The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aspects of Split Supersymmetry
Open accessAbstract
We explore some fundamental differences in the phenomenology, cosmology and model building of Split Supersymmetry compared with traditional low-scale supersymmetry. We show how the mass spectrum of Split Supersymmetry naturally emerges from theories where the dominant source of supersymmetry breaking preserves an R symmetry, characterize the class of theories where the unavoidable R-breaking by gravity can be neglected, and point out a new possibility, where supersymmetry breaking is directly communicated at tree level to the visible sector via renormalizable interactions. Next, we discuss possible low-energy signals for Split Supersymmetry. The absence of new light scalars removes all the phenomenological difficulties of low-energy supersymmetry, associated with one-loop flavor and CP violating effects. However, the electric dipole moments of leptons and quarks do arise at two loops, and are automatically at the level of present limits with no need for small phases, making them accessible to several ongoing new-generation experiments. We also study proton decay in the context of Split Supersymmetry, and point out scenarios where the dimension-six induced decays may be observable. Finally, we show that the novel spectrum of Split Supersymmetry opens up new possibilities for the generation of dark matter, as the decays of ultraheavy gravitinos in the early universe typically increase the abundance of the lightest neutralino above its usual freeze-out value. This allows for lighter gauginos and Higgsinos, more accessible both to the LHC and to dark-matter detection experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
de Sitter vacua in string theory
Kachru, S., Kallosh, R., Linde, A., & Trivedi, S. P. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.68.046005 · Cited by 3,321
Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5)
Dimopoulos, S., & Georgi, H. (1981) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90522-8 · Cited by 2,227
Self-citationQuantization of four-form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant
Bousso, R., & Polchinski, J. (2000) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/06/006 · Cited by 1,495
Out of this world supersymmetry breaking
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00359-4 · Cited by 1,446
Theories with gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking
Giudice, G. F., & Rattazzi, R. (1999) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00042-3 · Cited by 1,391
Self-citationHierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications
Giddings, S. B., Kachru, S., & Polchinski, J. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.106006 · Cited by 1,328
Giudice, G. F., Rattazzi, R., Luty, M. A., & Murayama, H. (1998) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/12/027 · Cited by 1,299
Self-citationGrand unified theories and proton decay
Langacker, P. (1981) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(81)90059-4 · Cited by 1,285
Constraint on the Photino Mass from Cosmology
Goldberg, H. (1983) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.50.1419 · Cited by 1,210
Cited by
Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO
Degrassi, G., Di Vita, S., Elias-Miró, J., Espinosa, J. R., Giudice, G. F., Isidori, G., & Strumia, A. (2012) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2012)098 · Cited by 1,524
Self-citationDouglas, M. R., & Kachru, S. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.733 · Cited by 1,122
Linde, A. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74353-8_1 · Cited by 486
Long-lived particles at the energy frontier: the MATHUSLA physics case
Curtin, D., Drewes, M., McCullough, M., Meade, P., Mohapatra, R. N., Shelton, J., Shuve, B., Accomando, E., Alpigiani, C., Antusch, S., et al. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab28d6 · Cited by 384
Self-citationDietrich, D. D., Sannino, F., & Tuominen, K. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.055001 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Arkani-Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., Giudice, G. F., & Romanino, A.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 709
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 3-46
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037228718
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 29.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspects of Split Supersymmetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.12.026
- The paper
- Arkani-Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., Giudice, G. F., & Romanino, A. (2005). Aspects of Split Supersymmetry. Nuclear Physics B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.12.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.