Cited by 310Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ability to decide advantageously declines prematurely in some normal older persons

Denburg, N.L., Tranel, D., Bechara, A.·2005·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

The prefrontal region of the brain, including the ventromedial sector which supports reasoning and decision-making, may undergo disproportionate aging in some older persons, but the empirical evidence is decidedly mixed. To help resolve this, we tested 80 neurologically and psychiatrically healthy Younger (aged 26-55) and Older (aged 56-85) adults on a "Gambling Task", which provides a close analog to real-world decision-making by factoring in reward, punishment, and unpredictability, yielding a sensitive index of ventromedial prefrontal function. A subset of the Older group manifested a decision-making impairment on the Gambling Task, in spite of otherwise intact cognitive functioning. This finding raises the possibility of disproportionate aging of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in these individuals. Our finding has important societal and public policy implications (e.g., choosing medical care, allocating personal wealth), and may also help explain why many older individuals are targeted by and susceptible to fraudulent advertising.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.012

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Denburg, 2001, Iowa gambling task performance in elderly persons predicts susceptibility to the influence of misleading advertising, Society for Neuroscience, 27

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 310

Metadata

Authors
Denburg, N. L., Tranel, D., & Bechara, A.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Denburg, N.L.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
1099-1106
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984128842
Cited by
310
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 31
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K01AG022033)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01 NS19632, P01NS019632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
decision-making, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, brain aging, older adults, gambling task, cognitive aging, reward and punishment, fraud susceptibility, normal aging
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Decision Making, Female, Gambling, Games, Experimental, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review