Cited by 80Sexual Differentiation and DisordersAdrenal Hormones and DisordersStress Responses and Cortisol

Amygdala function in adolescents with congenital adrenal hyperplasia: a model for the study of early steroid abnormalities

Open access
ERNST, M, MAHEU, F, SCHROTH, E, HARDIN, J, GOLAN, L, CAMERON, J, ALLEN, R, HOLZER, S +2 more·2007·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Early disruption of steroids affects the development of mammalian neural circuits underlying affective processes. In humans, patients with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) can serve as a natural model to study early hormonal alterations on functional brain development. CAH is characterized by congenital glucocorticoid insufficiency, leading to altered hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) function, and hyperandrogenism. Using fMRI, we compared fourteen adolescents with CAH to 14 healthy controls on amygdala response to a face viewing task. In response to negative facial emotions, CAH females activated the amygdala significantly more than healthy females, whereas CAH males did not differ from control males. Furthermore, females with CAH showed a similar pattern of amygdala activation to control males, suggesting virilized amygdala function in females with CAH. These findings suggest a prominent effect of early hyperandrogenism on the development and function of the amygdala in females with CAH, whereas no effects were detected in males with CAH. This study provides data that can be further tested in a model of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying early androgen organizational effects on amygdala function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.019

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ERNST, M., MAHEU, F., SCHROTH, E., HARDIN, J., GOLAN, L., CAMERON, J., ALLEN, R., HOLZER, S., NELSON, E., & PINE, D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
2104-2113
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989059680
Cited by
80
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
congenital adrenal hyperplasia, amygdala, hyperandrogenism, glucocorticoid insufficiency, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, face processing, negative emotions, sex differences, brain development, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital, Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Child, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Biological, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Sex Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review