Cited by 6Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsRobotic Locomotion and ControlReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Deep reinforcement learning enabling a BCFbot to learn various undulatory patterns

Open access
Hameed, Imran, Chao, Xu, Navarro-Alarcon, David, Jing, Xingjian·2025·Ocean Engineering

Abstract

In bio-inspired marine robots, one particular motion pattern is generally adopted to achieve benefits of that pattern. However, multiple gait patterns can be utilized together in a single biomimetic design to employ their benefits, as required. However, there is a lack of a unified control scheme that can be used to optimize and mimic undulatory patterns observed among different organisms in the body and/or caudal fin (BCF) category. Thus, central pattern generators (CPGs) were incorporated into a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) architecture to train a robot to develop various swimming gaits. The proposed framework can not only develop and optimize distinct motion patterns but also seamlessly and instantly switch between them. Oscillators integrated into a learning paradigm provide a bioinspired framework to systematically develop a variety of swimming gaits. The prototyped BCFbot has multiple joints, which makes it easy to realize more than one tail undulation patterns. Three different swimming patterns (anguilliform, sub-carangiform, and carangiform) were learned through simulation and then verified on a physical robot. Testing and comparison results show that the claimed benefits of the three benchmark motion patterns can be well realized using the developed robot and can be freely switched and optimized using the developed DRL mechanism. This should be the first attempt for achieving a multimotion pattern optimization and switching within a single BCFbot and demonstrati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120322

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hameed, I., Chao, X., Navarro-Alarcon, D., & Jing, X.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Jing, Xingjian
Venue
Ocean Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-03
Volume
320
Pages
120322
ISSN
0029-8018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406255022
Cited by
5
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ocean Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
City University of Hong Kong (9380140)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
undulatory locomotion, deep reinforcement learning, central pattern generator, gait transition, swimming gait, anguilliform locomotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review