The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hearing lips and seeing voices
MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/264746a0 · Cited by 6,183
Visual Contribution to Speech Intelligibility in Noise
Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907309 · Cited by 2,583 · cited 1×
“For nstance, a congruent facial display (articulating the audio peech) provides critical cues in noisy environments (Helfer, 997; MacLeod & Summerfield, 1990; Sumby & Pollack, 1954) nd benefits hearing-impaired listeners (Grant, Walden, & Seitz, 998).”
BackgroundRisto, N. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429487354 · Cited by 2,024
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4365 · Cited by 1,882
Poeppel, D. (2003) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(02)00107-3 · Cited by 1,315
Self-citationTemporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects
Rosen, S. (1992) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0070 · Cited by 1,130
Calvert, G. A., Campbell, R., & Brammer, M. J. (2000) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00513-3 · Cited by 954
Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech
van Wassenhove, V., Grant, K. W., & Poeppel, D. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408949102 · Cited by 854
Self-citationDeterminants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors
Meredith, M., Nemitz, J., & Stein, B. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-10-03215.1987 · Cited by 754
Perceived order in different sense modalities.
Hirsh, I. J., & Sherrick, C. E. (1961) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045283 · Cited by 697
Cited by
Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review
Spence, C. (2011) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7 · Cited by 1,618
The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances
Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., Lyxell, B., Dahlström, Ö., Signoret, C., Stenfelt, S., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., et al. (2013) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031 · Cited by 989
The Natural Statistics of Audiovisual Speech
Chandrasekaran, C., Trubanova, A., Stillittano, S., Caplier, A., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000436 · Cited by 630
Neuronal oscillations and visual amplification of speech
Schroeder, C. E., Lakatos, P., Kajikawa, Y., Partan, S., & Puce, A. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.002 · Cited by 498
Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication
Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- van Wassenhove, V., Grant, K. W., & Poeppel, D.
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 598-607
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071932093
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 18.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.001
- The paper
- van Wassenhove, V., Grant, K. W., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
