Cited by 31Bacterial Infections and VaccinesSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Capacidad de la procalcitonina para predecir meningitis bacterianas en el servicio de urgencias

Open access
Morales Casado, M.I., Moreno Alonso, F., Juárez Belaunde, A.L., Heredero Gálvez, E., Talavera Encinas, O., Julián-Jiménez, A.·2016·Neurología

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to analyse and compare procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as tools for detecting bacterial meningitis and predicting bacteraemia.Methods Prospective, observational, and descriptive analytical study of 98 consecutive patients aged ≥15 years and diagnosed with acute meningitis in an emergency department between August 2009 and July 2013.Results We analysed 98 patients with AM (66 males [67%]); mean age was 44±21 years. The diagnosis was bacterial meningitis in 38 patients (20 with bacteraemia); viral meningitis in 33; probable viral meningitis in 15; and presumptively diagnosed partially treated acute meningitis in 12. PCT had the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) (0.996; 95% CI, 0.987-1; p<0.001). With a cutoff of ≥ 0.74 ng/ml, PCT achieved 94.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.9%, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%. The mean levels for PCT were11.47±7.76 ng/ml in bacterial meningitis vs. 0.10±0.15 ng/ml in viral meningitis (p <0.001). The AUC for CRP was 0.916 and a cutoff of ≥ 90 mg/L achieved 67.5% sensitivity, 86.3% specificity, PPV of 89.2%, and NPV of 90.4%. As a predictor of bacteraemia in bacterial meningitis, only PCT delivered a significant difference (14.7±7.1 ng/mL vs. 4.68±3.54 ng/mL, p<0.001). A cutoff of ≥ 1.1 ng/mL achieved 94.6% sensitivity, 72.4% specificity, NPV of 95.4%, and PPV of 69.2%; the AUC was 0.965 (95% CI, 0.921-1; p<0.001).Conclusions PCT has a high diagnostic power for acute meningitis in emergency department patients. PCT outperforms CRP in the detection of bacterial aetiology and is a good predictor of bacteraemia in bacterial meningitis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nrl.2014.07.003

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serum procalcitonin measurement has been reported to have a sensitivity of ∼95% and a specificity of ∼100% in distinguishing bacterial from viral meningitis in adults.

    “The use of serum procalcitonin measurement remains limited due to cost but where available has been reported to have a sensitivity of ∼95% and a specificity of ∼100% in distinguishing bacterial from viral meningitis in adults.45”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mills GD, Lala HM, Oehley MR, Craig AB, Barrat K, Hood D, et al. Elevated procalcitonina as a diagnostic marker in meningococ- cal disease. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25:501-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morales Casado, M. I., Moreno Alonso, F., Juárez Belaunde, A. L., Heredero Gálvez, E., Talavera Encinas, O., & Julián-Jiménez, A.
Affiliations
Hospital Virgen de la Salud (ES)
Corresponding author
Julián-Jiménez, A.
Venue
Neurología
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
9-17
ISSN
0213-4853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979070476
Cited by
31
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Neurología (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
bacterial meningitis, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, bacteremia, acute meningitis, viral meningitis, diagnostic accuracy, emergency department, biomarkers, receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity and specificity, adults, meningococcal meningitis, Haemophilus influenzae type b
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, C-Reactive Protein, Calcitonin, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Meningitis, Bacterial, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review