Cited by 18Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentBariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Obesity Pillars roundtable: Excessive weight reduction with highly effective anti-obesity medications (heAOMs)

Open access

Abstract

Background: Historically, many anti-obesity medications (AOMs) were withdrawn from development and/or the market due to safety concerns. Another challenge was that, with some exceptions, most of these AOMs had limited weight reducing efficacy. Approved AOMs often did not meet the weight reduction expectations of either clinicians, or their patients. Currently, newer approved and investigational AOMs achieve greater weight reduction than older AOMs. This has prompted an emerging new challenge of "too much weight loss" with some of these highly effective anti-obesity medications (heAOM) - something many did not think possible prior to year 2020. Methods: This roundtable review includes perspectives from 3 obesity specialists with experience in the clinical use of AOMs. The intent is to provide perspectives and guidance in managing patients with obesity who experience "too much weight loss" with heAOM. Results: The panelists generally agreed that before treatment with heAOMs, patients with obesity are best informed about the importance of healthful nutrition, adequate hydration, routine physical activity, behavior modification techniques, goals of treatment, and anticipated changes not only from a medical standpoint, but also from a psychosocial standpoint. Clinicians might best recognize that the definition of "excessive weight reduction" may have both objective and subjective considerations, with body composition analyses often essential to accurately assess adiposity. Conclusions: The consensus of the panelists is reflected in a proposed structured and algorithmic approach to the patient with excessive weight reduction. Once properly evaluated, if the excessive weight reduction is determined most likely due to the heAOM hyper-responders, then this should prompt the clinician to educate the patient (and possibly family and friends) on the health and psychosocial aspects of weight reduction, and engage in a shared decision-making process that determines if the heAOM is best kept at the same dose, decreased in dose, temporarily held, or rare cases, best discontinued.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100039

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In STEP-1, mean change in body weight was -14.9% with semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly versus -2.4% with placebo at 68 weeks.

    “In the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity (STEP)-1 randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.govidentifier: NCT03548935) of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, mean change in body weight was À14.9% in patients treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly compared with À2.4% in placebo-treated control individuals at 68 weeks of treatment [22].”

    From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Historic perspective section (page unavailable) associates semaglutide’s approval with mean weight reductions often reaching 15–20%. It does not give the STEP-1 result of −14.9%, the placebo result of −2.4%, the 2.4 mg weekly dose, or the 68-week endpoint; searches for those details found no matching passage. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The most common adverse events associated with semaglutide and tirzepatide treatment include gastrointestinal events such as nausea, diarrhea, and constipation.

    “The most common adverse events associated with semaglutide and tirzepatide treatment include gastrointestinal events such as nausea, diarrhea, and constipation [22,25].”

    From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The section “Approach to the patient with obesity experiencing substantial weight reduction with heAOMs” (page unavailable) describes nausea and vomiting as side effects in one patient taking a highly effective anti-obesity medication. It does not identify that medication as semaglutide or tirzepatide, establish which adverse events are most common, or describe diarrhea and constipation as treatment-related events; its table lists chronic diarrhea as a possible cause of weight loss instead. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Therapy with AOMs that activate the GLP-1 receptor (such as liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide) is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and constipation.

    “Therapy with AOMs that activate the GLP-1 receptor (such as liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide) is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and constipation.”

    From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The section “Approach to the patient with obesity experiencing substantial weight reduction with heAOMs” describes a patient whose nausea and vomiting were side effects of heAOM therapy. It does not establish an increased risk for GLP-1–activating AOMs as a group or link diarrhea, dyspepsia, and constipation to those drugs; its table lists chronic diarrhea as a possible cause of weight loss, not a drug adverse event. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In rare cases, patients treated with AOMs may experience excessive weight loss.

    “In rare cases, patients treated with AOMs may experience excessive weight loss [18].”

    From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [18]

    The section on managing substantial weight reduction with heAOMs discusses patients whose weight loss may be excessive, supporting that it can occur during treatment. The passages do not establish how often it occurs, so the qualifier “rare” is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recently approved and emerging antiobesity medications (AOMs) result in an average weight reduction of ≥15%.

    “Since 2021, a new generation of AOMs has emerged, offering improved efficacy, including a mean weight reduction of approximately 15% or more [18]”

    From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 18

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Bays, 2022, Anti-obesity medications and investigational agents: an obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars
  2. Hollander, 2017, Coadministration of canagliflozin and phentermine for weight management in overweight and obese individuals without diabetes: a randomized clinical trial, Diabetes Care, 40, 632, 10.2337/dc16-2427 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Aronne, 2013, Evaluation of phentermine and topiramate versus phentermine/topiramate extended-release in obese adults, Obesity, 21, 2163, 10.1002/oby.20584 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Wilding, 2021, Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity, N Engl J Med, 384, 989, 10.1056/NEJMoa2032183 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Pi-Sunyer, 2015, A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management, N Engl J Med, 373, 11, 10.1056/NEJMoa1411892 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Garvey, 2012, Two-year sustained weight loss and metabolic benefits with controlled-release phentermine/topiramate in obese and overweight adults (SEQUEL): a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 extension study, Am J Clin Nutr, 95, 297, 10.3945/ajcn.111.024927 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Apovian, 2013, A randomized, phase 3 trial of naltrexone SR/bupropion SR on weight and obesity-related risk factors (COR-II), Obesity, 21, 935, 10.1002/oby.20309 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Greenway, 2019, A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of Gelesis100: a novel nonsystemic oral hydrogel for weight loss, Obesity, 27, 205, 10.1002/oby.22347 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bays, 2022, Thirty obesity myths, misunderstandings, and/or oversimplifications: an obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars, 3, 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100034 · DOI · Paper page
  10. DeJesus, 2019, Experience and expectations of patients on weight loss: the learning health system network experience, Obesity Science & Practice, 5, 479, 10.1002/osp4.364 · DOI
  11. Fitch, 2022, Obesity definition, diagnosis, bias, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and telehealth: an Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars, 1, 10.1016/j.obpill.2021.100004 · DOI
  12. Freshwater, 2022, Behavior, motivational interviewing, eating disorders, and obesity management technologies: an Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars, 2, 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100014 · DOI
  13. Song, 2008, Association between support group attendance and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Surg Obes Relat Dis, 4, 100, 10.1016/j.soard.2007.02.010 · DOI
  14. Kaiser, 2011, Positive relationship between support group attendance and one-year postoperative weight loss in gastric banding patients, Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery, 7 1, 89, 10.1016/j.soard.2010.07.013 · DOI
  15. Lazarus, 2022, Cancer and obesity: an obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars, 3, 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100026 · DOI
  16. Álvaro Sanz, 2021, Impact of weight loss on cancer patients' quality of life at the beginning of the chemotherapy, Support Care Cancer, 29, 627
  17. Tondt, 2022, Concomitant medications, functional foods, and supplements: an obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars, 2, 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100017 · DOI
  18. Alibhai, 2005, An approach to the management of unintentional weight loss in elderly people, CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J) : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 172, 773, 10.1503/cmaj.1031527 · DOI
  19. Shelton, 2011, Inflammation in depression: is adiposity a cause?, Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 13, 41, 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.1/rshelton · DOI
  20. McKay, 2021, Plasma levels of ghrelin and GLP-1, but not leptin or amylin, respond to a psychosocial stressor in women and men, Horm Behav, 134, 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2021.105017 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Bays, H. E., Burridge, K., Richards, J., & Fitch, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Bays, Harold Edward
Venue
Obesity Pillars
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
4
Pages
100039
ISSN
2667-3681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307646080
Cited by
18
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Pillars (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
anti-obesity drugs, excessive weight loss, hyper-responders, obesity treatment, body composition assessment, shared decision-making, medication dose adjustment, patient education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review