The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The functional neuroanatomy of working memory: Contributions of human brain lesion studies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Working memory: Looking back and looking forward
Baddeley, A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1201 · Cited by 5,200
Distant influences of amygdala lesion on visual cortical activation during emotional face processing
Vuilleumier, P., Richardson, M. P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1341 · Cited by 955
Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks
Knight, R. T., Richard Staines, W., Swick, D., & Chao, L. L. (1999) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00004-9 · Cited by 498
Self-citationThompson-Schill, S. L., Swick, D., Farah, M. J., D’Esposito, M., Kan, I. P., & Knight, R. T. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.26.15855 · Cited by 488
Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans
Barceló, F., Suwazono, S., & Knight, R. T. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/73975 · Cited by 374
Self-citationGo–no go learning after frontal lobe lesions in humans
Drewe, E. A. (1975) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(75)80015-3 · Cited by 369
The dependence of span and delayed-response performance on prefrontal cortex.
D’Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (1999) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00021-4 · Cited by 350
Both random and perseverative errors underlie WCST deficits in prefrontal patients
Barceló, F., & Knight, R. T. (2002) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00110-5 · Cited by 295
Self-citationGating of somatosensory input by human prefrontal cortex
Yamaguchi, S., & Knight, R. T. (1990) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(90)91553-s · Cited by 152 · cited 1×
“night and colleagues (Knight et al., 1980, 1989, 1999; amaguchi and Knight, 1990; Chao and Knight, 1995) eported increased neurophysiological responses to irrel-”
BackgroundSelf-citationMüller, N. G., Machado, L., & Knight, R. T. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290260138582 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Cited by
Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function
Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0 · Cited by 5,592
Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model
Menon, V. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 · Cited by 4,168
Sridharan, D., Levitin, D. J., & Menon, V. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800005105 · Cited by 2,892
Aron, A. R. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024 · Cited by 1,236
The Neural Basis of Inhibition in Cognitive Control
Aron, A. R. (2007) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858407299288 · Cited by 1,098
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, N. G., & Knight, R. T.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-58
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047959911
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The functional neuroanatomy of working memory: Contributions of human brain lesion studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.09.018
- The paper
- Müller, N. G., & Knight, R. T. (2006). The functional neuroanatomy of working memory: Contributions of human brain lesion studies. Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.09.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
