Cited by 24Particle Detector Development and PerformanceRadiation Therapy and DosimetryRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies

Geant4: physics potential for instrumentation in space and medicine

Ivanchenko, V.N·2004·Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nima.2004.03.104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivanchenko, V. N.
Affiliations
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (RU)
Corresponding author
Ivanchenko, V.N
Venue
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
525
Issue
1-2
Pages
402-405
ISSN
0168-9002 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969255096
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle Detector Development and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Keywords
Geant4, particle transport simulation, Monte Carlo simulation, space instrumentation, medical instrumentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review