Cited by 564Technology Adoption and User BehaviourPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

Consumer trust in e-commerce in the United States, Singapore and China

TEO, T, LIU, J·2007·Omega

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.omega.2005.02.001

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TEO, T., & LIU, J.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
TEO, T
ORCID
LIU, J
Venue
Omega
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
22-38
ISSN
0305-0483 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155986346
Cited by
564
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 30
FWCI
18.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Omega (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
consumer trust, e-commerce, system assurance, risk perception, consumer attitudes, cross-cultural comparison, United States, Singapore, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review