Cited by 45Flood Risk Assessment and ManagementDisaster Management and ResilienceSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Equitable buyouts? Learning from state, county, and local floodplain management programs

Open access
Shi, Linda, Fisher, Anjali, Brenner, Rebecca M., Greiner-Safi, Amelia, Shepard, Christine, Vanucchi, Jamie·2022·Climatic Change

Abstract

Climate change-exacerbated flooding has renewed interest in property buyouts as a pillar of managed retreat from coastal zones and floodplains in the United States. However, federal buyout programs are widely critiqued for being inaccessible and inequitable. To learn whether and how subnational buyout programs overcome these limitations, we examined five leading US state, county, and local buyout programs to see what they teach us about redesigning future federal policies. Our mixed-methods research used interviews and document analysis to develop case studies, juxtaposed subnational strategies against a review of critiques of federal buyouts, and focus group discussions with subnational buyout managers and experts to identify limitations of their programs. We find that subnational programs can be more inclusive and better respond to resident needs as compared to existing federal programs due to their access to dedicated, non-federal funding and their standing institutional status, which allows them to learn and evolve over time. Nevertheless, these programs lack coordination with and control over agencies that permit development and produce affordable housing. This gives buyout programs limited power in shaping the overall equity of who lives in floodplains and who has access to affordable, resilient housing after a buyout. Their experiences suggest federal programs can support managed retreat nationwide by increasing support for institutional and staff capacity at state and county levels, encouraging efforts to bridge institutional silos at subnational levels, and holistically mainstream climate considerations into regional floodplain development, affordable housing production, and flood risk mitigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-022-03453-5

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Racially segregated residential areas are more strongly associated with fine particulate metals from human activity (such as industrial emissions, vehicle engines, and shipping emissions) than natural sources.

    “One recent study, for example, finds that racially segregated residential areas are more strongly associated with fine particulate metals from human activity (such as industrial emissions, vehicle engines, and shipping emissions) than natural sources.165,166”

    From NPCC4: Advancing climate justice in climate adaptation strategies for New York City (2024) · cites this paper as [166]

    The section “FEMA buyouts and their inequitable effects” discusses racial segregation by altitude and flood risk, not particulate-metal exposure. Searches for fine particulate metals, emissions, and human versus natural pollution sources found no passage addressing the claimed comparison in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bullard RD, Wright B (2012) The wrong complexion for protection: how the government response to disaster endangers African American communities. New York University Press, New York
  2. Freudenberg R Calvin E Tolkoff L Brawley D Buy-in for buyouts: the case for managed retreat from flood zones 2016 Cambridge, MA Lincoln Institute for Land Policy
  3. Fullilove MT Root shock: how tearing up city neighborhoods hurts America, and what we can do about it 2016 New York New Village Press
  4. HUD Exchange (n.d.) flood insurance. Last accessed on 19 Oct 2022 from: https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/flood-insurance
  5. Marino E Fierce climate, sacred ground: an ethnography of climate change in Shishmaref 2015 Alaska University of Alaska Press, Fairbanks
  6. Rawls J A theory of justice 1971 Cambridge, MA Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, L., Fisher, A., Brenner, R. M., Greiner-Safi, A., Shepard, C., & Vanucchi, J.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
Corresponding author
Shi, Linda
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2022-10
Volume
174
Issue
3-4
Pages
29-29
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W4308186549
Cited by
45
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climatic Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University (Innovation for Impact Grant)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
managed retreat, floodplain management, equity, coastal flooding, climate change, affordable housing, institutional capacity, institutional silos, flood risk mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review