CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 74finance, banking, and market dynamicsCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyCorporate Identity and Reputation

Do we bank on regulation or reputation? A meta-analysis and meta-regression of organizational trust in the financial services sector

Open access
Nienaber, Ann-Marie, Hofeditz, Marcel, H. Searle, Rosalind·2014·International Journal of Bank Marketing
DOI 10.1108/ijbm-12-2013-0146
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Purpose: – Trust in financial institutions has been eroded through the collapse of mortgage-related securities, with confidence further denuded through well publicized cases of rogue traders and rate fixing cases, such as with the Lehman brothers, the Libor rate-fixing scandals, and the hypo real estate breakdown. In response to these events, governments have introduced a range of distinct policy initiatives designed to restore trust in this sector. Thus, the question arises: are these regulations and control mechanisms sufficient in isolation, or are there other elements that this sector needs to pay attention to in efforts to build and sustain customers’ trust? The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: – There is a compelling agenda for both financial organizations and academics to understand better organizational trust in this context especially the role and impact of regulatory mechanisms in its development and repair. The paper therefore examines the special facets of the financial services sector in comparison to other sectors, such as manufacturing, to consider whether trust is fundamentally different in this context than others, and thus address how far there are special challenges concerning trust and the banking industry. The paper analyses, by using a meta-analytical design, 93 studies ( N =38,631), of which 20 empirically investigate organizational trust in the financial sector with a combined N of 11,224 respondents. Findings: – The paper shows that the banking sector is heavily affected by two distinct forces: first, customers’ perception of an organization's level of compliance and conformity with laws and regulations is a necessity for banks’ sociopolitical legitimization, and second it is also related to how non-compliance is dealt with. Importantly, this meta-analysis indicates that regulation is just one of a suite of devices that organizations need to deploy in their efforts to restore trust. The paper identified two further elements of significance: customers require direct evidence, derived either from their own or others’ satisfaction with the goods or services provided, and customers do take note of the external endorsement of the firm, especially in Asia, where customers place huge emphasis on the firm's reputation. Research limitations/implications: – First, meta-analysis is inherently reliant on the earlier studies and therefore retains their weaknesses. Some of the relationships included self-report variables collected at the same point in time and therefore may be inflated by common method bias. Second, due to the focus and because of the limited number of studies in this sector, and a paucity of attention on some key topics, such as perceptions of regulation, second-order sampling error may also be a limitation. Third, some relationships were not investigated frequently enough in studies to enable us to include them in the review, such as cooperation, opportunistic behaviour or quality. Finally, despite calls for trust scholars to include propensity to trust measures within their studies, many of these studies do not include this measure and therefore it is more difficult to identify and control individual difference factors. Practical implications: – The results show the merit of multi-strand trust development strategies. There is a striking paucity of financial institutions, which have examined how far their trust deficit may be related to their internal culture, and whether recent corporate corruption could be the product of bonuses and the internal short-term individualized reward systems. The analysis reveals that although external regulations and controls are an effective and powerful devise for organizational trust, over the last two periods of significant crisis, their impact appears to be warning; Yet reassuring customers of their expectations of the other party's future behaviour is central to trust. Alternative remedies need to be considered, such as the establishment of a more effective regulator, or board of governors who oversee and assure compliance. Monitoring and surveillance offer a further external means of reducing the possibility of future misbehaviours. However, as the analysis indicates, other strands are required to build trust, including greater attention by firms on customers’ direct experiences, which in turn would enhance the third part endorsement of their competence and goodwill intentions of organizations. Social implications: – Significantly, the results indicate the potentially partial erosion of credence factors, and thus confidence, in this sector over the last 20 years, during what has been a period of repeated exposure to trust breaches. The paper shows that single strand solutions, such as improvements to customer communication, are no longer sufficient, nor, more importantly, do they have the same impact. Instead, the paper shows the necessity to utilize more effectively and target attention towards three distinct antecedents: external regulations and their enforcement; third party and expert endorsements, and therefore external reputations; and customer satisfaction in terms of the effective delivery of customer expectations. Originality/value: – Organizational trust has been shown as critical in positively affecting and repairing broken relationships through uncertainty reduction and confidence enhancement. In the past, different meta-analyses of trust have been undertaken, but this, to the authors knowledge, is the first meta-analytic study measuring trust on an organizational level in the context of the financial services sector and its regulatory environment. This meta-analysis indicates that regulation is just one of a suite of devices that organizations need to deploy in their efforts to restore trust. The paper identified two further elements: customers require direct evidence, and do take note of the external endorsement of the firm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijbm-12-2013-0146

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Burt, R. S., 8E Knez, M. 1996. Trust and third-party gossip. In R. M. Kraraer and T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations:Frontiers of theory and research: 68-89. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
  2. Carnevale, P. J., and Lawler, E. J. (1986). Time pressure and the developmenot f integrative agreements in bilateral negotiation. Journal for Conflict Resolution, 30, 636-659.
  3. Carnevale, P.J. and Pruitt, D.G. (1992). Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 531-582.
  4. De Dreu CKW, Giebels E, and Van de Vliert E. (1998). Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: the distniptive effects of punitive capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 408-422.
  5. Deephouse, D. (1999).To be different or to be the same? It's a question of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 147-166.
  6. Deutsch, M, 1958. Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2: 265-279.
  7. Heliwell, J. and Huang, H. (2008). Well-being and trust in workplace. Working Paper 14589. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
  8. Kharouf, H., and Sekhon, H. (2008). Trustworthiness within the Hotel Sector: A structural Model, IIMA conference proceedings: India
  9. Larrick, R. P., and Blount, S. (1995). Social context in tacit bargaining games: Consequences for perceptions of affinity and cooperative behavior. In R. M. Kramer and D. M. Messick (Eds.), Negotiation as a social process (pp. 268-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  10. Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence and trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (editor) Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relationships.. pp. 94-107.
  11. Pearson, C.M. and Mitroff, I.I. (1993). From crisis prone to crisis prepared: a framework for crisis management. Academy of Management Executive, 7(1).
  12. Robbins, S.P. and Judge, T.A. (1992). Organizational Behavior, Upper Saddle River: Pearson. Ross. W. H.. and Wieland, C. 1996, Effects ol interpersonal trust and time pressure on managerial mediation strategy in a simulated organizational dispute. Journal of Applied Psychology. 81: 228-248.
  13. Weingart, L. R., Bennett, R. J. and Brett, J. M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504-517.
  14. Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Los Angeles, CA: Free Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Nienaber, A.-M., Hofeditz, M., & H. Searle, R.
Affiliations
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • University of Münster (DE)
ORCID
Nienaber, Ann-Marie
Venue
International Journal of Bank Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
367-407
ISSN
0265-2323 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/ijbm-12-2013-0146
OpenAlex
W1997468036
Cited by
74
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Bank Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › finance, banking, and market dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
Keywords
organizational trust, financial services, trust in banks, regulation, reputation, consumer trust, regulatory compliance, non-compliance, customer satisfaction, mortgage-backed securities, trust repair, Asia, common method bias, Lehman Brothers, rogue traders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review