Cited by 72Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Preclinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacology and toxicology of lisdexamfetamine: A novel d-amphetamine pro-drug

Hutson, Peter H., Pennick, Michael, Secker, Roger·2014·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a novel pro-drug of d-amphetamine that is currently used for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children aged ≥ 6 years and adults. LDX is enzymatically cleaved to form d-amphetamine following contact with red blood cells, which reduces the rate of appearance and magnitude of d-amphetamine concentration in the blood and hence the brain when compared with immediate-release d-amphetamine at equimolar doses. Thus, the increase of striatal dopamine efflux and subsequent increase of locomotor activity following d-amphetamine is less prominent and slower to attain maximal effect following an equimolar dose of LDX. Furthermore, unlike d-amphetamine, the pharmacodynamic effects of LDX are independent of the route of administration underlining the requirement to be hydrolyzed by contact with red blood cells. It is conceivable that these pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences may impact the psychostimulant properties of LDX in the clinic. This article reviews the preclinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacology, and toxicology of LDX. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.02.014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutson, P. H., Pennick, M., & Secker, R.
Affiliations
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
  • Shire (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Hutson, Peter H.
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
87
Pages
41-50
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049014891
Cited by
72
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shire Development LLC (Wayne PA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, locomotor activity, psychostimulants, toxicity
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Brain, Dextroamphetamine, Humans, Prodrugs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review