Cited by 367Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 191 of the 191 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The inferior parietal lobule and temporoparietal junction: A network perspective

Abstract

Information processing in specialized, spatially distributed brain networks underlies the diversity and complexity of our cognitive and behavioral repertoire. Networks converge at a small number of hubs - highly connected regions that are central for multimodal integration and higher-order cognition. We review one major network hub of the human brain: the inferior parietal lobule and the overlapping temporoparietal junction (IPL/TPJ). The IPL is greatly expanded in humans compared to other primates and matures late in human development, consistent with its importance in higher-order functions. Evidence from neuroimaging studies suggests that the IPL/TPJ participates in a broad range of behaviors and functions, from bottom-up perception to cognitive capacities that are uniquely human. The organization of the IPL/TPJ is challenging to study due to the complex anatomy and high inter-individual variability of this cortical region. In this review we aimed to synthesize findings from anatomical and functional studies of the IPL/TPJ that used neuroimaging at rest and during a wide range of tasks. The first half of the review describes subdivisions of the IPL/TPJ identified using cytoarchitectonics, resting-state functional connectivity analysis and structural connectivity methods. The second half of the article reviews IPL/TPJ activations and network participation in bottom-up attention, lower-order self-perception, undirected thinking, episodic memory and social cognition. The central theme of this review is to discuss how network nodes within the IPL/TPJ are organized and how they participate in human perception and cognition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.001

Cites

191 of 191 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 191 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Igelström, K. M., & Graziano, M. S. A.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Igelström, Kajsa M.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
105
Pages
70-83
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2569940591
Cited by
367
References
191
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Princeton Neuroscience Institute Innovation Fund
  • Simons Foundation (458785)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
inferior parietal lobule, temporoparietal junction, brain networks, network hubs, cytoarchitecture, resting-state functional connectivity, structural connectivity, bottom-up attention, self-perception, episodic memory, social cognition, human cognition, human evolution, brain development
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review