Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 10Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 45 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Fueling for and recovering from resistance training: The periworkout nutrition practices of competitive powerlifters

Open access
King, Andrew, Kwan, Kedric, Jukic, Ivan, Zinn, Caryn, Helms, Eric·2024·Nutrition

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nutrient timing is a concept that emphasizes the intentional ingestion of whole or fortified foods, and dietary supplements, to adequately fuel for, and recover from, acute and chronic exercise. The nutrition strategies used by powerlifters around training sessions have not, to our knowledge, been previously investigated. This study explored the self-reported periworkout (before, during, and after) nutrition practices of competitive powerlifters, including what, why, and information source that informed practice, with comparison to current sport nutrition guidelines. METHODS: Actively competing male (n = 240) and female (n = 65) powerlifters completed a cross-sectional online survey of self-reported periworkout nutrition practices in the pre-, intra-, and postexercise periods, fasted training, and supplementation. Data are presented as the number (n) and percentage (%) of all powerlifters practicing a given strategy followed by a % of responses reporting various practices or beliefs within this strategy. Categorical subgroups (sex, age, and weight class; and competitive caliber) were analyzed with a chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and denoted where significant (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Most powerlifters reported paying specific attention to nutrition practices in the pre-exercise period (n = 261; 85.6%) by ingesting more carbohydrate (CHO) rich foods (n = 234; 89.6%) for the purpose of assisting in training performance (n = 222; 85.1%). Most powerlifters reported intraexercise nutrition strategies (n = 211; 69.2%), of which most included ingesting more CHO rich foods (n = 159; 74.5%) for the purpose of feeling less hungry and/or boosting energy levels during training (n = 129; 61.1%). Most powerlifters reported paying attention to postexercise nutrition (n = 244; 80%), by ingesting more protein rich foods (n = 182; 74.6%) for the purpose of recovering better for the whole day (n = 152; 62.3%) and enhancing the benefits of training (n = 149; 61.1%). Most powerlifters did not complete training sessions in the fasted state (n = 262; 85.9%). Most powerlifters reported paying attention to supplementation before training (n = 237; 77.7%), of which preworkout formulas (n = 137; 57.8%), energy drinks (n = 101; 42.6%), creatine (n = 88; 37.1%), and caffeine pills (n = 70; 29.5%) were most reported. Supplementation was used to assist in training performance (n = 197; 83.1%) and increase wakefulness/alertness (n = 183; 77.2%). Males reported more often than females that they informed multiple elements of their nutrition practices with the information they read or watched somewhere (P = 0.002-0.012). CONCLUSION: The periworkout nutrition practices used by competitive powerlifters followed current sport nutrition guidelines, by using CHO sources to fuel for training and ensuring the provision of protein postexercise. Competitive powerlifters may wish to exert caution with supplementation, as there is a risk of harm or inadvertent doping.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

In a cross-sectional survey of 305 competitive powerlifters, most reported periworkout nutrition practices consistent with current sport nutrition guidelines, emphasizing carbohydrate before/during training and protein after training. Supplementation before training was common, most often caffeine-containing products and creatine, with authors cautioning about contamination and inadvertent doping risk.

Key findings

  • Pre- and intraexercise: 85.6% (n = 261) paid attention to fueling 1–4 h before key sessions; 89.6% (n = 234) ate more CHO-rich foods, and 85.1% (n = 222) did so to assist training performance. 69.2% (n = 211) used intraexercise nutrition; 74.5% (n = 159) chose CHO-rich foods, and 61.1% (n = 112) reported the purpose as feeling less hungry and/or boosting energy.
  • Postexercise and fasting: 80% (n = 244) paid attention to postexercise nutrition; 74.6% (n = 182) chose protein-rich foods, with 62.3% (n = 152) reporting “recovering better for the whole day” and 61.1% (n = 149) “enhancing the benefits of training.” 85.9% (n = 262) did not complete training fasted; among the 14.1% (n = 43) who did, 81.4% (n = 35) trained after an overnight fast and 86% (n = 36) cited convenience.
  • Supplementation: 77.7% (n = 237) paid attention to supplementation in the 2 h before training; preworkout formulas (57.8%, n = 137), energy drinks (42.6%, n = 101), creatine (37.1%, n = 88), and caffeine pills (29.5%, n = 70) were most reported. Reasons included assisting training performance (83.1%, n = 197) and increasing wakefulness/alertness (77.2%, n = 183). Males more often than females informed multiple nutrition practices from reading/watching something (P = 0.002–0.012).

Methods

  • Anonymous international cross-sectional online survey (Qualtrics) distributed via social media from November 2020 to February 2021. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 y and competing in a drug-free sanctioned powerlifting competition within the previous 18 months; 305 actively competing powerlifters (240 male, 65 female) were analyzed, with only fully completed questionnaires included.
  • The questionnaire had ten sections; the last five covered pre-exercise nutrition, postexercise nutrition, fasted training, intraexercise nutrition, and supplementation practices. Definitions were provided for concepts such as hard/easier/key training sessions, fueling, and fasting.
  • Descriptive data were presented as n and %; categorical subgroups were analyzed with chi-square or Fisher’s exact test and Cramer’s V, with significance set at P < 0.05. Weight-class follow-up used Holm-Bonferroni correction where significant; analyses used SPSS v27 and R v4.2.2, and data/code are available on OSF.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: self-reported nutrition practices may be subject to recall errors and participant bias; reliability could not be assessed because the survey was anonymous. Not all questionnaire terms were defined (e.g., supplementation, fasting), and quantities for food categories were not defined.
  • Stated in the paper: participants had to be ≥18 y, excluding subjunior powerlifters aged 14–17 y; most respondents (84%) resided in North America and Europe, limiting generalizability; the sample was convenience-based and analyses were descriptive/exploratory rather than confirmatory. Only 21% (n = 65) were female, so sex and weight-class subgroup analyses may be spurious or of limited practical significance.
  • Evident from the design: the cross-sectional survey cannot establish causality or track changes over time, and the convenience/social-media recruitment limits generalizability beyond the sampled respondents.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nut.2024.112389

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 1 Descriptive participant characteristics of (A) age class, (B) competitive caliber, (C) resistance training experience in years, (D), powerlifting speci fi c experience in years, (E) International Powerlifting Federation (IPF) points based on best total in competition, and (F) participants location. For (F), participants were from 47 countries, which were grouped by continent.
Figure 1 Descriptive participant characteristics of (A) age class, (B) competitive caliber, (C) resistance training experience in years, (D), powerlifting speci fi c experience in years, (E) International Powerlifting Federation (IPF) points based on best total in competition, and (F) participants location. For (F), participants were from 47 countries, which were grouped by continent.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Q1: Pre-exercise nutrition practices of 305 actively competing powerlifters. The prevalence of reported speci fi c attention being paid to fueling in the 1 to 4 h before a key training session, and the reason for following this practice. Percentages (%) are presented as the proportion of all participants that chose a speci fi c answer (YES/NO), followed by a % of responses reporting various practices and reasons within these strategies. Number ( n ) of participants has been provided. Answer boxes and circles are color coded based on the % of responses:  60%, black box with white font; 40 to 59%, dark grey box with white font; 20 to 39%, light grey with black font; < 20%, white box with black font. Symbols are used to indicate statistical signi fi cance from chi-square (or Fisher ' s Exact) test between subgroups for sex (vector sex symbol), age class (human life cycle symbol), weight class (weight scale symbol), and International Powerlifting Federation (IPF) points (IPF symbol). Where signi fi cant differences were detected, the direction of difference is indicated in the corresponding box/circle (e.g., males reported more often than females would be indicated by M > F).
Figure 2 Q1: Pre-exercise nutrition practices of 305 actively competing powerlifters. The prevalence of reported speci fi c attention being paid to fueling in the 1 to 4 h before a key training session, and the reason for following this practice. Percentages (%) are presented as the proportion of all participants that chose a speci fi c answer (YES/NO), followed by a % of responses reporting various practices and reasons within these strategies. Number ( n ) of participants has been provided. Answer boxes and circles are color coded based on the % of responses:  60%, black box with white font; 40 to 59%, dark grey box with white font; 20 to 39%, light grey with black font; < 20%, white box with black font. Symbols are used to indicate statistical signi fi cance from chi-square (or Fisher ' s Exact) test between subgroups for sex (vector sex symbol), age class (human life cycle symbol), weight class (weight scale symbol), and International Powerlifting Federation (IPF) points (IPF symbol). Where signi fi cant differences were detected, the direction of difference is indicated in the corresponding box/circle (e.g., males reported more often than females would be indicated by M > F).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Q2: Intraexercise nutrition practices of 305 actively competing powerlifters. The prevalence of consuming food and/or calorie containing drinks during training sessions (YES/NO), followed by the type of training session, what is consumed, and the reason for this practice. Description of how to interpret is in the Figure 2 caption.
Figure 3 Q2: Intraexercise nutrition practices of 305 actively competing powerlifters. The prevalence of consuming food and/or calorie containing drinks during training sessions (YES/NO), followed by the type of training session, what is consumed, and the reason for this practice. Description of how to interpret is in the Figure 2 caption.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Q3: Postexercise nutrition practices of 305 actively competing powerlifters. The prevalence of reported speci fi c attention being paid to nutrition after a key training session (within 3 h) (YES/NO), followed by what foods or calorie containing drinks are consumed, and the reasons for following this practice. Description of how to interpret is in the Figure 2 caption.
Figure 4 Q3: Postexercise nutrition practices of 305 actively competing powerlifters. The prevalence of reported speci fi c attention being paid to nutrition after a key training session (within 3 h) (YES/NO), followed by what foods or calorie containing drinks are consumed, and the reasons for following this practice. Description of how to interpret is in the Figure 2 caption.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Q4: Fasted training nutrition practices of 305 actively competing powerlifters. The prevalence of reported intentional fasted training (YES/NO), and the reasons for following this practice. Description of how to interpret is in the Figure 2 caption.
Figure 5 Q4: Fasted training nutrition practices of 305 actively competing powerlifters. The prevalence of reported intentional fasted training (YES/NO), and the reasons for following this practice. Description of how to interpret is in the Figure 2 caption.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 Q5: Pre-exercise supplementation practices of 305 actively competing powerlifters. The prevalence of reported speci fi c attention to pre-exercise supplementation (YES/NO), followed by which training session, what type of supplement, and the reasons for following this practice. Description of how to interpret is in the Figure 2 caption.
Figure 6 Q5: Pre-exercise supplementation practices of 305 actively competing powerlifters. The prevalence of reported speci fi c attention to pre-exercise supplementation (YES/NO), followed by which training session, what type of supplement, and the reasons for following this practice. Description of how to interpret is in the Figure 2 caption.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 33 Not checked · 102 Own results and interpretations

88 more claims

Create a free account to see all 135 claims and to verify the 40 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 23
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 31
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
King, A., Kwan, K., Jukic, I., Zinn, C., & Helms, E.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
King, Andrew
Venue
Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
122
Pages
112389
ISSN
0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391617268
Cited by
10
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
powerlifters, nutrient timing, pre-exercise nutrition, post-exercise nutrition, carbohydrate intake, protein intake, dietary supplements, nutrition information sources, competitive athletes, sex differences, weight class, training recovery, training performance
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Exercise, Dietary Supplements, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.