The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Obesity Pillars roundtable: Excessive weight reduction with highly effective anti-obesity medications (heAOMs)
Open accessAbstract
Background: Historically, many anti-obesity medications (AOMs) were withdrawn from development and/or the market due to safety concerns. Another challenge was that, with some exceptions, most of these AOMs had limited weight reducing efficacy. Approved AOMs often did not meet the weight reduction expectations of either clinicians, or their patients. Currently, newer approved and investigational AOMs achieve greater weight reduction than older AOMs. This has prompted an emerging new challenge of "too much weight loss" with some of these highly effective anti-obesity medications (heAOM) - something many did not think possible prior to year 2020. Methods: This roundtable review includes perspectives from 3 obesity specialists with experience in the clinical use of AOMs. The intent is to provide perspectives and guidance in managing patients with obesity who experience "too much weight loss" with heAOM. Results: The panelists generally agreed that before treatment with heAOMs, patients with obesity are best informed about the importance of healthful nutrition, adequate hydration, routine physical activity, behavior modification techniques, goals of treatment, and anticipated changes not only from a medical standpoint, but also from a psychosocial standpoint. Clinicians might best recognize that the definition of "excessive weight reduction" may have both objective and subjective considerations, with body composition analyses often essential to accurately assess adiposity. Conclusions: The consensus of the panelists is reflected in a proposed structured and algorithmic approach to the patient with excessive weight reduction. Once properly evaluated, if the excessive weight reduction is determined most likely due to the heAOM hyper-responders, then this should prompt the clinician to educate the patient (and possibly family and friends) on the health and psychosocial aspects of weight reduction, and engage in a shared decision-making process that determines if the heAOM is best kept at the same dose, decreased in dose, temporarily held, or rare cases, best discontinued.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In STEP-1, mean change in body weight was -14.9% with semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly versus -2.4% with placebo at 68 weeks.
“In the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity (STEP)-1 randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.govidentifier: NCT03548935) of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, mean change in body weight was À14.9% in patients treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly compared with À2.4% in placebo-treated control individuals at 68 weeks of treatment [22].”
From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The Historic perspective section (page unavailable) associates semaglutide’s approval with mean weight reductions often reaching 15–20%. It does not give the STEP-1 result of −14.9%, the placebo result of −2.4%, the 2.4 mg weekly dose, or the 68-week endpoint; searches for those details found no matching passage. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe most common adverse events associated with semaglutide and tirzepatide treatment include gastrointestinal events such as nausea, diarrhea, and constipation.
“The most common adverse events associated with semaglutide and tirzepatide treatment include gastrointestinal events such as nausea, diarrhea, and constipation [22,25].”
From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The section “Approach to the patient with obesity experiencing substantial weight reduction with heAOMs” (page unavailable) describes nausea and vomiting as side effects in one patient taking a highly effective anti-obesity medication. It does not identify that medication as semaglutide or tirzepatide, establish which adverse events are most common, or describe diarrhea and constipation as treatment-related events; its table lists chronic diarrhea as a possible cause of weight loss instead. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTherapy with AOMs that activate the GLP-1 receptor (such as liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide) is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and constipation.
“Therapy with AOMs that activate the GLP-1 receptor (such as liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide) is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and constipation.”
From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The section “Approach to the patient with obesity experiencing substantial weight reduction with heAOMs” describes a patient whose nausea and vomiting were side effects of heAOM therapy. It does not establish an increased risk for GLP-1–activating AOMs as a group or link diarrhea, dyspepsia, and constipation to those drugs; its table lists chronic diarrhea as a possible cause of weight loss, not a drug adverse event. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn rare cases, patients treated with AOMs may experience excessive weight loss.
“In rare cases, patients treated with AOMs may experience excessive weight loss [18].”
From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The section on managing substantial weight reduction with heAOMs discusses patients whose weight loss may be excessive, supporting that it can occur during treatment. The passages do not establish how often it occurs, so the qualifier “rare” is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRecently approved and emerging antiobesity medications (AOMs) result in an average weight reduction of ≥15%.
“Since 2021, a new generation of AOMs has emerged, offering improved efficacy, including a mean weight reduction of approximately 15% or more [18]”
From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
Patients who achieve significant weight reduction may experience unexpected changes in the dynamics of their relationships with others, which can sometimes be distressing.
“Patients who achieve significant weight reduction may experience unexpected changes in the dynamics of their relationships with others, which can sometimes be distressing [18].”
From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
Improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors including waist circumference and systolic blood pressure, and patient-reported physical function have been observed with semaglutide treatment.
“Improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors, including waist circumference and systolic blood pressure, and patientreported physical function have also been observed with semaglutide treatment [22,23].”
From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The Historic perspective section discusses semaglutide for weight reduction and mentions potential cardiovascular benefits, but does not report changes in waist circumference or systolic blood pressure. Searches for those measures and for patient-reported physical function found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed outcomes; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn STEP-1, weight reduction of ≥15% was achieved by 50.5% of participants at 68 weeks.
“Weight reduction of ≥15% was achieved by 50.5% of participants at 68 weeks [22].”
From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The supplied passage on excessive weight reduction does not report STEP-1 outcomes. The References section lists a semaglutide trial, but searches of our copy for 50.5%, ≥15% weight loss, and 68 weeks found no passage reporting the claimed result. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn registration trials, most gastrointestinal events were mild or moderate and generally transient, infrequently leading to treatment discontinuation.
“In registration trials, most events were mild or moderate and generally transient, infrequently leading to treatment discontinuation [22,25].”
From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The section “Approach to the patient with obesity experiencing substantial weight reduction with heAOMs” describes an individual case of nausea and vomiting, but gives no registration-trial findings on event severity, duration, or treatment discontinuation. Searches for mild or moderate gastrointestinal events, transient effects, and discontinuation found no passage addressing those claims; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMost gastrointestinal adverse events with GLP-1 receptor-activating AOMs are mild or moderate, dose-dependent, and transient.
“Most of these events are mild or moderate, dose-dependent, and transient in nature [22,25].”
From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The section 'Approach to the patient with obesity experiencing substantial weight reduction with heAOMs' describes one patient’s nausea and vomiting during heAOM therapy, but does not characterize most gastrointestinal adverse events as mild or moderate, dose-dependent, or transient. A search for those terms found no passage establishing that pattern; the paper’s reference to dose dependence concerns weight reduction, not adverse events. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 18
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bays, 2022, Anti-obesity medications and investigational agents: an obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars
- Hollander, 2017, Coadministration of canagliflozin and phentermine for weight management in overweight and obese individuals without diabetes: a randomized clinical trial, Diabetes Care, 40, 632, 10.2337/dc16-2427 · DOI · Paper page
- Aronne, 2013, Evaluation of phentermine and topiramate versus phentermine/topiramate extended-release in obese adults, Obesity, 21, 2163, 10.1002/oby.20584 · DOI · Paper page
- Wilding, 2021, Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity, N Engl J Med, 384, 989, 10.1056/NEJMoa2032183 · DOI · Paper page
- Pi-Sunyer, 2015, A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management, N Engl J Med, 373, 11, 10.1056/NEJMoa1411892 · DOI · Paper page
- Garvey, 2012, Two-year sustained weight loss and metabolic benefits with controlled-release phentermine/topiramate in obese and overweight adults (SEQUEL): a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 extension study, Am J Clin Nutr, 95, 297, 10.3945/ajcn.111.024927 · DOI · Paper page
- Apovian, 2013, A randomized, phase 3 trial of naltrexone SR/bupropion SR on weight and obesity-related risk factors (COR-II), Obesity, 21, 935, 10.1002/oby.20309 · DOI · Paper page
- Greenway, 2019, A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of Gelesis100: a novel nonsystemic oral hydrogel for weight loss, Obesity, 27, 205, 10.1002/oby.22347 · DOI · Paper page
- Bays, 2022, Thirty obesity myths, misunderstandings, and/or oversimplifications: an obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars, 3, 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100034 · DOI · Paper page
- DeJesus, 2019, Experience and expectations of patients on weight loss: the learning health system network experience, Obesity Science & Practice, 5, 479, 10.1002/osp4.364 · DOI
- Fitch, 2022, Obesity definition, diagnosis, bias, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and telehealth: an Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars, 1, 10.1016/j.obpill.2021.100004 · DOI
- Freshwater, 2022, Behavior, motivational interviewing, eating disorders, and obesity management technologies: an Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars, 2, 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100014 · DOI
- Song, 2008, Association between support group attendance and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Surg Obes Relat Dis, 4, 100, 10.1016/j.soard.2007.02.010 · DOI
- Kaiser, 2011, Positive relationship between support group attendance and one-year postoperative weight loss in gastric banding patients, Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery, 7 1, 89, 10.1016/j.soard.2010.07.013 · DOI
- Lazarus, 2022, Cancer and obesity: an obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars, 3, 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100026 · DOI
- Álvaro Sanz, 2021, Impact of weight loss on cancer patients' quality of life at the beginning of the chemotherapy, Support Care Cancer, 29, 627
- Tondt, 2022, Concomitant medications, functional foods, and supplements: an obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2022, Obesity Pillars, 2, 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100017 · DOI
- Alibhai, 2005, An approach to the management of unintentional weight loss in elderly people, CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J) : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 172, 773, 10.1503/cmaj.1031527 · DOI
- Shelton, 2011, Inflammation in depression: is adiposity a cause?, Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 13, 41, 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.1/rshelton · DOI
- McKay, 2021, Plasma levels of ghrelin and GLP-1, but not leptin or amylin, respond to a psychosocial stressor in women and men, Horm Behav, 134, 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2021.105017 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Bays, H. E., Burridge, K., Richards, J., & Fitch, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- University of Oklahoma (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bays, Harold Edward
- Venue
- Obesity Pillars
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 100039
- ISSN
- 2667-3681 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10662002
- OpenAlex
- W4307646080
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Obesity Pillars (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- anti-obesity drugs, excessive weight loss, hyper-responders, obesity treatment, body composition assessment, shared decision-making, medication dose adjustment, patient education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review