Cited by 105Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Response inhibition is associated with white matter microstructure in children.

Open access

Abstract

Cognitive control of thoughts, actions and emotions is important for normal behaviour and the development of such control continues throughout childhood and adolescence. Several lines of evidence suggest that response inhibition is primarily mediated by a right-lateralized network involving inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), presupplementary motor cortex (preSMA), and subthalamic nucleus. Though the brain's fibre tracts are known to develop during childhood, little is known about how fibre tract development within this network relates to developing behavioural control. Here we examined the relationship between response inhibition, as measured with the stop-signal task, and indices of regional white matter microstructure in typically-developing children. We hypothesized that better response inhibition performance would be associated with higher fractional anisotropy (FA) in fibre tracts within right IFG and preSMA after controlling for age. Mean FA and diffusivity values were extracted from right and left IFG and preSMA. As hypothesized, faster response inhibition was significantly associated with higher FA and lower perpendicular diffusivity in both the right IFG and the right preSMA, possibly reflecting faster speed of neural conduction within more densely packed or better myelinated fibre tracts. Moreover, both of these effects remained significant after controlling for age and whole brain estimates of these DTI parameters. Interestingly, right IFG and preSMA FA contributed additively to the prediction of performance variability. Observed associations may be related to variation in phase of maturation, to activity-dependent alterations in the network subserving response inhibition, or to stable individual differences in underlying neural system connectivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.001

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 60 references

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cohen, 2007, Neural substrates of response inhibition in children examined with fMRI, Neuroimage, 36

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
Madsen, K. S., Baaré, W. F. C., Vestergaard, M., Skimminge, A., Ejersbo, L. R., Ramsøy, T. Z., Gerlach, C., Åkeson, P., Paulson, O. B., & Jernigan, T. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Madsen, Kathrine Skak
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
854-862
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102236305
Cited by
104
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
  • Lundbeckfonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
response inhibition, white matter microstructure, cognitive control, children, inferior frontal gyrus, pre-supplementary motor area, fractional anisotropy, stop-signal task, brain maturation, individual differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Brain, Child, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Inhibition, Psychological, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Cortex, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review