The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the conclusions that can be drawn from the data taken thus far with the PHOBOS detector at RHIC. In the most central Au+Au collisions at the highest beam energy, evidence is found for the formation of a very high energy density system whose description in terms of simple hadronic degrees of freedom is inappropriate. Furthermore, the constituents of this novel system are found to undergo a significant level of interaction. The properties of particle production at RHIC energies are shown to follow a number of simple scaling behaviors, some of which continue trends found at lower energies or in simpler systems. As a function of centrality, the total number of charged particles scales with the number of participating nucleons. When comparing Au+Au at different centralities, the dependence of the yield on the number of participants at higher p T (∼4 GeV/c) is very similar to that at low transverse momentum. The measured values of charged particle pseudorapidity density and elliptic flow were found to be independent of energy over a broad range of pseudorapidities when effectively viewed in the rest frame of one of the colliding nuclei, a property we describe as “extended longitudinal scaling”. Finally, the centrality and energy dependences of several observables were found to factorize to a surprising degree.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adcox, K., Adler, S. S., Afanasiev, S., Aidala, C., Ajitanand, N. N., Akiba, Y., Al-Jamel, A., Alexander, J., Amirikas, R., Aoki, K., et al. (2005) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.086 · Cited by 3,025
Self-citationHighly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: The central rapidity region
Bjorken, J. D. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.140 · Cited by 2,796
Remarks on the chiral phase transition in chromodynamics
Pisarski, R. D., & Wilczek, F. (1984) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.29.338 · Cited by 1,252
L ATTICE QCD AT F INITE T EMPERATURE
Laermann, E., & Philipsen, O. (2003) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.53.041002.110609 · Cited by 240
QCD thermodynamics with three flavors of improved staggered quarks
Bernard, C., Burch, T., DeTar, C., Osborn, J., Gottlieb, S., Gregory, E. B., Toussaint, D., Heller, U. M., & Sugar, R. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.034504 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Larkoski, A. J., Moult, I., & Nachman, B. (2020) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.11.001 · Cited by 361
Balasubramanian, V., Bernamonti, A., de Boer, J., Copland, N., Craps, B., Keski-Vakkuri, E., Müller, B., Schäfer, A., Shigemori, M., & Staessens, W. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.026010 · Cited by 281
The quest for the quark–gluon plasma
Braun-Munzinger, P., & Stachel, J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06080 · Cited by 254
Collective Non-Abelian Instabilities in a Melting Color Glass Condensate
Romatschke, P., & Venugopalan, R. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.062302 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Back, B. B., Baker, M. D., Ballintijn, M., Barton, D. S., Becker, B., Betts, R. R., Bickley, A. A., Bindel, R., Budzanowski, A., Busza, W., Carroll, A., Chai, Z., Decowski, M. P., García, E., Gburek, T., George, N. K., Gulbrandsen, K., Gushue, S., Halliwell, C., Hamblen, J., Harrington, A. S., Hauer, M., Heintzelman, G. A., Henderson, C., Hofman, D. J., Hollis, R. S., Hołyński, R., Holzman, B., Iordanova, A., Johnson, E., Kane, J. L., Katzy, J., Khan, N., Kucewicz, W., Kulinich, P., Kuo, C. M., Lee, J. W., Lin, W. T., Manly, S., McLeod, D., Mignerey, A. C., Nouicer, R., Olszewski, A., Pak, R., Park, I. C., Pernegger, H., Reed, C., Remsberg, L. P., Reuter, M., Roland, C., Roland, G., Rosenberg, L., Sagerer, J., Sarin, P., Sawicki, P., Seals, H., Sedykh, I., Skulski, W., Smith, C. E., Stankiewicz, M. A., Steinberg, P., Stephans, G. S. F., Sukhanov, A., Tang, J.-L., Tonjes, M. B., Trzupek, A., Vale, C. M., van Nieuwenhuizen, G. J., Vaurynovich, S. S., Verdier, R., Veres, G. I., Wenger, E., Wolfs, F. L. H., Wosiek, B., Woźniak, K., Wuosmaa, A. H., Wysłouch, B., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 757
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 28-101
- ISSN
- 0375-9474 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2297591535
- Cited by
- 2,238
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 69.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.084
- The paper
- Back, B. B., Baker, M. D., Ballintijn, M., Barton, D. S., Becker, B., Betts, R. R., Bickley, A. A., Bindel, R., Budzanowski, A., Busza, W., Carroll, A., Chai, Z., Decowski, M. P., García, E., Gburek, T., George, N. K., Gulbrandsen, K., Gushue, S., Halliwell, C., . . . Zhang, J. (2005). The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC. Nuclear Physics A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.