Cited by 64Coastal and Marine DynamicsCoastal and Marine ManagementDisaster Management and Resilience

Variables shaping coastal adaptation decisions to armor, nourish, and retreat in North Carolina

Siders, A.R., Keenan, Jesse M.·2020·Ocean & Coastal Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105023

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siders, A. R., & Keenan, J. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Siders, A.R.
Venue
Ocean & Coastal Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
183
Pages
105023
ISSN
0964-5691 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982415456
Cited by
64
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ocean & Coastal Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
coastal climate change adaptation, shoreline armoring, beach nourishment, property acquisition, shoreline retreat, adaptation decision-making, risk exposure, critical infrastructure, social equity, racial diversity, North Carolina coast

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review