microglial Spi1 impairs phagocytosis through Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1. Directly activating these genes rescues the impaired Aβ uptake caused by Spi1 knockdown.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Microglia-specific deletion of Spi1 in an amyloid mouse model worsened Aβ accumulation, plaque deposition, gliosis, and dystrophic neurites while reducing microglial plaque coverage and phagocytosis. The phenotype was linked to lower expression of Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1, and restoring these factors rescued impaired Aβ uptake in vitro.
Key findings
- Conditional Spi1 deletion lowered Spi1 mRNA by 33.7%, SPI1 protein by 29.8%, and SPI1-positive microglia by 42.7%, without changing IBA1-positive microglial density, though microglial branching was reduced.
- In Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice, insoluble Aβ40/Aβ42 rose 1.48-/1.31-fold in cortex and 2.11-/1.67-fold in hippocampus; soluble PBS Aβ40/Aβ42 rose 1.58-/1.47-fold and RIPA Aβ40/Aβ42 rose 1.38-/1.37-fold. Plaque load increased 1.52-fold in cortex and 1.65-fold in hippocampus, and fibrillar plaque load increased 1.69- and 2.08-fold, respectively.
- Gliosis and neuritic damage worsened: IBA1 area 1.51-fold, IBA1 cells 1.36-fold, Gal-3 area 1.80-fold, GFAP area 2.39-fold, GFAP cells 1.57-fold, LAMP1+ cluster load 1.72-/2.06-fold, and neuritic plaques 1.45-/2.05-fold in cortex/hippocampus. Plaque coverage by IBA1+ microglia fell 22.7%, in vivo MeX04 uptake MFI decreased, and in vitro fAβ uptake fell 54.3%, 67.3%, and 75.7% at 4, 8, and 24 hours; zymosan uptake fell 33.1%.
- Proteomics quantified 9,592 peptides from 9,084 genes and 199 differentially expressed proteins, with phagocytosis as a top network. Overexpressing Syk, Lyn, or Fcgr1 restored Aβ uptake in BV-2 cells, and Syk or Fcgr1 restored it in primary microglia; Lyn overexpression was not achieved in primary microglia.
Methods
- The authors crossed Spi1fl/fl mice with Cx3cr1-CreERT2 mice to achieve tamoxifen-inducible microglial Spi1 deletion, with and without the APPPS1–21 transgene. Tamoxifen was given intraperitoneally for 5 days at 4 or 7 weeks of age, and mice were assessed at 2 or 4 months; sample size targeted at least 11 mice per genotype based on power 0.8, α = 0.05, and a 40% effect size for insoluble Aβ42.
- Analyses included Aβ electrochemiluminescence assays, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence with image quantification, in vivo methoxy-X04 phagocytosis flow cytometry, primary microglia and BV-2 in vitro fAβ-pHrodo and zymosan uptake assays, qPCR, Western blot, TMT mass-spectrometry proteomics, pathway/network enrichment, STRING interaction analysis, and rescue experiments overexpressing candidate Spi1 targets.
- Statistics used two-tailed unpaired t-tests, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test, and Pearson correlation; after finding no sex-dependent effects on insoluble Aβ42, subsequent experiments used male mice, which made up the larger cohort.
Limitations
- The paper states that the modest SPI1 reduction is a strength rather than a limitation, but acknowledges possible off-target Spi1 changes in long-lived perivascular macrophages. It also notes that Cx3cr1-CreERT2 can have tamoxifen-independent leakiness, which the authors addressed with non-floxed controls and tamoxifen treatment in both groups, and that Lyn overexpression could not be achieved in primary microglia for technical reasons.
- The text makes evident that Cx3cr1-CreERT2 is not exclusively microglial, so peripheral myeloid or perivascular effects cannot be fully excluded; proteomics was performed on bulk cortical tissue rather than isolated microglia; and the mechanistic rescue evidence comes from in vitro systems, with no human tissue validation reported.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
49 of 67 cited sources checked · 26 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The transcription factor PU.1, encoded by SPI1, is expressed mainly in microglia in the central nervous system.
“The transcription factor PU.1 (encoded by SPI1) is expressed mainly in microglia in the central nervous system”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“SPI1, a transcription factor highly enriched in microglia within the CNS3,7–10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 5 sources checked- cites [3] Kunkle, 2019, Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing, Nat. Genet. source
The Results section on candidate gene prioritization names SPI1 as an implicated gene and discusses microglial expression of genes generally, but does not say that SPI1 encodes PU.1 or that PU.1 is expressed mainly in microglia. Searches for PU.1, SPI1, and microglial expression found no passage establishing that specific claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [7] Huang, 2017, A common haplotype lowers PU.1 expression in myeloid cells and delays onset of Alzheimer's disease, Nat. Neurosci. source
- cites [8] Kierdorf, 2013, Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways, Nat. Neurosci. source
- cites [9] Walton, 2000, PU.1 expression in microglia, J. Neuroimmunol. source
- cites [10] Lloberas, 1999, The key role of PU.1/SPI-1 in B cells, myeloid cells and macrophages, Immunol. Today source
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
- Premisecitation
Recent Alzheimer's disease genome-wide association studies identified new risk loci whose candidate genes are involved in innate immune functions.
“recent AD genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified several new genetic risk loci for AD3,4, with candidate risk genes at these loci being involved in innate immune functions4,5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [3] Kunkle, 2019, Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing, Nat. Genet. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- cites [4] Wightman, 2021, A genome-wide association study with 1,126,563 individuals identifies new risk loci for Alzheimer’s disease, Nat. Genet. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- cites [5] Andrews, 2023, The complex genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease: novel insights and future directions, EBiomedicine sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
SPI1 has been reported to be a genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease.
“has been reported to be a genetic risk factor for AD”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“Among the emerging microglia-associated risk factors for AD is SPI1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 5 sources checked- cites [3] Kunkle, 2019, Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing, Nat. Genet. source
- cites [7] Huang, 2017, A common haplotype lowers PU.1 expression in myeloid cells and delays onset of Alzheimer's disease, Nat. Neurosci. source
- cites [8] Kierdorf, 2013, Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways, Nat. Neurosci. source
- cites [9] Walton, 2000, PU.1 expression in microglia, J. Neuroimmunol. source
- cites [10] Lloberas, 1999, The key role of PU.1/SPI-1 in B cells, myeloid cells and macrophages, Immunol. Today source
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
- Premisecitation
Activated microglia have been implicated in clearing Aβ through phagocytosis.
“These activated microglia have been implicated in the clearance of Aβ through phagocytosis23,24.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Karahan, 2021, Deletion of Abi3 gene locus exacerbates neuropathological features of Alzheimer's disease in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis, Sci. Adv. source
- cites [24] Condello, 2015, Microglia constitute a barrier that prevents neurotoxic protofibrillar Aβ42 hotspots around plaques, Nat. Commun. source
- Premisecitation
Activated microglia surround amyloid plaques in human Alzheimer's disease and mouse Aβ amyloidosis models.
“Activated microglia surround amyloid plaques in the brains of both human patients with AD and mouse models of Aβ amyloidosis13,15,21,22.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [13] Radde, 2006, Abeta42-driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology, EMBO Rep. source
The Amyloid-associated neuroinflammation and pathology section and Fig. 4 caption report activated, hypertrophic microglia clustered around amyloid plaques in APPPS1-21 mice (page not provided). The paper compares mouse plaque appearance with human AD plaques, but the passages do not establish that activated microglia surround plaques in human patients. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [15] Cole, 2007, The Alzheimer's disease β-secretase enzyme, BACE1, Mol. Neurodegener. source
The BACE1 expression section discusses reactive astrocytes around plaques and glial activation, while the BACE1 dysregulation section describes neuronal BACE1 immunoreactivity surrounding plaque cores in transgenic mice and human AD brain. Searches for microglia around plaques and activated microglia found no passage saying that activated microglia surround plaques in either setting. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [21] Lista, 2024, Tracking neuroinflammatory biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: a strategy for individualized therapeutic approaches?, J. Neuroinflamm. source
The section ‘The role of microglia and astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology’ states that microglia become activated during AD and surround plaques and fibrils. It does not establish that this occurs in mouse Aβ amyloidosis models; a search for ‘mouse models’ found no passage supporting that part of the claim. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] Stalder, 1999, Association of Microglia with Amyloid Plaques in Brains of APP23 Transgenic Mice, Am. J. Pathol. source
- Premisecitation
Neurites around amyloid plaques are enriched in LAMP1 in human dementia and mouse Alzheimer's disease models.
“Recent studies have shown that neurites surrounding amyloid plaques are enriched in the lysosomal marker, lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1) in both human patients with dementia and mouse models of AD29,30.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Ulrich, 2018, ApoE facilitates the microglial response to amyloid plaque pathology, J. Exp. Med. source
The section “Increased neuritic dystrophy in Apoe -/-;APP PS1 mice” reports dystrophic neurites around plaques in mouse models. It labels those neurites with an APP antibody, however, and does not establish LAMP1 enrichment or report the claimed finding in humans (page not provided). (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [30] Gowrishankar, 2015, Massive accumulation of luminal protease-deficient axonal lysosomes at Alzheimer’s disease amyloid plaques, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
- Premisecitation
PU.1 may orchestrate expression of multiple target genes involved in phagocytosis and immune responses.
“As a transcription factor, PU.1 may orchestrate the expression of multiple target genes involved in phagocytosis and immune responses39–41.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [39] Satoh, 2014, A Comprehensive Profile of ChIP-Seq-Based PU.1/Spi1 Target Genes in Microglia, Gene Regul. Syst. Biol. source
- cites [40] Zhou, 2019, Transcriptional mechanism of IRF8 and PU.1 governs microglial activation in neurodegenerative condition, Protein Cell sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- cites [41] Jones, 2021, Modest changes in Spi1 dosage reveal the potential for altered microglial function as seen in Alzheimer’s disease, Sci. Rep. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
SPI1 expression has a low correlation between peripheral monocytes and brain microglia.
“However, a recent study showed that SPI1 expression has a low correlation between peripheral monocytes and brain microglia60.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Karahan, 2023, The effect of Abi3 locus deletion on the progression of Alzheimer’s disease-related pathologies, Front. Immunol. source
The Introduction discusses ABI3 as a microglia-enriched gene, and the Results examine microglia in Abi3 knock-out mice. Neither section reports a comparison of SPI1 expression between peripheral monocytes and brain microglia. Searches for SPI1, PU.1, monocytes, and the claimed correlation found no passage addressing it. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The Cx3cr1CreER line can show spontaneous Cre activity without tamoxifen.
“This Cre line has been reported to exhibit spontaneous leakiness even without tamoxifen injection48,49.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion increases amyloid deposition in APPPS1-21 mice.
“microglial Spi1 deletion increases amyloid deposition, gliosis, and dystrophic neurites, while decreasing the microglial response to plaques”
- Also stated in: § Loss of microglial Spi1 expression increases amyloid plaque deposition · boosted
“Taken together, these data demonstrate that microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increases amyloid plaque deposition in the brains of APPPS1–21 mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Loss of microglial Spi1 expression increases amyloid plaque deposition · boosted
- Findingown data
Post-maturational Spi1 deletion did not change microglial density in cortex, hippocampus, striatum, or thalamus at 4 weeks after tamoxifen.
“The number of IBA1+ cells was not altered by the loss of the microglial Spi1 gene in multiple brain regions, such as the cortex, hippocampus, striatum, and thalamus, 4 weeks after final tamoxifen injection (Figures 1F–1I, respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion increases dystrophic neurites in APPPS1-21 mice.
“microglial Spi1 deletion increases amyloid deposition, gliosis, and dystrophic neurites, while decreasing the microglial response to plaques”
- Also stated in: § Loss of microglial Spi1 exacerbates axonal dystrophy and increases neuritic plaques in APPPS1–21 mice · boosted
“These results demonstrate that microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increases the extent of dystrophic neurites and the number of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Loss of microglial Spi1 exacerbates axonal dystrophy and increases neuritic plaques in APPPS1–21 mice · boosted
- Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion decreases the microglial response to plaques.
“while decreasing the microglial response to plaques”
- Also stated in: § SPI1 deletion in microglia reduces the microglial surrounding plaques and decreases phagocytic activity · plain
“The area of plaque covered by the IBA1+ microglial cluster was significantly reduced by 22.7% in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figure 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § SPI1 deletion in microglia reduces the microglial surrounding plaques and decreases phagocytic activity · plain
- Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion increases gliosis in APPPS1-21 mice.
“microglial Spi1 deletion increases amyloid deposition, gliosis, and dystrophic neurites, while decreasing the microglial response to plaques”
- Also stated in: § Deletion of Spi1 in microglia increases microgliosis and astrogliosis · plain
“Deletion of Spi1 in microglia increases microgliosis and astrogliosis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Deletion of Spi1 in microglia increases microgliosis and astrogliosis · plain
- Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion reduces the number of microglial branches.
“skeleton analysis revealed a significant reduction in microglial processes in the brains of Spi1ΔMG mice, as indicated by a decreased number of microglial branches (Figures S1C and S1D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The number of SPI1-positive microglia in the cortical area was decreased by 42.7% in Spi1ΔMG mice compared with Spi1wt mice.
“the number of SPI1-positive (+) microglia (SPI1+IBA1+) in the cortical area was significantly decreased by 42.7% in Spi1ΔMG mice (Figure S1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spi1 deletion did not affect IBA1+ cell load or numbers at 1 or 2 weeks after the final tamoxifen injection.
“Spi1 deletion did not affect IBA1+ cell load or numbers at 1 or 2 weeks following the final tamoxifen injection (Figures S1F and S1G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SPI1 protein level was 29.8% lower in Spi1ΔMG mice than in Spi1wt mice.
“SPI1 protein levels were found to be 29.8% lower in Spi1ΔMG mice compared to Spi1wt mice, as determined by western blot analysis (Figures 1C and 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spi1 mRNA level was 33.7% lower in Spi1ΔMG mice than in Spi1wt mice.
“The qPCR results revealed that the Spi1 mRNA level was 33.7% lower in the Spi1ΔMG mice than in the Spi1wt mice (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Directly activating Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1 rescues the impaired Aβ uptake caused by Spi1 knockdown.
“directly activating these genes rescues the impaired Aβ uptake caused by Spi1 knockdown”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion increased insoluble Aβ42 in the cortex by 1.31-fold compared with controls.
“Knockdown of Spi1 in microglia significantly increased the levels of insoluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 in the cortex by 1.48- and 1.31-fold, respectively, compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures 2B and 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of fibrillar plaques per area was significantly increased in cortex and hippocampus of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“the number of fibrillar plaques normalized by the area was also significantly increased in the cortical and hippocampal regions of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice than in those of control mice (Figures 3I and 3J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Gal-3+ area within IBA1+ area was increased by 1.80-fold in the cortex of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“the area occupied by Gal-3+ cells within IBA1+ cell area was significantly increased by 1.80-fold in the cortical region of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In APPPS1-21 mice, deleting Spi1 in microglia significantly increases the number of neuritic plaques.
“These results demonstrate that microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increases the extent of dystrophic neurites and the number of neuritic plaques, indicating an exacerbation of plaque-associated neuronal damage by Spi1-knockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion increased insoluble Aβ in both male and female mice to a similar extent.
“Our analysis revealed that microglial Spi1 deletion increased insoluble Aβ levels in the cortices and hippocampi of both male and female mice to a similar extent (Figures S2A–S2D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In proteome analysis, the Immune response_Phagocytosis network was the most significantly altered network between Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 and Spi1wt;APPPS1-21 mice.
“The “Protein folding and maturation_Amyloid precursor protein processing” pathway (Figure 7B and Table S2) and the “Immune response_Phagocytosis” network (Figure 7C and Table S3) were identified as the most significantly altered pathway and network, respectively, between Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice and Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cell viability did not differ significantly between vehicle and 4-OHT groups after Aβ treatment.
“No significant difference in cell viability was observed between the vehicle and 4-OHT groups (Figure S5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spi1 deletion in microglia does not affect APP processing.
“These data suggest that Spi1 deletion in microglia does not affect APP processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The area of plaque covered by IBA1+ microglial clusters was reduced by 22.7% in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“The area of plaque covered by the IBA1+ microglial cluster was significantly reduced by 22.7% in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figure 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion significantly upregulates APOE protein levels in APPPS1-21 mice.
“Conversely, we observed a significant upregulation of APOE, a marker of disease-associated microglia32,33.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Although our primary focus was on the downregulated PU.1 target genes, we also found a significant increase in APOE protein levels in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figure 7A and Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Findingown data
Il1b and iNos expression levels were significantly increased in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“Our results showed that Il1b and iNos expression levels were significantly increased in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures S3A and S3B), while Tnf showed an increasing trend but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0534, Figure S3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion does not affect APP processing.
“As microglial Spi1 deletion did not affect APP processing (Figure S2J–2L), we next explored alternative mechanisms contributing to our observed amyloid pathology phenotype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion reduced the number of processes per microglial cell.
“Skeleton analysis of microglial morphology revealed fewer processes per microglial cell in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures 4E and 4F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion decreased the median fluorescence intensity of CD11b+MeX04+ microglia that had ingested Aβ.
“microglial Spi1 deletion significantly decreased the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD11b+MeX04+ microglia that had ingested Aβ (Figures 5D and 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Deep proteome profiling of cortices from Spi1wt;APPPS1-21 and Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice quantified 9,592 unique peptides (9,084 genes) and 199 DEPs at p<0.01.
“We quantified 9,592 unique peptides (9,084 genes) and 199 DEPs (p<0.01, indicated as a horizontal dashed line in Figure 7A) in response to microglial Spi1 deletion (Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Gfap mRNA expression was significantly increased in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“Furthermore, Gfap mRNA expression was significantly increased in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice (Figure S3D), consistent with GFAP histological analysis (Figures 4G–4I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spi1 knockdown reduced fAβ uptake by 54.3%, 67.3%, and 75.7% at 4, 8, and 24 hours after fAβ-pHrodo treatment compared with vehicle.
“Compared to the vehicle group, the Spi1 knockdown (4-OHT) group showed a significant decrease in fAβ uptake, 54.3%, 67.3%, and 75.7% reduction at 4, 8, and 24 hours, respectively, after fAβ-pHrodo treatment (Figure 5G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In APPPS1-21 mice, deleting Spi1 in microglia significantly increases the extent of dystrophic neurites.
“These results demonstrate that microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increases the extent of dystrophic neurites and the number of neuritic plaques, indicating an exacerbation of plaque-associated neuronal damage by Spi1-knockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Immune response_Phagocytosis network, 9 of 11 network objects were DEPs in the proteomics dataset.
“Among the “Immune response_Phagocytosis” network components, we identified 9 DEPs among 11 Network objects in our proteomics dataset (Figure 7D and Table S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spi1 knockout in microglia significantly increases Aβ accumulation and amyloid plaque deposition.
“The pathway term “Protein folding and maturation_Amyloid precursor protein processing”, which includes Aβ40, Aβ42 as the component, further supports our observation that Spi1 knockout in microglia significantly increases Aβ accumulation and amyloid plaque deposition (Figures 2 and 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion increased insoluble Aβ42 in the hippocampus by 1.67-fold compared with controls.
“The levels of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in the hippocampus were significantly increased by 2.11- and 1.67-fold, respectively, in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures 2D and 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the PBS-soluble fraction, Aβ42 was increased by 1.47-fold in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice compared with controls.
“In the PBS soluble fraction, Aβ40 levels were increased by 1.58-fold (Figure 2F), and Aβ42 levels were increased by 1.47-fold (Figure 2G) in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cell viability did not differ between Spi1 knockdown and vehicle groups after zymosan particle treatment.
“Similar to the result of the Aβ uptake assay, there was no difference in cell viability between the Spi1 knockdown and vehicle groups after zymosan particle treatment (Figure S5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the RIPA-soluble fraction, Aβ42 was increased by 1.37-fold in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 cortices compared with controls.
“In the RIPA soluble fraction, Aβ40 levels were increased by 1.38-fold (Figure 2H), and Aβ42 levels were increased by 1.37-fold (Figure 2I) in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 cortices relative to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 cortices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In proteome analysis, the Protein folding and maturation_Amyloid precursor protein processing pathway was the most significantly altered pathway between Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 and Spi1wt;APPPS1-21 mice.
“The “Protein folding and maturation_Amyloid precursor protein processing” pathway (Figure 7B and Table S2) and the “Immune response_Phagocytosis” network (Figure 7C and Table S3) were identified as the most significantly altered pathway and network, respectively, between Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice and Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of Aβ plaques per area was significantly increased in cortex and hippocampus of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“the number of Aβ plaques normalized by the area was also significantly increased in the cortex and hippocampus of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures 3D and 3E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spi1 mRNA levels were decreased by 79.7% in 4-OHT-treated primary microglia from Spi1ΔMG mice compared with vehicle-treated cells.
“Spi1 mRNA levels were decreased by 79.7% in 4-OHT-treated primary microglia compared to vehicle-treated primary microglia from Spi1ΔMG mice (Figure S5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increases amyloid plaque deposition in APPPS1-21 mouse brains.
“Taken together, these data demonstrate that microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increases amyloid plaque deposition in the brains of APPPS1–21 mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the PBS-soluble fraction, Aβ40 was increased by 1.58-fold in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice compared with controls.
“In the PBS soluble fraction, Aβ40 levels were increased by 1.58-fold (Figure 2F), and Aβ42 levels were increased by 1.47-fold (Figure 2G) in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spi1 knockdown decreased zymosan particle uptake by 33.1% compared with vehicle at 3 hours after zymosan-pHrodo treatment.
“The Spi1 knockdown (4-OHT) significantly decreased zymosan particle uptake by 33.1% compared to the vehicle group, as measured 3 hours after zymosan-pHrodo particle treatment (Figure S5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In primary microglia from Spi1wt mice, Spi1 mRNA levels did not change between vehicle- and 4-OHT-treated groups.
“As expected, with primary microglia from Spi1wt mice, there was no change in Spi1 mRNA levels between the vehicle- and 4-OHT-treated groups (Figure S5B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the RIPA-soluble fraction, Aβ40 was increased by 1.38-fold in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 cortices compared with controls.
“In the RIPA soluble fraction, Aβ40 levels were increased by 1.38-fold (Figure 2H), and Aβ42 levels were increased by 1.37-fold (Figure 2I) in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 cortices relative to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 cortices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion increased insoluble Aβ40 in the cortex by 1.48-fold compared with controls.
“Knockdown of Spi1 in microglia significantly increased the levels of insoluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 in the cortex by 1.48- and 1.31-fold, respectively, compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures 2B and 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion increased insoluble Aβ40 in the hippocampus by 2.11-fold compared with controls.
“The levels of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in the hippocampus were significantly increased by 2.11- and 1.67-fold, respectively, in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures 2D and 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Tnf expression showed an increasing trend but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0534) in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“while Tnf showed an increasing trend but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0534, Figure S3C)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The proportion of CD11b+MeX04+ microglia showed a decreasing trend in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“We also observed a decreasing trend in the proportion of CD11b+MeX04+ microglia in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figure S4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion downregulates the homeostatic proteins TMEM119, ENDPD1, P2RY12, and CRYBB1.
“Among these DEPs, we observed the downregulation of microglial homeostatic proteins, such as TMEM119, ENDPD1, P2RY12, and CRYBB1, upon deletion of microglial Spi1 (Figure 7A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
APP, BACE1, and β-CTF protein levels did not differ significantly in the cortex of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice compared with controls.
“No significant differences were observed in the protein levels of APP, BACE1, and β-CTF in the cortex of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures S2J–S2L, respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion increases Aβ levels across multiple brain fractions.
“Collectively, our data demonstrated that the deletion of microglial Spi1 leads to an increase in Aβ levels in multiple brain fractions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increases expression of MFGE8, ALOX5, and GFAP in APPPS1-21 mice.
“We also observed significant increases in the expression of MFGE8, ALOX5, and GFAP in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice (Figure 7A).”
- Also stated in: § Proteome analysis suggests that microglial Spi1 deletion exacerbates amyloid pathology by impairing phagocytic function · plain
“In addition, the astrocyte marker GFAP was significantly upregulated in Spi1 deletion mice (Figure 7A), which was consistent with GFAP histological analysis (Figure 4G–I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Proteome analysis suggests that microglial Spi1 deletion exacerbates amyloid pathology by impairing phagocytic function · plain
- Findingown data
In primary microglia, Spi1 knockdown significantly lowers fAβ uptake 8 hours after treatment compared to vehicle.
“Analysis of fAβ-pHrodo uptake in primary microglia revealed that, compared to the vehicle group, fAβ uptake was significantly lower in the Spi1-knockdown (4-OHT) group 8 hours after treatment (Figure 7I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
4-OHT treatment of primary microglia isolated from Spi1wt mice did not alter Spi1 expression.
“Additionally, we confirmed that 4-OHT treatment of primary microglia isolated from Spi1wt mice did not alter the expression of Spi1 (Figure S5B).50”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No difference in Spi1 expression in spleen or PBMCs was found between Spi1wt and Spi1ΔMG mice.
“We found no difference in Spi1 expression between Spi1wt and Spi1ΔMG mice in either tissue (Table S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Spi1 is highly expressed in spleen and peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
- Findingown data
High-confidence functional and physical interactions exist between Spi1 and Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1 via STRING clustering analysis.
“Moreover, we observed high-confidence functional and physical interactions between Spi1 and Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1 via STRING clustering analysis (Figure S7D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In BV-2 microglia, overexpression of Syk, Lyn, or Fcgr1 significantly restores Aβ uptake impaired by Spi1 knockdown.
“Among the candidate genes, the overexpression of Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1 significantly restored the Aβ uptake impaired by Spi1 knockdown in BV-2 microglia (Figure 7G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
APOE is a component of the DEPs in the Immune response_Phagocytosis network.
“Notably, APOE is also a component of the DEPs in the “Immune response_Phagocytosis” network (Figure 7D and Table S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Five candidate Spi1 targets regulated by Spi1 knockdown in microglia were identified.
“To gain deeper insights into SPI1’s mechanism of action, we screened for candidate Spi1 targets that are regulated by Spi1 knockdown in microglia and identified five candidates (Figure 7F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In BV-2 microglia, Spi1 knockdown does not change expression of Rgs10 and Fcgr3.
“Among these genes, the expression levels of Syk, Lyn, Stat1, Entpd1, and Fcgr1 were significantly decreased by the knockdown of Spi1, while the expression levels of Rgs10 and Fcgr3 were not changed (Figure 7F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In BV-2 microglia, Spi1 knockdown significantly decreases expression of Syk, Lyn, Stat1, Entpd1, and Fcgr1.
“Among these genes, the expression levels of Syk, Lyn, Stat1, Entpd1, and Fcgr1 were significantly decreased by the knockdown of Spi1, while the expression levels of Rgs10 and Fcgr3 were not changed (Figure 7F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In primary microglia, Spi1 knockdown significantly reduces expression of Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1.
“Consistent with our findings in BV-2 cells (Figure 7F), the knockdown of Spi1 significantly reduced the expression of Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1 in primary microglia (Figure 7H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In BV-2 microglia, Spi1 knockdown significantly decreases fAβ uptake 24 hours after fAβ-pHrodo treatment compared to siRNA-negative control.
“Consistent with the findings of the primary microglial fAβ-pHrodo Aβ uptake assay (Figures 5G and 5H), the uptake of fAβ was significantly decreased 24 hours after fAβ-pHrodo treatment in the Spi1-knockdown group compared to the siRNA-negative control (siR-NC) group (Figure 7G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Protein levels of the seven selected Spi1 target genes were significantly lower in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice than in Spi1wt;APPPS1-21 mice.
“We first examined the levels of the proteins expressed from these genes in our proteomics dataset and found that their levels were significantly lower in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figure S7A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Deleting Spi1 in microglia did not produce sex-dependent differences in insoluble Aβ42 amounts in the cortex or hippocampus.
“Microglial Spi1 deletion had no sex-specific effects on insoluble Aβ42 levels in the cortex or hippocampus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Loss of microglial Spi1 impairs phagocytosis via Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1.
“we revealed that the loss of microglial Spi1 impairs phagocytosis through Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Whole-body Spi1 knockdown and overexpression models have limitations for separating cell-specific effects of SPI1 modulation.
“The use of whole-body knockdown and overexpression models, although informative, presents limitations in delineating the cell-specific effects of SPI1 modulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The observed reduction in Spi1 expression confirms that the conditional knockout strategy reduced Spi1 levels in microglia.
“This reduction in Spi1 expression confirms the effectiveness of our conditional knockout strategy in reducing Spi1 levels in microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Selective removal of Spi1 from microglia worsens Alzheimer's disease-related pathology in an amyloid mouse model.
“Here, we demonstrate that the selective deletion of Spi1 in microglia exacerbates AD-related pathologies in an amyloid mouse model.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · boosted
“we demonstrated that microglial Spi1 deletion exacerbates the neuropathological features of AD in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · boosted
- Interpretationown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion regulates multiple AD-associated genes that may collectively contribute to AD pathogenesis.
“These results demonstrated that microglial Spi1 deletion can regulate multiple AD-associated genes that may collectively contribute to the pathogenesis of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Spi1 knockdown exacerbates plaque-associated neuronal damage.
“These results demonstrate that microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increases the extent of dystrophic neurites and the number of neuritic plaques, indicating an exacerbation of plaque-associated neuronal damage by Spi1-knockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The findings suggest that deletion of SPI1 in microglia may impair fibrillar Aβ phagocytosis.
“These findings suggest that deletion of SPI1 in microglia may impair fAβ phagocytosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SPI1 coordinates expression of Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1, which collectively regulate microglial phagocytic capacity.
“Our proteomic analysis and functional validation studies demonstrate that SPI1 coordinates the expression of key downstream effectors including Syk, Lyn and Fcgr1, which collectively regulates microglial phagocytic capacity (Figures 7G and 7I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The SPI1-APOE regulatory axis may be a central mechanism controlling microglial responses in AD pathology.
“Taken together, these and our results suggest the potential importance of investigating the SPI1–APOE regulatory axis, as a central mechanism controlling microglial responses in AD pathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The exacerbations are likely due to impaired microglial phagocytosis of Aβ.
“Our mechanistic studies suggest that these exacerbations are likely due to the impaired microglial phagocytosis of Aβ (Figure 5), highlighting the crucial role of Spi1 in maintaining microglial function in the context of AD pathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Microglial Spi1 deletion affects AD pathology by interfering with phagocytic function.
“This integrated systems biology approach demonstrates that microglial Spi1 deletion affects AD pathology by interfering with phagocytic function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Activation of certain Spi1 target genes restores microglial phagocytic function impaired by Spi1 knockdown.
“Collectively, these data demonstrate that activation of certain Spi1 target genes restores microglial phagocytic function impaired by Spi1 knockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Spi1 deletion in microglia impairs phagocytosis through downregulation of its target genes Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1.
“Importantly, Spi1 deletion in microglia impaired phagocytosis, through the downregulation of its target genes, Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1 (Figures 7G and 7I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
APOE4 exerts pathogenic effects through toxic gain-of-function mechanisms rather than loss of normal physiological activity.
“These findings directly support the hypothesis that APOE4 exerts its pathogenic effects through toxic gain-of-function mechanisms, rather than the loss of normal physiological activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Tamoxifen-administered Spi1ΔMG mice show no off-target Spi1 deletion effects in spleen or short-lived PBMCs.
“These results demonstrated that tamoxifen-administered Spi1ΔM mice showed no off-target effects in the spleen or in short-lived PBMCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Starting Spi1 deletion at 1 month of age did not affect microglial density during early development.
“By starting the deletion of the Spi1 gene at 1 month of age, our study design enabled us to perform this study without affecting the density of the microglial population during early development (Figures 1A and 1E–1I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The discrepancy between studies may be attributed to differences in the Spi1/PU.1 floxed mouse strains used.
“This discrepancy may be attributed to differences in the Spi1/PU.1 floxed mouse strains used between studies (Strain #T01098045 from GemPharmatech in Wu et al. 2025; Strain #00692246 from Jackson Laboratory in the present study).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
SPI1 is a master regulatory hub controlling multiple downstream pathways simultaneously.
“From a systems biology perspective, this pronounced phenotypic response to modest SPI1 reduction reflects the transcription factor’s position as a master regulatory hub controlling multiple downstream pathways simultaneously.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
SPI1 levels in peripheral immune cells might not accurately reflect its expression in brain-resident microglia.
“This finding suggests that SPI1 levels in peripheral immune cells might not accurately reflect its expression in brain-resident microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Microglial SPI1 deletion significantly reduces phagocytic activity against Aβ.
“Taken together, our findings demonstrate that microglial SPI1 deletion significantly reduces their phagocytic activity against Aβ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
- May combine two claims. 45
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicroglia play crucial roles in maintaining homeostasis and immune defense in the central nervous system.
“Microglia, professional phagocytes, play crucial roles in maintaining homeostasis and providing immune defense in the central nervous system (CNS)6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Norris, 2019, Immune cells and CNS physiology: Microglia and beyond, J. Exp. Med. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSample size was based on power calculations from prior APPPS1-21 data, targeting at least 11 mice per genotype.
“The sample size for our study was determined based on statistical power calculations derived from our prior data using the APPPS1–21 mouse model11. Using a power of 0.8, α = 0.05, an effect size of 40% for insoluble Aβ42 levels, and a standard deviation determined from previous studies, we aimed to generate at least 11 mice per genotype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Kim, 2024, Effects of SPI1-mediated transcriptome remodeling on Alzheimer’s disease-related phenotypes in mouse models of Aβ amyloidosis, Nat. Commun. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe APPPS1-21 model begins Aβ accumulation in the neocortex at about 6 to 8 weeks and shows robust Aβ accumulation and plaque deposition at 4 months.
“The APPPS1–21 mouse model used in our study starts to accumulate Aβ in the neocortex at approximately 6 to 8 weeks of age and exhibits robust Aβ accumulation and plaque deposition at 4 months of age13.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Radde, 2006, Abeta42-driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology, EMBO Rep. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGalectin-3 is a key neuroinflammation protein and is strongly upregulated in neurodegenerative conditions.
“Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a key protein involved in neuroinflammation and is strongly upregulated in neurodegenerative conditions16.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Heneka, 2015, Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease, Lancet Neurol. source
The Microglia and Summary and outlook sections discuss neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disease, but do not identify galectin-3 as a key protein or report that it is strongly upregulated. Searches for galectin-3, Gal-3, galectin, and LGALS3 found no passage addressing those claims; no page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationZymosan particles are commonly used to assess general phagocytosis.
“zymosan particles, which are commonly used to assess general phagocytosis25,26”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDystrophic neurites are abnormal neurites around amyloid plaques with swollen, bulbous formations and degenerating axons and dendrites.
“These are abnormal neurites surrounding amyloid plaques characterized by swollen, bulbous formations and the presence of degenerating axons and dendrites27.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Tate, 2024, Deletion of miR-33, a regulator of the ABCA1–APOE pathway, ameliorates neuropathological phenotypes in APP/PS1 mice, Alzheimers Dement. source
The Results section describes amyloid plaque deposition in APP/PS1 mice, but does not describe dystrophic neurites. Searches for neurites, swollen or bulbous formations, and degenerating axons or dendrites found no passage defining them or linking them to plaques; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAbnormal activation of microglia and astrocytes occurs in Alzheimer's disease patients and APPPS1-21 transgenic model mice.
“Abnormal activation of microglia and astrocytes is observed in the brains of AD patients15 and APPPS1–21 transgenic model mice13.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Cole, 2007, The Alzheimer's disease β-secretase enzyme, BACE1, Mol. Neurodegener. source
The BACE1 expression section (page unavailable) describes astrocyte activation as a feature observed in AD and refers to reactive astrocytes in human AD brain. It does not establish abnormal microglial activation in AD patients. The APPPS1–21 mouse claim has a separate citation and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [13] Radde, 2006, Abeta42-driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology, EMBO Rep. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA previous report found no sex-dependent differences in Aβ accumulation in the APPPS1-21 mouse model.
“although a previous report demonstrated no sex-dependent differences in Aβ accumulation in this APPPS1–21 mouse model13”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Radde, 2006, Abeta42-driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology, EMBO Rep. source
The Cerebral amyloidosis section reports that male and female APPPS1-21 mice did not differ statistically in Aβ levels or amyloid load at 1–2 months of age. The sex comparison was limited to those early ages, so it does not establish an absence of sex-dependent differences in Aβ accumulation generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Alzheimer's disease patients and Aβ amyloidosis model mice, Gal-3 is elevated in microglia around Aβ plaques and induces neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration.
“In both AD patients and Aβ amyloidosis model mice, Gal-3 is significantly elevated in microglia clustered around Aβ plaques, where it induces neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration17,18.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] García-Revilla, 2022, Galectin-3, a rising star in modulating microglia activation under conditions of neurodegeneration, Cell Death Dis. source
The Alzheimer’s disease section (page unavailable) reports that Gal-3 is highly upregulated in AD patients and 5xFAD mice, is associated with Aβ plaques, and that deleting it in mice attenuates microglial immune responses and reduces pathology. But the Microglia diversity and Gal-3 section (page unavailable) calls the idea that Gal-3 makes microglia neurotoxic speculative; the copy does not establish that plaque-associated Gal-3 induces neurodegeneration in patients and mice as the sentence states. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [18] Boza-Serrano, 2022, Galectin-3 is elevated in CSF and is associated with Aβ deposits and tau aggregates in brain tissue in Alzheimer’s disease, Acta Neuropathol. source
The Introduction reports elevated Gal-3 in plaque-associated microglia in AD patients, and the Abstract describes its expression around plaques in both human and mouse brain. The Discussion links Gal-3 to a detrimental inflammatory response, but its human findings associate Gal-3 with markers of neuronal degeneration; they do not establish that Gal-3 induces neurodegeneration in patients or model mice. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMicroglial Fcgr1 is involved in Aβ clearance via Fc-receptor-Syk-mediated phagocytosis.
“Like Syk, microglial Fcgr1 is involved Aβ clearance via Fc-receptor-Syk-mediated phagocytosis53.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Islam, 2022, Gender differences in Alzheimer's may be associated with TLR4-LYN expression in damage associated microglia and neuronal phagocytosis, J. Cell. Physiol. source
The Discussion addresses Aβ clearance and TLR4–LYN signaling, while the ‘Microglial phagocytosis of neurons in AD mice’ section examines neuronal material, not Aβ clearance. Neither passage identifies Fcgr1 or an Fc-receptor–Syk phagocytosis pathway; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicroglia facilitate Aβ clearance through phagocytosis and can also exacerbate neurodegeneration by driving persistent neuroinflammation.
“For example, they facilitate the clearance of Aβ through phagocytosis42, yet they can also exacerbate neurodegeneration by driving persistent neuroinflammation43.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpi1 overexpression enhances microglial phagocytosis, whereas Spi1 knockdown reduces this function in the same cell line.
“Conversely, Spi1 overexpression enhances microglial phagocytosis, whereas its knockdown reduced this function in the same cell line7,25.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPartial reduction of human APOE level substantially reduced amyloid deposition and neuroinflammation, independent of APOE isoform, implicating overall APOE protein abundance as a key driver of AD pathogenesis.
“Partial reduction of human APOE level substantially reduced amyloid deposition and neuroinflammation, independent of APOE isoform, implicating overall APOE protein abundance itself as a key driver of AD pathogenesis56,57.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] Bien-Ly, 2012, Reducing Human Apolipoprotein E Levels Attenuates Age-Dependent Aβ Accumulation in Mutant Human Amyloid Precursor Protein Transgenic Mice, J. Neurosci. source
The Results section, “Halving the levels of apoE significantly attenuates Aβ deposition in aged mice,” reports fewer fibrillar plaques with one rather than two copies of either human APOE3 or APOE4. The Discussion also says the reduction in Aβ accumulation occurred regardless of isoform, while noting that the effects differed by isoform and age. Our copy does not report that reducing APOE lowered neuroinflammation or establish protein abundance as a driver of AD pathogenesis beyond the measured amyloid outcomes in mice. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [57] Chemparathy, 2024, APOE loss-of-function variants: Compatible with longevity and associated with resistance to Alzheimer’s disease pathology, Neuron source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA human genetic study reported that lower SPI1 expression is associated with delayed onset of AD.
“Interestingly, our findings appear to contradict a human genetic study that reported the association of lower SPI1 expression with the delayed onset of AD7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Huang, 2017, A common haplotype lowers PU.1 expression in myeloid cells and delays onset of Alzheimer's disease, Nat. Neurosci. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a 1-year-old male amyloid mouse model, the compound alleviated neuropathological phenotypes including neuroinflammation.
“When tested in a 1-year-old male amyloid mouse models, this compound alleviated neuropathological phenotypes, including neuroinflammation51, opening exciting possibilities for future treatment strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Ennerfelt, 2022, SYK coordinates neuroprotective microglial responses in neurodegenerative disease, Cell source
The Results section, “Exogenous activation of the CLEC7A-SYK signaling pathway promotes improved clearance of Aβ” (page unavailable), reports that pustulan reduced hippocampal Aβ load in 5xFAD mice compared with vehicle. The cited passages do not establish that the treated mice were 1-year-old males or that the compound alleviated neuroinflammation; the reported treatment outcome is Aβ clearance. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent study by Wu et al. (2025) reported that microglial PU.1 is essential for microglial maintenance in adult mice, with reduced microglial numbers 1 week after tamoxifen in Spi1Fl/Fl;Cx3cr1CreER mice compared to Spi1Fl/+;Cx3cr1CreER mice.
“Nevertheless, a recent study by Wu et al. (2025) reported that microglial PU.1 is essential for microglial maintenance in adult mice44, demonstrating a reduction in microglial numbers 1 week after tamoxifen injection in Spi1Fl/Fl;Cx3cr1CreER mice compared to Spi1Fl/+;Cx3cr1CreER mice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Wu, 2025, Pu.1/Spi1 dosage controls the turnover and maintenance of microglia in zebrafish and mammals, eLife source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLowering APOE levels may confer protection against AD.
“Previous studies suggest that lowering APOE levels may confer protection against AD56–59.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [56] Bien-Ly, 2012, Reducing Human Apolipoprotein E Levels Attenuates Age-Dependent Aβ Accumulation in Mutant Human Amyloid Precursor Protein Transgenic Mice, J. Neurosci. source
- cites [57] Chemparathy, 2024, APOE loss-of-function variants: Compatible with longevity and associated with resistance to Alzheimer’s disease pathology, Neuron source
- cites [58] Tate, 2024, APOE loss of function: A genetic shield against Alzheimer’s disease, Neuron source
- cites [59] Lopes, 2022, Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies, Nat. Genet. source
The Results section links altered microglial gene expression to Alzheimer’s disease risk, but its specific example concerns USP6NL, not APOE. Searches for APOE and for lowered APOE expression found no passage in our copy saying that lowering APOE levels may protect against Alzheimer’s disease. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCx3cr1CreER mice can exhibit Cre recombination even without tamoxifen injection, which could confound experimental results.
“However, it has been reported that Cx3cr1CreER mice can exhibit Cre recombination even without tamoxifen injection, which could confound experimental results48,49.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicroglial Syk is essential for Aβ clearance, and its deficiency exacerbates Aβ pathology in a mouse model.
“Intriguingly, recent studies revealed that microglial Syk is essential for Aβ clearance, with its deficiency exacerbating Aβ pathology in a mouse model24,52.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [24] Condello, 2015, Microglia constitute a barrier that prevents neurotoxic protofibrillar Aβ42 hotspots around plaques, Nat. Commun. source
The Introduction discusses a possible role for microglia in Aβ clearance, and the Results examine CX3CR1 manipulation and plaque neurotoxicity. Searches for Syk and Syk deficiency found no passage in our copy addressing whether microglial Syk is essential for clearance or whether its deficiency exacerbates Aβ pathology. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [52] Illouz, 2021, Maternal antibodies facilitate Amyloid-β clearance by activating Fc-receptor-Syk-mediated phagocytosis, Commun. Biol. source
The Results section ('MAbs facilitate Aβ clearance by microglial cells in a Syk-dependent manner'; page unavailable) reports that Syk inhibition reduced Aβ phagocytosis in cultured microglia, supporting a role for Syk in clearance. It does not show that microglial Syk deficiency exacerbated Aβ pathology in a mouse model; the mouse findings concern maternal vaccination and Syk activation, not Syk deficiency. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe level of APOE plays critical roles in AD-associated phenotypes beyond APOE isoform status.
“Beyond APOE isoform status, the level of APOE also plays critical roles in AD-associated phenotypes55.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Kim, 2011, Haploinsufficiency of human APOE reduces amyloid deposition in a mouse model of amyloid-beta amyloidosis, J. Neurosci. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA compound that recruits transcriptional co-repressor complexes to SPI1 binding motifs indirectly inhibits PU.1 function without directly binding PU.1.
“Although this compound did not directly bind to the PU.1 protein, it indirectly inhibited PU.1 function through these co-repressor complexes51.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Ennerfelt, 2022, SYK coordinates neuroprotective microglial responses in neurodegenerative disease, Cell source
The Results section on Aβ-induced microglial activation discusses how SYK deletion alters microglial gene expression, not a compound acting on PU.1. Searches for PU.1, SPI1, co-repressor complexes, and indirect inhibition found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeven genes (Syk, Lyn, Stat1, Entpd1, Rgs10, Fcgr1, and Fcgr3) are directly targeted by Spi1 and may be involved in phagocytosis.
“Based on the “Immune response_Phagocytosis” components and the Spi1 chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq) data38,39, we selected seven genes (Syk, Lyn, Stat1, Entpd1, Rgs10, Fcgr1, and Fcgr3) that are directly targeted by Spi1 and may be involved in phagocytosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Crotti, 2014, Mutant Huntingtin promotes autonomous microglia activation via myeloid lineage-determining factors, Nat. Neurosci. source
The Results section on mHTT-promoted PU.1–C/EBP gene expression reports PU.1 ChIP-seq data in microglia, supporting the citation as a source of Spi1/PU.1 binding data (page unavailable). Our copy does not identify the seven named genes as direct targets or link them to phagocytosis; searches for the gene list, Fcgr3, and phagocytosis did not locate that evidence. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [39] Satoh, 2014, A Comprehensive Profile of ChIP-Seq-Based PU.1/Spi1 Target Genes in Microglia, Gene Regul. Syst. Biol. source
The Results section on target-gene identification names Syk as a ChIP-Seq-based Spi1 target, and the molecular-networks Results section links the broader target set to phagocytosis pathways (page numbers unavailable). Our copy does not identify Lyn, Stat1, Entpd1, Rgs10, Fcgr1, or Fcgr3 as Spi1 targets or link each of the seven genes to phagocytosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationImpaired Aβ clearance by microglia may be associated with Lyn.
“In addition, a recent study suggested that impaired Aβ clearance by microglia may be associated with Lyn54.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Kang, 2018, Microglial translational profiling reveals a convergent APOE pathway from aging, amyloid, and tau, J. Exp. Med. source
The Results and discussion passage links aging, amyloidosis, and tauopathy to a microglial APOE response and possible dysfunction, but does not link Lyn to impaired Aβ clearance. Searches of our full-text copy for Lyn and Aβ clearance found no passage addressing that association. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe rs1057233 SNP in SPI1 is a protective allele (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.91-0.97) associated with lower SPI1 mRNA levels in peripheral immune cells.
“This study identified a specific variant within the SPI1 gene (rs1057233 SNP) as a protective allele (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91–0.97) and found it is associated with lower SPI1 mRNA levels in peripheral immune cells (monocytes and macrophages)7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Huang, 2017, A common haplotype lowers PU.1 expression in myeloid cells and delays onset of Alzheimer's disease, Nat. Neurosci. source
The Results section (Cis-eQTL associations and colocalization analysis; page unavailable) identifies the protective rs1057233G allele and reports its association with lower SPI1 expression in monocytes and macrophages. The passages retrieved for the stated odds ratio and confidence interval do not establish OR = 0.93 or 95% CI = 0.91–0.97, so those figures are not verified by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMicroglial SPI1 deficiency did not change microglial number but reduced microglial processes.
“Taken together, these findings indicate that although the deficiency of microglial SPI1 did not alter the number of microglia, it led to a reduction in microglial processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGFAP+ cell area and GFAP+ cell number per area were increased by 2.39-fold and 1.57-fold in the cortex of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“the GFAP+ cell area and the number of GFAP+ cells normalized by the area were significantly increased by 2.39-fold (Figure 4G) and 1.57-fold (Figure 4H), respectively, in the cortical area of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSPI1 is functionally or physically associated with Syk and Lyn in the Immune response_Phagocytosis network.
“This analysis further supported that SPI1 is functionally or physically associated with Syk and Lyn in the “Immune response_Phagocytosis” network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMicroglial Spi1 deletion increases the extent of dystrophic neurites and the number of neuritic plaques.
“These results demonstrate that microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increases the extent of dystrophic neurites and the number of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataInsoluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels were significantly correlated in cortical and hippocampal tissues and in PBS and RIPA fractions of cortical tissue.
“there was a significant correlation between insoluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in both in cortical and hippocampal tissues (Figures S2E and S2F, respectively), as well as in the PBS and RIPA fractions of cortical tissue (Figures S2G and S2E, respectively) from these mice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe number of neuritic plaques (LAMP1+82E1+) was increased by 1.45-fold in cortex and 2.05-fold in hippocampus in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“The number of neuritic plaques (LAMP1+82E1+) was also significantly increased by 1.45- and 2.05-fold in the cortical and hippocampal areas, respectively, in the Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures 6D and 6E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMicroglial Spi1 deletion increased fibrillar plaque load by 1.69-fold in cortex and 2.08-fold in hippocampus.
“We observed a significant increase in the fibrillar plaque load by 1.69- and 2.08-fold in the cortical and hippocampal areas, respectively, in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures 3G and 3H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMicroglial Spi1 deletion increased Aβ plaque load by 1.52-fold in cortex and 1.65-fold in hippocampus.
“microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increased the Aβ plaque load by 1.52- and 1.65-fold in the cortical and hippocampal areas, respectively (Figures 3B and 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIBA1+ cell area and IBA1+ cell number per area were increased by 1.51-fold and 1.36-fold in the cortex of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice.
“The area covered by IBA1+ cell and the number of IBA1+ cells per area were significantly increased by 1.51-fold and 1.36-fold, respectively, in the cortical area of Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures 4B and 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMicroglial Spi1 deletion increased LAMP1+ cluster load by 1.72-fold in cortex and 2.06-fold in hippocampus.
“Microglial Spi1 deletion dramatically increased the LAMP1+ cluster load by 1.72- and 2.06-fold in the cortical and hippocampal areas, respectively, compared to that in Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figures 6B and 6C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataNo significant differences in microglial numbers or density were observed between Spi1wt and Spi1ΔMG mice at 1 and 2 weeks after final tamoxifen injection.
“No significant differences were observed between genotypes, consistent with our finding at 4 weeks post-injection (Figures 1E–1I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn APPPS1-21 mice, microglial Spi1 deletion significantly increases microgliosis, astrogliosis, and neuroinflammatory marker gene expression.
“In APPPS1–21 mice, microglial Spi1 deletion led to a significant increase in microgliosis and astrogliosis (Figure 4) as well as elevated expression of neuroinflammatory maker genes (Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn primary microglia, overexpression of Syk and Fcgr1 significantly restores Aβ uptake impaired by Spi1 knockdown without affecting cell viability.
“Importantly, consistent with our findings in BV-2 cells, the overexpression of Syk and Fcgr1 significantly restored the Aβ uptake impaired by Spi1 knockdown in primary microglia (Figure 7I), without affecting cell viability (Figure S7C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSpi1 deletion in microglia worsens Aβ accumulation by disrupting SPI target genes including Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1, but not Stat1 and Entpd1.
“Our findings suggest that Spi1 deletion in microglia exacerbates Aβ accumulation by disrupting the regulatory functions of SPI target genes, including Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1, but not Stat1 and Entpd1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe findings suggest a general decrease in microglial surveillance activity or an alteration in microglial function.
“These findings suggest a general decrease in microglial surveillance activity or a potential alteration in microglial function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis impairment may increase activation of microglia and astrocytes, triggering neuroinflammation in an Aβ amyloidosis mouse model.
“This impairment consequently may lead to increased activation of both microglia and astrocytes, triggering neuroinflammation in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSeparate analyses using up- or down-regulated DEPs supported the pathway and network findings.
“These findings were also supported by separate analyses with up- or down-regulated DEPs (Figure S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPU.1 is essential for microglial development at the embryonic precursor stage, and early Spi1 deletion interferes with microglial maturation.
“Since the transcription factor PU.1 is essential for the development of microglia at the embryonic microglial precursor stage, deletion of the Spi1 gene at this early stage interferes with the maturation of microglia8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Kierdorf, 2013, Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways, Nat. Neurosci. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSpi1 deletion in microglia reduces microglial processes in an Aβ amyloid mouse model, impairing microglial detection of and response to brain microenvironment changes or damage.
“Taken together, our results indicate that deletion of Spi1 in microglia reduces microglial processes in an Aβ amyloid mouse model, impairing the ability of microglia to detect and respond to changes or damage in the brain microenvironment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCD11b+MeX04+CD45high microglia and their population abundance were barely detectable in a B6 mouse, confirming assay specificity.
“As expected, the accumulation of CD11b+MeX04+CD45high microglia cells (Figure 5D) and their population abundance (Figure S4D) were barely detectable in a B6 mouse. This confirms the specificity of the assay for the target population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe APP processing pathway term includes Aβ40 and Aβ42 and supports the observation that Spi1 knockout in microglia increases Aβ accumulation and amyloid plaque deposition.
“The pathway term “Protein folding and maturation_Amyloid precursor protein processing”, which includes Aβ40, Aβ42 as the component, further supports our observation that Spi1 knockout in microglia significantly increases Aβ accumulation and amyloid plaque deposition (Figures 2 and 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSpi1 deletion impairs general microglial phagocytic function without affecting cell viability, indicating a crucial role for SPI1 in microglial phagocytosis including Aβ.
“These findings suggest that Spi1 deletion impairs general microglial phagocytic function without affecting cell viability, highlighting the crucial role of SPI1 in regulating microglial phagocytosis, including that of Aβ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMicroglial Spi1 knockout exacerbates gliosis likely due to reduced phagocytic clearance of Aβ, which increases Aβ accumulation and amyloid plaque deposition.
“Our in vivo study demonstrates that microglial Spi1 knockout exacerbates gliosis (Figure 4), likely due to the reduced phagocytic clearance of Aβ (Figure 5), which in turn exacerbates Aβ accumulation (Figure 2) and amyloid plaque deposition (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataConditional Spi1 knockout in microglia exacerbates multiple AD-related pathologies in APPPS1-21 mice, including increased soluble and insoluble Aβ, more amyloid plaques, increased neuroinflammation, and higher dystrophic neurites.
“Our study demonstrates that conditional Spi1 knockout in microglia significantly exacerbates multiple aspects of AD, such as increased soluble and insoluble Aβ levels (Figure 2), more amyloid plaque deposition (Figure 3), increased neuroinflammation including both microgliosis and astrogliosis (Figure 4 and Figure S3), and higher levels of dystrophic neurites (Figure 6) in APPPS1–21 mice.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
“Our data demonstrate that the knockout of Spi1 in microglia exacerbates multiple AD pathologies in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis (Figures 2, 3, 4, and 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · boosted
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSPI1 has a critical regulatory role in microglial function and AD pathogenesis.
“The dramatic effects on AD pathology observed with such a modest decrease in SPI1 levels, including increased amyloid deposition (Figures 2 and 3), higher gliosis (Figure 4), and impaired microglial phagocytosis (Figures 5D,5E,5G,5H), actually underscore the critical regulatory role of SPI1 in microglial function and AD pathogenesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpi1 knockdown attenuates microglial inflammatory response in BV-2 cells, while Spi1 overexpression exacerbates this phenotype.
“For example, Spi1 knockdown attenuates the microglial inflammatory response in BV-2 cells, while its overexpression exacerbates this phenotype25.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Wang, 2022, TREM2 drives microglia response to amyloid-β via SYK-dependent and -independent pathways, Cell source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAPOE loss-of-function variants in cognitively normal elderly individuals are compatible with healthy aging and confer resistance to AD pathology, including absence of neuritic plaques and normal CSF Aβ profiles.
“Chemparathy et al. (2024) identified APOE loss-of-function variants in cognitively normal elderly individuals, demonstrating that these mutations are compatible with healthy aging and confer resistance to AD pathology, including the absence of neuritic plaques and normal CSF Aβ profiles58.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Tate, 2024, APOE loss of function: A genetic shield against Alzheimer’s disease, Neuron source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe conflicting outcome may stem from in vitro models not fully replicating the complexity of the systemic environment.
“This apparently conflicting outcome may stem from a limitation of in vitro model, as cell line experiments cannot fully replicate the complexity of the systemic environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cell line experiments cannot fully replicate the complexity of the systemic environment.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSPI1 has a dual role in Aβ clearance and regulation of inflammatory responses, both essential for effective AD treatment.
“Taken together, these findings underscore the dual role of SPI1 in Aβ clearance and the regulation of inflammatory responses, both of which are essential for effective AD treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSpi1 knockdown attenuates inflammatory response to LPS and Aβ42 in the BV-2 cell line.
“This finding appears to contradict a previous in vitro study, which reported that knockdown of Spi1 attenuates the inflammatory response to LPS and Aβ42 in the BV-2 cell line25.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Wang, 2022, TREM2 drives microglia response to amyloid-β via SYK-dependent and -independent pathways, Cell source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningAβ uptake measurements were normalized to cell viability because Aβ uptake is strongly influenced by cell density.
“Since Aβ uptake is strongly influenced by the cell density, we examined the cell viability after performing the Aβ uptake assay and then calculated Aβ uptake level after normalizing the data based on cell viability (Figure S7B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Aβ uptake is strongly influenced by cell density.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataFunctional interactions between Spi1 and Syk, Lyn, and Fcgr1 occur via pathways enriched in phagocytosis pathways.
“In addition, their functional interactions were suggested to occur via pathways enriched in phagocytosis pathways (Table S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductreasoningUsing non-floxed mice as negative control and injecting tamoxifen to both experimental groups ensured observed effects were not due to leaky Cre activity.
“This approach ensured that any observed effects were not due to leaky Cre activity since we used non-floxed mice as a negative control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Cx3cr1CreER mouse line allows inducible deletion of the Spi1 gene in myeloid cells upon tamoxifen injection.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataImmune response_Phagocytosis was the most enriched network, supporting the validity of functional experiments in Figure 5.
“Our biological pathway enrichment analysis revealed “Immune response_Phagocytosis” as the most enriched network, further supporting the validity of our functional experiments in Figure 5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe in vitro experiments were performed in quadruplicate and independently repeated twice.
“All experiments were performed in quadruplicate and repeated independently twice.”
- Also stated in: § METHOD DETAILS · plain
“All experiments were performed in quadruplicate and repeated independently twice.”
- Also stated in: § METHOD DETAILS · plain
“All experiments were performed in quadruplicate and repeated independently twice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § METHOD DETAILS · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis reduction leads to impaired microglial Aβ clearance, consequently exacerbating AD phenotypes including Aβ accumulation, amyloid plaque deposition, gliosis, and dystrophic neurites.
“This reduction led to the impaired microglial Aβ clearance, consequently exacerbating several phenotypes associated with AD, including Aβ peptides accumulation, amyloid plaque deposition, gliosis, and dystrophic neurites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataReduced Spi1 expression in microglia may worsen AD pathogenesis, contrary to expectation from the peripheral protective allele association.
“These results suggest that reduced Spi1 expression in microglia may actually worsen AD pathogenesis, contrary to what might be expected based on the association of the protective allele and its lower mRNA levels in peripheral immune cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThe SPI1 downstream pathway is a potentially promising avenue for AD therapeutic targets.
“Based on the combined findings from our functional data and mechanistic investigations in this study, SPI1 downstream pathway emerges as a potentially promising avenue for exploring potential therapeutic targets for AD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataAll datasets satisfied equal variance and normality assumptions for the statistical tests used.
“All data sets passed the equal variance test (F test or Brown-Forsythe test) and normality test (Shapiro–Wilk test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSPI1 plays a crucial role in microglial function and AD pathogenesis.
“These results strongly suggest that SPI1 plays a crucial role in microglial function and the pathogenesis of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The role of microglial SPI1 in Alzheimer's disease etiology is still poorly understood.
“However, the role of microglial SPI1 in AD etiology is still poorly understood.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Spi1 is expressed specifically in myeloid cells, and no other brain cell types contribute to Spi1 expression in the brain.
“it was unnecessary with this particular gene because Spi1 is expressed specifically in myeloid cells while no other cell types contribute to Spi1 expression in the brain”
The paper relies on this without support.
Spi1 is predominantly expressed in microglia within the central nervous system.
“Because Spi1 is predominantly expressed in microglia within the CNS, we investigated the effect of microglial Spi1 deletion on neuroinflammation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Spi1 is highly expressed in spleen and peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
“we examined Spi1 expression in both spleen and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), where Spi1 is highly expressed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Aβ uptake is strongly influenced by cell density.
“Since Aβ uptake is strongly influenced by the cell density, we examined the cell viability after performing the Aβ uptake assay and then calculated Aβ uptake level after normalizing the data based on cell viability (Figure S7B).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cell line experiments cannot fully replicate the complexity of the systemic environment.
“This apparently conflicting outcome may stem from a limitation of in vitro model, as cell line experiments cannot fully replicate the complexity of the systemic environment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Cx3cr1CreER mouse line allows inducible deletion of the Spi1 gene in myeloid cells upon tamoxifen injection.
“we utilized the Cx3cr1CreER mouse line that allows the inducible deletion of Spi1 gene in myeloid cells upon the injection of tamoxifen.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In APPPS1-21 mice at 4 months of age, postnatal microglia-specific PU.1 deletion decreases Aβ phagocytosis in the cortex and hippocampus.
“Aβ levels↑, Amyloid burden↑, microgliosis↑, astrogliosis↑, Aβ phagocytosis↓, dystrophic neurites↑”
From Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
The Results section on phagocytic activity (Figure 5C–E; page unavailable) reports significantly reduced Aβ uptake by microglia after Spi1/PU.1 deletion in APPPS1–21 mice, which were evaluated at 4 months of age (Results, Figure 2A). The phagocytosis assay used microglia isolated from harvested brains, not separate cortical and hippocampal measurements; those regional findings concern Aβ levels rather than phagocytosis. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn APPPS1-21 mice at 4 months of age, postnatal microglia-specific PU.1 deletion increases astrogliosis in the cortex and hippocampus.
“Aβ levels↑, Amyloid burden↑, microgliosis↑, astrogliosis↑, Aβ phagocytosis↓, dystrophic neurites↑”
From Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
The Results section, “Deletion of Spi1 in microglia increases microgliosis and astrogliosis” (page unavailable), reports increased GFAP-stained astrogliosis in the cortex of microglia-specific Spi1-deleted APPPS1–21 mice. The Results section on Aβ levels says the mice received tamoxifen at 7 weeks and were evaluated at 4 months. Our copy does not report increased astrogliosis specifically in the hippocampus; its hippocampal findings concern other outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn APPPS1-21 mice at 4 months of age, postnatal microglia-specific PU.1 deletion increases microgliosis in the cortex and hippocampus.
“Aβ levels↑, Amyloid burden↑, microgliosis↑, astrogliosis↑, Aβ phagocytosis↓, dystrophic neurites↑”
From Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
The Results section, “Deletion of Spi1 in microglia increases microgliosis and astrogliosis” (Figure 4B–D; page not available), reports increased IBA1-positive microglial area and cell counts in the cortex after microglial Spi1/PU.1 deletion. The Methods and Results establish postnatal tamoxifen treatment and assessment at 4 months, but the microgliosis passage does not report a corresponding hippocampal increase; hippocampal findings elsewhere concern amyloid and neuritic pathology. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn APPPS1-21 mice at 4 months of age, postnatal microglia-specific PU.1 deletion increases dystrophic neurites in the cortex and hippocampus.
“Aβ levels↑, Amyloid burden↑, microgliosis↑, astrogliosis↑, Aβ phagocytosis↓, dystrophic neurites↑”
From Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
In APPPS1-21 mice at 4 months of age, postnatal microglia-specific PU.1 deletion increases Aβ levels in the cortex and hippocampus.
“Aβ levels↑, Amyloid burden↑, microgliosis↑, astrogliosis↑, Aβ phagocytosis↓, dystrophic neurites↑”
From Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
In APPPS1-21 mice at 4 months of age, postnatal microglia-specific PU.1 deletion increases amyloid burden in the cortex and hippocampus.
“Aβ levels↑, Amyloid burden↑, microgliosis↑, astrogliosis↑, Aβ phagocytosis↓, dystrophic neurites↑”
From Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Figure S2E is assigned to two different sample fractions
MinorFigure S2E is first cited for insoluble Aβ in cortical tissue, then cited for the RIPA-soluble cortical fraction. Those are distinct measurements.
“there was a significant correlation between insoluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in both in cortical and hippocampal tissues (Figures S2E and S2F, respectively)”
“as well as in the PBS and RIPA fractions of cortical tissue (Figures S2G and S2E, respectively) from these mice.”
Experimental mice are described as their own controls
MinorThe comparison names Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1-21 mice on both sides, but the following sentence identifies Spi1wt;APPPS1-21 mice as the control group.
“we analyzed plaque-associated microglia in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 controls.”
“The area of plaque covered by the IBA1+ microglial cluster was significantly reduced by 22.7% in Spi1ΔMG;APPPS1–21 mice compared to Spi1wt;APPPS1–21 mice (Figure 5B).”
Cited works that were retracted
Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.
Cites a retracted work: 10.1093/hmg/ddu412
MajorThe cited work was retracted on 2024-08-15 (notice 10.1093/hmg/ddae114), before this paper was published (2026-08). Its authors could have known.
Cited work 10.1093/hmg/ddu412 · retracted 2024-08-15 · notice 10.1093/hmg/ddae114 · this paper published 2026-08
“Joshi, 2014, Absence of ALOX5 gene prevents stress-induced memory deficits, synaptic dysfunction and tauopathy in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, Hum. Mol. Genet., 23, 6894, 10.1093/hmg/ddu412”
Cites
1 retracted
Joshi, Y. B., Giannopoulos, P. F., Chu, J., Sperow, M., Kirby, L. G., Abood, M. E., & Praticò, D. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu412 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
RetractedFiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890 · see citing works
Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease
Heneka, M. T., Carson, M. J., Khoury, J. E., Landreth, G. E., Brosseron, F., Feinstein, D. L., Jacobs, A. H., Wyss-Coray, T., Vitorica, J., Ransohoff, R. M., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)70016-5 · Cited by 6,226 · see citing works
A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease
Keren-Shaul, H., Spinrad, A., Weiner, A., Matcovitch-Natan, O., Dvir-Szternfeld, R., Ulland, T. K., David, E., Baruch, K., Lara-Astaiso, D., Toth, B., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018 · Cited by 5,493 · see citing works
The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
DeTure, M. A., & Dickson, D. W. (2019) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-019-0333-5 · Cited by 3,329 · see citing works
Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC), Kunkle, B. W., The European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (EADI), Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium (CHARGE), Genetic and Environmental Risk in AD/Defining Genetic, P. A. E. R. F. A. D. C. (., Grenier-Boley, B., Sims, R., Bis, J. C., Damotte, V., Naj, A. C., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2 · Cited by 2,946 · see citing works
Microglia promote learning-dependent synapse formation through brain-derived neurotrophic factor
Parkhurst, C. N., Yang, G., Ninan, I., Savas, J. N., Yates, J. R., Lafaille, J. J., Hempstead, B. L., Littman, D. R., & Gan, W.-B. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.030 · Cited by 2,599 · see citing works
Disease-Associated Microglia: A Universal Immune Sensor of Neurodegeneration
Deczkowska, A., Keren-Shaul, H., Weiner, A., Colonna, M., Schwartz, M., & Amit, I. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.003 · Cited by 1,474 · see citing works
Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways
Kierdorf, K., Erny, D., Goldmann, T., Sander, V., Schulz, C., Perdiguero, E. G., Wieghofer, P., Heinrich, A., Riemke, P., Hölscher, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3318 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Wightman, D. P., Jansen, I. E., Savage, J. E., Shadrin, A. A., Bahrami, S., Holland, D., Rongve, A., Børte, S., Winsvold, B. S., Drange, O. K., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00921-z · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Aβ42‐driven cerebral amyloidosis in transgenic mice reveals early and robust pathology
Radde, R., Bolmont, T., Kaeser, S. A., Coomaraswamy, J., Lindau, D., Stoltze, L., Calhoun, M. E., Jäggi, F., Wolburg, H., Gengler, S., et al. (2006) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400784 · Cited by 986 · see citing works
Microglia in Alzheimer's disease
Sarlus, H., & Heneka, M. T. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci90606 · Cited by 911 · see citing works
Microglia constitute a barrier that prevents neurotoxic protofibrillar Aβ42 hotspots around plaques
Condello, C., Yuan, P., Schain, A., & Grutzendler, J. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7176 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
The role of microglia in amyloid clearance from the AD brain
Lee, C. Y. D., & Landreth, G. E. (2010) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-010-0433-4 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer disease
Heneka, M. T., van der Flier, W. M., Jessen, F., Hoozemanns, J., Thal, D. R., Boche, D., Brosseron, F., Teunissen, C., Zetterberg, H., Jacobs, A. H., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-024-01104-7 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
The Alzheimer's disease Beta-secretase enzyme, BACE1
Cole, S. L., & Vassar, R. (2007) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/1750-1326-2-22 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Mertins, P., Tang, L. C., Krug, K., Clark, D. J., Gritsenko, M., Chen, L., Clauser, K. R., Clauss, T. R., Shah, P., Gillette, M. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0006-9 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
TREM2 drives microglia response to amyloid-β via SYK-dependent and -independent pathways
Wang, S., Sudan, R., Peng, V., Zhou, Y., Du, S., Yuede, C. M., Lei, T., Hou, J., Cai, Z., Cella, M., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.033 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, J., Vranken, J. G. V., Vaites, L. P., Schweppe, D. K., Huttlin, E. L., Etienne, C. L., Nandhikonda, P., Viner, R., Robitaille, A. M., Thompson, A. H., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0781-4 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Iwasaki, H., Somoza, C., Shigematsu, H., Duprez, E. A., Iwasaki-Arai, J., Mizuno, S.-I., Arinobu, Y., Geary, K., Zhang, P., Dayaram, T., et al. (2005) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2005-03-0860 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
A common haplotype lowers PU.1 expression in myeloid cells and delays onset of Alzheimer's disease
The International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project, Huang, K.-L., Initiative, T. A. D. N., Marcora, E., Pimenova, A. A., Di Narzo, A. F., Kapoor, M., Jin, S. C., Harari, O., Bertelsen, S., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4587 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Gowrishankar, S., Yuan, P., Wu, Y., Schrag, M., Paradise, S., Grutzendler, J., De Camilli, P., & Ferguson, S. M. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510329112 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Preparing Synthetic Aβ in Different Aggregation States
Stine, W. B., Jungbauer, L., Yu, C., & LaDu, M. J. (2010) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-744-0_2 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
The complex genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease: novel insights and future directions
Andrews, S. J., Renton, A. E., Fulton-Howard, B., Podlesny-Drabiniok, A., Marcora, E., & Goate, A. M. (2023) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104511 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Boza-Serrano, A., Ruiz, R., Sanchez-Varo, R., García-Revilla, J., Yang, Y., Jimenez-Ferrer, I., Paulus, A., Wennström, M., Vilalta, A., Allendorf, D., et al. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-019-02013-z · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Association of Microglia with Amyloid Plaques in Brains of APP23 Transgenic Mice
Stalder, M., Phinney, A., Probst, A., Sommer, B., Staufenbiel, M., & Jucker, M. (1999) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65423-5 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Cell-specific deletion of C1qa identifies microglia as the dominant source of C1q in mouse brain
Fonseca, M. I., Chu, S.-H., Hernandez, M. X., Fang, M. J., Modarresi, L., Selvan, P., MacGregor, G. R., & Tenner, A. J. (2017) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-017-0814-9 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Mutant Huntingtin promotes autonomous microglia activation via myeloid lineage-determining factors
Crotti, A., Benner, C., Kerman, B. E., Gosselin, D., Lagier-Tourenne, C., Zuccato, C., Cattaneo, E., Gage, F. H., Cleveland, D. W., & Glass, C. K. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3668 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
SYK coordinates neuroprotective microglial responses in neurodegenerative disease
Ennerfelt, H., Frost, E. L., Shapiro, D. A., Holliday, C., Zengeler, K. E., Voithofer, G., Bolte, A. C., Lammert, C. R., Kulas, J. A., Ulland, T. K., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.030 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Off-Line High-pH Reversed-Phase Fractionation for In-Depth Phosphoproteomics
Batth, T. S., Francavilla, C., & Olsen, J. V. (2014) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr500893m · Cited by 328 · see citing works
ApoE facilitates the microglial response to amyloid plaque pathology
Ulrich, J. D., Ulland, T. K., Mahan, T. E., Nyström, S., Nilsson, K. P., Song, W. M., Zhou, Y., Reinartz, M., Choi, S., Jiang, H., et al. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20171265 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Sadleir, K. R., Kandalepas, P. C., Buggia-Prévot, V., Nicholson, D. A., Thinakaran, G., & Vassar, R. (2016) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1558-9 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Styren, S. D., Hamilton, R. L., Styren, G. C., & Klunk, W. E. (2000) · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · doi:10.1177/002215540004800906 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Immune cells and CNS physiology: Microglia and beyond
Norris, G. T., & Kipnis, J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20180199 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Lopes, K. D. P., Snijders, G. J. L., Humphrey, J., Allan, A., Sneeboer, M. A. M., Navarro, E., Schilder, B. M., Vialle, R. A., Parks, M., Missall, R., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00976-y · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Microglial translational profiling reveals a convergent APOE pathway from aging, amyloid, and tau
Kang, S. S., Ebbert, M. T. W., Baker, K. E., Cook, C., Wang, X., Sens, J. P., Kocher, J.-P., Petrucelli, L., & Fryer, J. D. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20180653 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Kim, J., Jiang, H., Park, S., Eltorai, A. E. M., Stewart, F. R., Yoon, H., Basak, J. M., Finn, M. B., & Holtzman, D. M. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3773-11.2011 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationBien-Ly, N., Gillespie, A. K., Walker, D., Yoon, S. Y., & Huang, Y. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0033-12.2012 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Galectin-3, a rising star in modulating microglia activation under conditions of neurodegeneration
García-Revilla, J., Boza-Serrano, A., Espinosa-Oliva, A. M., Soto, M. S., Deierborg, T., Ruiz, R., de Pablos, R. M., Burguillos, M. A., & Venero, J. L. (2022) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-022-05058-3 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
The key role of PU.1/SPI-1 in B cells, myeloid cells and macrophages
Lloberas, J., Soler, C., & Celada, A. (1999) · Immunology Today · doi:10.1016/s0167-5699(99)01442-5 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Alzheimer's-associated PU.1 expression levels regulate microglial inflammatory response
Pimenova, A. A., Herbinet, M., Gupta, I., Machlovi, S. I., Bowles, K. R., Marcora, E., & Goate, A. M. (2021) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105217 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Bai, B., Tan, H., Pagala, V., High, A. A., Ichhaporia, V. P., Hendershot, L. M., & Peng, J. (2016) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2016.10.007 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Pathogenic Upregulation of Glial Lipocalin-2 in the Parkinsonian Dopaminergic System
Kim, B.-W., Jeong, K. H., Kim, J., Jin, M., Kim, J., Lee, M., Choi, D., Won, S.-Y., McLean, C., Jeon, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4261-15.2016 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationTzioras, M., Daniels, M. J. D., Davies, C., Baxter, P. S., King, D., McKay, S., Varga, B. V., Popovic, K., Hernandez, M., Stevenson, A. J., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101175 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Sahasrabuddhe, V., & Ghosh, H. S. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110252 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Zhou, N., Liu, K., Sun, Y., Cao, Y., & Yang, J. (2019) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-018-0599-3 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Lista, S., Imbimbo, B. P., Grasso, M., Fidilio, A., Emanuele, E., Minoretti, P., López-Ortiz, S., Martín-Hernández, J., Gabelle, A., Caruso, G., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-024-03163-y · Cited by 81 · see citing works
A comprehensive profile of ChIP-Seq-based PU.1/Spi1 target genes in microglia.
Satoh, J.-I., Asahina, N., Kitano, S., & Kino, Y. (2014) · Gene Regulation and Systems Biology · doi:10.4137/grsb.s19711 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Walton, M. R., Gibbons, H., MacGibbon, G. A., Sirimanne, E., Saura, J., Gluckman, P. D., & Dragunow, M. (2000) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/s0165-5728(99)00262-3 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Cryo-EM structures of prion protein filaments from Gerstmann–Sträussler–Scheinker disease
Hallinan, G. I., Ozcan, K. A., Hoq, M. R., Cracco, L., Vago, F. S., Bharath, S. R., Li, D., Jacobsen, M. H., Doud, E. H., Mosley, A. L., et al. (2022) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-022-02461-0 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationBoza-Serrano, A., Vrillon, A., Minta, K., Paulus, A., Camprubí-Ferrer, L., Garcia, M., Andreasson, U., Antonell, A., Wennström, M., Gouras, G., et al. (2022) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-022-02469-6 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Levasseur, E. M., Yamada, K., Piñeros, A. R., Wu, W., Syed, F., Orr, K. S., Anderson‐Baucum, E. K., Mastracci, T. L., Maier, B., Mosley, A. L., et al. (2019) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aax0715 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationLee, J. H., Cheng, R., Vardarajan, B., Lantigua, R., Reyes-Dumeyer, D., Ortmann, W., Graham, R. R., Bhangale, T., Behrens, T. W., Medrano, M., et al. (2015) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1424 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Karahan, H., Smith, D. C., Kim, B., Dabin, L. C., Al-Amin, M. M., Wijeratne, H. R. S., Pennington, T., Viana di Prisco, G., McCord, B., Lin, P. B.-C., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe3954 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationChoi, J., Gao, J., Kim, J., Hong, C., Kim, J., & Tontonoz, P. (2015) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aad1904 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationSTOP floxing around: Specificity and leakiness of inducible Cre/loxP systems
Stifter, S. A., & Greter, M. (2020) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.202048546 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Hassiotis, S., Manavis, J., Blumbergs, P. C., Hattersley, K. J., Carosi, J. M., Kamei, M., & Sargeant, T. J. (2018) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13913 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Chemparathy, A., Le Guen, Y., Chen, S., Lee, E.-G., Leong, L., Gorzynski, J. E., Jensen, T. D., Ferrasse, A., Xu, G., Xiang, H., et al. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.01.008 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Jones, R. E., Andrews, R., Holmans, P., Hill, M., & Taylor, P. R. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94324-z · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Šerý, O., Hlinecká, L., Povová, J., Bonczek, O., Zeman, T., Janout, V., Ambrož, P., Khan, N. A., & Balcar, V. J. (2016) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.022 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
A novel molecular class that recruits HDAC/MECP2 complexes to PU.1 motifs reduces neuroinflammation
Ralvenius, W. T., Mungenast, A. E., Woolf, H., Huston, M. M., Gillingham, T. Z., Godin, S. K., Penney, J., Cam, H. P., Gao, F., Fernandez, C. G., et al. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20222105 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Kim, B., Dabin, L. C., Tate, M. D., Karahan, H., Sharify, A. D., Acri, D. J., Al-Amin, M. M., Philtjens, S., Smith, D. C., Wijeratne, H. R. S., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48484-x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationGrecco, G. G., Haggerty, D. L., Doud, E. H., Fritz, B. M., Yin, F., Hoffman, H., Mosley, A. L., Simpson, E. R., Liu, Y., Baucum, A. J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.15226 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationLancaster, M. S., Kim, B., Doud, E. H., Tate, M. D., Sharify, A. D., Gao, H., Chen, D., Simpson, E., Gillespie, P., Chu, X., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113241 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationIllouz, T., Nicola, R., Ben-Shushan, L., Madar, R., Biragyn, A., & Okun, E. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01851-6 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
The effect of Abi3 locus deletion on the progression of Alzheimer’s disease-related pathologies
Karahan, H., Smith, D. C., Kim, B., McCord, B., Mantor, J., John, S. K., Al-Amin, M. M., Dabin, L. C., & Kim, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1102530 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationClinical Aspects of Alzheimer’s Disease
Kumfor, F., Halliday, G. M., & Piguet, O. (2017) · Advances in neurobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57193-5_2 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Tate, M., Wijeratne, H. R. S., Kim, B., Philtjens, S., You, Y., Lee, D., Gutierrez, D. A., Sharify, D., Wells, M., Perez‐Cardelo, M., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14243 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationIslam, R., Rajan, R., Choudhary, H., Vrionis, F., & Hanafy, K. A. (2024) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.30916 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Pu.1/Spi1 dosage controls the turnover and maintenance of microglia in zebrafish and mammals
Wu, Y., Guo, W., Kuang, H., Wu, X., Trinh, T. H., Wang, Y., Zhao, S., Wen, Z., & Yu, T. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105788 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Lyu, W., Wang, H., Ji, T., Liu, L., Chen, H., Fan, L., Zhong, G., Wan, N., Chen, S., Chen, J., et al. (2025) · Clinical and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/ctm2.70217 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Kim, B.-W., Park, J., Cho, D.-Y., Ko, H. M., Yoon, S., & Choi, D. (2019) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107928 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationAPOE loss of function: A genetic shield against Alzheimer’s disease
Tate, M. D., Karahan, H., & Kim, J. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.03.003 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When less is more and when it isn’t: Microglial Spi1 and the limits of what we know
Koldamova, R., Fitz, N. F., & Lefterov, I. (2026) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2026.06.017
Abdelaziz, A. M., & Eladawy, R. M. (2026) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2026.118381 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liu, A., Xing, L., Li, J., Gao, W., Yao, M., Song, J., & Li, H. (2026) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2026.103352
Ramani, M., Nguyen, N., Solis, J., Tenen, D. G., & Trinh, B. Q. (2026) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology15181657
“Experimental studies have shown that lowering PU.1 can reduce amyloid plaque burden in some models, whereas PU.1 is also required for certain protective phagocytic programs [180,182].”
Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease
Kim, B., Wang, S. S., Kim, J. R., & Kim, J. (2026) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.70186
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kim, B., Tate, M. D., Karahan, H., Wijeratne, H. R. S., Sharify, A. D., Wang, S. S., Kim, J. R., Al-Amin, M. M., Hartigan, K., Chung, S., Dabin, L. C., Acri, D. J., Doud, E. H., John, S. K., Mosley, A. L., & Kim, J.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-08
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2741-2758.e6
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13051965
- OpenAlex
- W7146956682
- Semantic Scholar
- 3eae0ed49cfdc9a7dd8ac643a0d06d76b785d99a
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6
- FWCI
- 16.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Indiana University Foundation Inc
- Alzheimer's Association (AARF-21-852175)
- National Institute on Aging (F31AG074673, T32AG071444, F30AG079580, R01AG077829, R01AG071281, RF1AG074543, R21AG072738)
- Indiana University
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- PU.1, microglia, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, amyloid plaques, microglial phagocytosis, Syk, Lyn kinase, gliosis, dystrophic neurites, microglial activation, transcription factor deletion
- MeSH terms
- Proto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Transgenic, Phagocytosis, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Trans-Activators, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Microglia, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review