Cited by 107Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchStress Responses and CortisolPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Gender-dependent behavioral and biochemical effects of adolescent delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in adult maternally deprived rats.

Zamberletti, E., Prini, P., Speziali, S., Gabaglio, M., Solinas, M., Parolaro, D., Rubino, T.·2012·Neuroscience

Abstract

Preclinical data support the long-term adverse effects on cognition, emotionality, and psychotic-like behaviors of adolescent exposure to natural and synthetic cannabinoids. To investigate whether the long-lasting adverse effects induced by cannabinoids in adolescence are influenced by early-life stress, female and male rats were subjected to 24-h maternal deprivation at postnatal day (PND) 9 and treated with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) during adolescence (PND 35-45) according to our previously reported protocol. At adulthood, rats were tested in the novel object recognition, social interaction, and forced swim tests, to evaluate possible alterations in recognition memory, social behavior, and coping strategy. Moreover, cannabinoid CB1 receptor density and functionality, as well as NMDA and dopamine D1 and D2 receptor densities were measured through autoradiographic binding studies. In female maternally deprived rats, THC failed to impair recognition memory, counteracted aggressiveness induced by maternal deprivation, whereas no interaction was observed in the passive coping behavior. In males, the association of the two events increased passive coping response without affecting other behaviors. This behavioral picture was accompanied by gender-dependent and region-specific alterations in NMDA, D1 and D2 receptors. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that adolescent THC exposure might have different behavioral outcomes in animals previously exposed to early-life stress comp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.11.038

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zamberletti, E., Prini, P., Speziali, S., Gabaglio, M., Solinas, M., Parolaro, D., & Rubino, T.
Affiliations
University of Insubria (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Parolaro, D.
  • Rubino, T.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
204
Pages
245-257
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084070896
Cited by
107
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
maternal deprivation, early life stress, sex differences, CB1 receptor, NMDA receptor, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, recognition memory, social behavior, passive coping, aggression
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Female, Male, Maternal Deprivation, Memory, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Dronabinol, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review