Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Balancing recreation and flood safety for integrated coastal management: understanding beach visitors’ types of attitude and behaviour in sandy anthropogenic shores

Bakhshianlamouki, Elham, Augustijn, Ellen-Wien, van den Heuvel, Jasper, Terpstra, Teun, Brugnach, Marcela, Voinov, Alexey, Wijnberg, Kathelijne·2024·Ocean & Coastal Management

Abstract

In the Netherlands, with its coastal lowlands, coastal management is performed through sand nourishment and dune utilisation. While policy aims for multifunctionality, coastal management studies predominantly emphasise flood safety, neglecting the recreational function and its interplay with flood safety measures. This study aims to investigate beach visitors' views and behaviour at two reinforced sandy shores in the Netherlands, namely Sand Motor and Hondsbossche Dunes. As the magnitude of the sand-based reinforcements completely changed the original beach landscape, we refer to these as sandy anthropogenic shores (SAS). We conducted surveys to assess SAS visitors' profiles, attitudes (visit motivations, landscape attractiveness), and recreational behaviour (facility preferences, activities, visitation patterns, spatial distribution). We examined differences between SAS and non-SAS beach visitors and compared their perspectives with management expectations. In our analysis, we categorised visitors into three types: local, one-day, and overnight visitors. Our analysis identified three distinct visitor motivation clusters: socialising, relaxation while appreciating beach landscapes, and engaging in sports activities. Natural landscape quality and quietness were the top attractions for SAS visitors. Despite significant human intervention in the design and alteration of the SAS landscape, visitors still appreciate its natural dynamics and beauty. Our analysis indicates that users perceive the SAS as either natural or semi-natural beaches, as intended by their designers and managers. We also developed a conceptual framework of the SAS recreation model based on survey data, forming the foundation for a quantitative model of SAS socio-environmental dynamics in the next phase of our research. Moreover, considering the similarities between SAS and natural shores, we anticipate that our findings will have broad applicability well beyond the specific SAS we have studied. • In-depth analysis compares SAS visitor behaviour and attitudes to those of non-SAS beaches. • Natural landscape quality and quietness were the top attractions for SAS visitors. • The initial design of the SAS landscape successfully attracts the target visitors. • The SAS dynamic landscape is expected to change recreational activity patterns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107407

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/12736811427387828
https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/12736811427387828CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 The sandy anthropogenic shores (SAS) in the Netherlands: a. Sand Motor, in the province of South Holland and b. Hondsbossche Dunes (HBD) in the province of North Holland.
Fig. 2 The sandy anthropogenic shores (SAS) in the Netherlands: a. Sand Motor, in the province of South Holland and b. Hondsbossche Dunes (HBD) in the province of North Holland.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Distribution of visitors among three categories of local, one-day trip, and stay overnight visitors.
Fig. 3 Distribution of visitors among three categories of local, one-day trip, and stay overnight visitors.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 Visitor motivation for visiting Sand Motor and HBD by type (Local, ODT, SON).
Fig. 4 Visitor motivation for visiting Sand Motor and HBD by type (Local, ODT, SON).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 5 Visitor attitude: attractive aspects of the beach landscape quality.
Fig. 5 Visitor attitude: attractive aspects of the beach landscape quality.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 6 Visitor opinion about attractive aspects of the beach landscape quality by visitor type (Local, ODT, SON) in Sand Motor and HBD.
Fig. 6 Visitor opinion about attractive aspects of the beach landscape quality by visitor type (Local, ODT, SON) in Sand Motor and HBD.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 7 The visitors opinion about various characteristics of the landscape: a) width of the beach, b) Natural landscape beauty, c) balance between recreation and nature, d) the importance of the lagoon for different aims.
Fig. 7 The visitors opinion about various characteristics of the landscape: a) width of the beach, b) Natural landscape beauty, c) balance between recreation and nature, d) the importance of the lagoon for different aims.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 8 Beach interview locations and visitor distribution by zones.
Fig. 8 Beach interview locations and visitor distribution by zones.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 12
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 13
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 10 Visitor preferences for different recreational activities by type (Local, ODT, SON) in Sand Motor and HBD.
Fig. 10 Visitor preferences for different recreational activities by type (Local, ODT, SON) in Sand Motor and HBD.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 11 Visitor Preferences: Key facilities importance by type (Local, ODT, SON) in Sand Motor and HBD.
Fig. 11 Visitor Preferences: Key facilities importance by type (Local, ODT, SON) in Sand Motor and HBD.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 12 Seasonal visit preferences by visitor type (Local, ODT, SON) in Sand Motor and HBD.
Fig. 12 Seasonal visit preferences by visitor type (Local, ODT, SON) in Sand Motor and HBD.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 13 The conceptual framework of the SAS recreation model considering both the management sector and visitor insights.
Fig. 13 The conceptual framework of the SAS recreation model considering both the management sector and visitor insights.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kammler, 2004, Spatial and temporal analysis of beach tourism using webcam and aerial photographs, Coastline Rep., 2, 121
  2. Pranzini, 2018, Nourishing tourist beaches, vol. 24

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Bakhshianlamouki, E., Augustijn, E.-W., van den Heuvel, J., Terpstra, T., Brugnach, M., Voinov, A., & Wijnberg, K.
Venue
Ocean & Coastal Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
258
Pages
107407
ISSN
0964-5691
Cited by
5
References
75
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Dutch Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Balancing recreation and flood safety for integrated coastal management: understanding beach visitors’ types of attitude and behaviour in sandy anthropogenic shores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107407
The paper
Bakhshianlamouki, E., Augustijn, E.-W., van den Heuvel, J., Terpstra, T., Brugnach, M., Voinov, A., & Wijnberg, K. (2024). Balancing recreation and flood safety for integrated coastal management: understanding beach visitors’ types of attitude and behaviour in sandy anthropogenic shores. Ocean & Coastal Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107407

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.