Cited by 71Planetary Science and ExplorationRadiation Therapy and DosimetryAstro and Planetary Science

Measurements of the neutron spectrum on the Martian surface with MSL/RAD

Open access
Köhler, J., Zeitlin, C., Ehresmann, B., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., Hassler, D. M., Reitz, G., Brinza, D. E., Weigle, G. +9 more·2014·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

The Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD), onboard the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) rover Curiosity, measures the energetic charged and neutral particles and the radiation dose rate on the surface of Mars. An important factor for determining the biological impact of the Martian surface radiation is the specific contribution of neutrons, with their deeper penetration depth and ensuing high biological effectiveness. This is very difficult to measure quantitatively, resulting in considerable uncertainties in the total radiation dose. In contrast to charged particles, neutral particles (neutrons and gamma rays) are generally only measured indirectly. Measured spectra are a complex convolution of the incident particle spectrum with the detector response function and must be unfolded. We apply an inversion method (based on a maximum likelihood estimation) to calculate the neutron and gamma spectra from the RAD neutral particle measurements. Here we show the first spectra on the surface of Mars and compare them to theoretical predictions. The measured neutron spectrum (ranging from 8 to 740 MeV) translates into a radiation dose rate of 14±4 μ Gy/d and a dose equivalent rate of 61±15 μ Sv/d. This corresponds to 7% of the measured total surface dose rate and 10% of the biologically relevant surface dose equivalent rate on Mars. Measuring the Martian neutron and gamma spectra is an essential step for determining the mutagenic influences to past or present life at or beneath the Martian surface as well as the radiation hazard for future human exploration, including the shielding design of a potential habitat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2013je004539

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 9 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Within the given errors, the power law fit and the binwise inversion of the gamma and neutron spectra agree very well.

    “Within the given errors, the power law fit and the binwise inversion of the gamma and neutron spectrum agree very well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.
  • Findingown data

    For S_gamma = 1.43 and S_n = 0.72, the measurements in D and E can be reproduced very well.

    “For the values obtained in section 3, S 𝛾 = 1.43, S n = 0.72 (Figure A1, blue), the measurements in D and E can be reproduced very well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.
  • Findingreasoning

    The last three bins of the gamma spectrum are increased compared to the power law fit and Planetocosmics prediction.

    “However, the last three bins of the gamma spectrum are increased compared to the power law fit and Planetocosmics prediction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The Planetocosmics simulation follows the calculated gamma spectrum remarkably well.

    “The Planetocosmics simulation follows the calculated gamma spectrum remarkably well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The last bin of the neutron spectrum shows a significantly higher intensity.

    “This can be observed in the neutron spectrum, where the last bin shows a significantly higher intensity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 19
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The power law inverted spectrum explains the neutral particle measurements remarkably well, with a reduced chi2 value of 0.96 excluding high-energy bins with 0 counts.

    “Although only a simple power law was fitted, the inverted spectrum explains the measurements remarkably well.Calculating the reduced 𝜒 2 value, excluding high-energy bins with 0 counts, yields 0.96.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The power law inversion of the MSL/RAD neutral particle measurements yields spectral indices S_gamma = 1.43 and S_n = 0.72 ± 0.07.

    “For the values obtained in section 3, S 𝛾 = 1.43, S n = 0.72 (Figure A1, blue), the measurements in D and E can be reproduced very well.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The power law inversion yields intensities I_gamma = 1.6 ± 0.6 /(cm2 s MeV) and I_N = 0.08 ± 0.03 /(cm2 s MeV).

    “I 𝛾 = 1.6 ± 0.6∕(cm 2 s MeV))”
    • Also stated in: § Appendix A: Sensitivity of the Measurements to Different Input Spectra · plain
      “I N = 0.08 ± 0.03∕(cm 2 s MeV))”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For an artificial measurement based on S_gamma = 1 and S_n = 1, the measurement in E can again be explained fairly well, but the simulated measurement in D shows fewer counts at higher energies.

    “For an artificial measurement, based on to S 𝛾 = 1, S n = 1 (Figure A1, magenta), the measurement in E can again be explained fairly well, but the simulated measurement in D shows again less counts at higher energies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    If the gamma spectral index is decreased to S_gamma = 1, the measurement in D can still be reproduced fairly well, but the simulated measurement in E shows fewer counts at lower energies.

    “If instead the steepness of the gamma spectra is decreased to S 𝛾 = 1 (Figure A1, cyan), the measurement in D can still be reproduced fairly well, but the simulated measurement in E shows less counts at lower energies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    For the neutron spectrum in the energy range 8-740 MeV, the dose equivalent rate is 61 ± 2 μSv/d and the dose rate is 14 ± 1 μGy/d.

    “Calculating dose and dose equivalent for the neutron spectrum for the energies 8-740 MeV, using United States Nuclear Regulatory Comission [2009], yields Dose equivalent rate ∶= 61 ± 2 μSv/d Dose rate ∶ 14 ± 1 μGy/d”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites United States Nuclear Regulatory Comission [2009]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The reduced chi2 values for a wide range of S_gamma and S_n show a clear minimum that agrees with the values obtained in section 3.

    “Although there is a diagonal structure of small reduced 𝜒 2 values, a clear minimum, which agrees with the values obtained in section 3 can be identified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    For the Planetocosmics simulation for all neutron energies above 3 MeV, the dose rate is 16 ± 2 μGy/d and the dose equivalent is 80 ± 6 μSv/d.

    “To get an estimate of the dose rate contribution from the”
    • Also stated in: § 5. Discussion/Conclusion · plain
      “This yields a dose rate of 16±2 μGy/d and a dose equivalent of 80 ± 6 μSv/d.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Neutrons in the energy range 8-740 MeV create 7% of the total surface dose rate and 10% of the biological relevant surface dose equivalent rate on Mars.

    “Comparing the neutron induced dose with the total dose from Hassler et al. [2014] shows that the neutrons (in the energy range 8-740 MeV) create 7% of the total surface dose rate and 10% of the biological relevant surface dose equivalent rate on Mars.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hassler et al. [2014] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The neutron and gamma spectra both show small jumps at approximately 20 and 40 MeV, respectively.

    “The neutron and the gamma spectrum both show small jumps at ≈ 20 and ≈ 40 MeV, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Considering uncertainties in anticoincidence efficiency and calibration, the estimated error is ±0.16 for S_gamma and ±0.1 for S_n.

    “Considering uncertainties in AC efficiency and calibration, we estimate an error of ± 0.16 for S 𝛾 and ± 0.1 for S n .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    If the neutron spectral index is increased to S_n = 1, the measurement in E can still be explained fairly well, but the simulated measurement in D shows fewer counts than the real measurement at higher energies.

    “If the steepness of the neutron spectra is increased to S n = 1 (Figure A1, green), the measurement in E can still be explained fairly well, but the simulated measurement in D shows less counts than the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The measured neutron fluxes are larger than predicted by Planetocosmics for energies above 100 MeV but smaller for energies below 100 MeV.

    “The measured fluxes are larger than predicted by Planetocosmics for energies above 100 MeV but smaller for energies below 100 MeV.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The origin of the jump at 20 MeV can possibly be explained by GEANT4 neutron interactions switching from high-precision data to theoretical models at 20 MeV.

    “The origin of the jump at 20 MeV can possibly be explained by the GEANT4 neutron interactions, which switch from high-precision data to theoretical models at 20 MeV.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Because the MSL/RAD neutral particle measurements do not follow Poisson statistics exactly, a minimization function based on Gaussian statistics was selected.

    “However, since the MSL/RAD neutral particle measurements do not follow Poisson statistics exactly (see section 2.2), we selected a minimization function based on Gaussian statistics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Adding the 10% uncertainty for calibration values adds an uncertainty of 15% to dose and dose equivalent in the power law inversion, which is not included in the quoted values.

    “However, adding the 10% uncertainty for the calibration values, adds an uncertainty of 15% to dose and dose equivalent, which is not included in the above values.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The inversion is not dominated by any model effect because the resulting spectra are not sensitive to different GEANT4 models for high-energy neutrons.

    “However, since the resulting spectra are not sensitive to different GEANT4 models for high-energy neutrons, we do not believe that the inversion is dominated by any model effect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The neutron spectrum at the Martian surface can be thought of as consisting of neutrons with a very broad energy range coming from above and comparatively low-energy neutrons coming from below.

    “Thus, the neutron spectrum at the surface can be thought of as consisting of neutrons with a very broad energy range coming from above and comparatively low-energy neutrons coming from below.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The jumps at 40 MeV may be caused by the geometry of the E detector, which contains recoil protons created by neutrons up to 40 MeV for vertical or near-vertical trajectories.

    “The jumps at 40 MeV may be caused by the geometry of the E detector, which contains the recoil protons, created by neutrons, up to 40 MeV for vertical or near-vertical trajectories.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The event selection approach throws away exactly half the valid neutral particle events, and this method minimizes contamination of the measurement with charged particles.

    “Using this approach means that we throw away exactly half the valid neutral particle events.This method has the advantage that the contamination of the measurement with charged particles is minimized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The errors represent uncertainties due to measurement statistics and the ill-posed nature of the inversion problem, but they do not represent uncertainties in the detector response function or calibration.

    “This means that the errors represent the uncertainties due to the statistics of the measurement and the uncertainties introduced by the ill-posed nature of the inversion problem, but they do not represent the uncertainties in the DRF or the calibration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
21 of 21
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the relevant energy range, the Martian gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.

    “In the relevant energy range, the gamma and neutron spectra can be approximated by power laws.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The approximately 10% difference between B and E dose rates is expected from the different detector responses to energetic charged particles, with a small additional neutron contribution to the E dose rate.

    “The ~ 10% difference in dose rates is expected based on the different responses of the detectors to energetic charged particles.; there is also a small contribution to the E dose rate from high-energy neutrons (E > 6 MeV), on the order of a few percent of the total during solar quiet time (Köhler et al., 2014).”

    From Analysis of the radiation hazard observed by RAD on the surface of Mars during the September 2017 solar particle event (2018) · cites this paper as Köhler et al., 2014

    Section 2.1 says neutrons can deposit energy in detector E, and section 5 reports that 8–740 MeV neutrons account for 7% of the total Martian surface dose rate. The paper does not establish that neutrons above 6 MeV contribute a few percent specifically to E’s dose rate during solar-quiet time, or explain an approximately 10% difference between B and E dose rates by their responses to energetic charged particles. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Response-matrix dimensions are reversed

    Minor

    The vector definitions give each detector measurement k elements and each particle spectrum l elements. A matrix mapping a spectrum to a detector measurement must therefore be k × l, not l × k.

  • Two values are given for the fitted gamma spectral index

    Minor

    The appendix identifies 1.43 as the gamma index obtained in section 3, but the Figure A1 caption identifies the power-law inversion result as 1.41. The stated values differ at the printed precision.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Köhler J.(2012) Gamma/neutron separation in the Martian radiation environment dissertation PhD thesis Christian‐Albrechts‐Universität zu Kiel.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Köhler, J., Zeitlin, C., Ehresmann, B., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., Hassler, D. M., Reitz, G., Brinza, D. E., Weigle, G., Appel, J., Böttcher, S., Böhm, E., Burmeister, S., Guo, J., Martin, C., Posner, A., Rafkin, S., & Kortmann, O.
Affiliations
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Southwest Research Institute (US)
  • Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel Germany
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
  • Big Head Endian LLC Burden Kansas USA
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
  • Space Sciences Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Köhler, J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2014-03
Volume
119
Issue
3
Pages
594-603
ISSN
  • 2169-9097 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-9100
OpenAlex
W2015527110
Cited by
71
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1273039)
  • Southwest Research Institute
  • Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
neutron energy spectrum, Mars Science Laboratory, Curiosity rover, Radiation Assessment Detector, maximum likelihood inversion, radiation dose rate, dose equivalent rate, Mars habitability, radiation shielding design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review