Cited by 117Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationMemory Processes and Influences

The neuroscience of remote spatial memory: A tale of two cities

Spiers, H.J., Maguire, E.A.·2007·Neuroscience

Abstract

Most of our everyday activities take place in familiar environments learned in the past which we need to constantly navigate. Despite our obvious reliance on these remote spatial memories, until quite recently relatively little was known about how they are instantiated in the human brain. Here we will consider developments in the neuropsychological and neuroimaging domains where innovative methodologies and novel analysis techniques are providing new opportunities for exploring the brain dynamics underpinning the retrieval and use of remotely learned spatial information. These advances allow three key questions to be considered anew: What brain areas in humans support the retrieval and use of remotely learned spatial information? Where in the brain are spatial memories stored? Do findings relating to remote spatial memory inform theoretical debates about memory consolidation? In particular, the hippocampus, parahippocampus, retrosplenial and parietal cortices are scrutinized, revealing new insights into their specific contributions to representing spaces and places from the past.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.06.056

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • K.C. was impaired in remembering minor landmarks and perceptual details of familiar environments, despite largely intact visuoperceptual processing abilities and semantic knowledge of those same places.

    “K.C. was impaired, however, in remembering minor landmarks and perceptual details of familiar environments, despite having largely intact visuoperceptual processing abilities and semantic knowledge of those same places.”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

  • K.C., an individual with bilateral HPC damage, could produce accurate sketch maps of the overall layout of his hometown and judge relative distances and directions between its major landmarks.

    “This was demonstrated in the case K.C., an individual with bilateral HPC damage, who could produce accurate sketch maps of the overall layout of his hometown (Fig. 3) and judge relative distances and directions between its major landmarks 27,81,82 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Schematic aspects of remote spatial memories are those features that survive HPC damage and continue to support navigation.

    “Schematic aspects of remote spatial memories are those features that survive HPC damage and continue to support navigation 27,80 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Schematized spatial memories primarily include geometric properties rather than surface properties.

    “Schematized spatial memories primarily include geometric properties [G], rather than surface properties [G] 27,70,80,83 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

  • The posterior HPC supports detailed cognitive maps, whereas a network of extra-HPC regions including PHC, RSC and PPC supports cognitive maps transformed over repeated experiences into a spatial gist.

    “Thus, whereas the (posterior) HPC seems to support detailed cognitive maps, a network of extra-HPC regions, including the parahippocampal cortex (PHC), RSC and PPC, seems to support cognitive maps that have been transformed over repeated experiences navigating in a particular environment to form a 'spatial gist' -a summary of a specific environment 25,27,127,128 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 113 · Cited by 117

Authors
Spiers, H. J., & Maguire, E. A.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Spiers, H.J.
  • Maguire, E.A.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
149
Issue
1
Pages
7-27
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997370156
Cited by
117
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (071173)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
spatial memory, memory retrieval, memory consolidation, hippocampus, parahippocampal cortex, retrosplenial cortex, parietal cortex, representation of place, brain dynamics
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Brain, Brain Injuries, Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Neurosciences, Oxygen, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review