Cited by 287Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCultural Differences and ValuesPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

National culture and consumer trust in e-commerce

Hallikainen, Heli, Laukkanen, Tommi·2018·International Journal of Information Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.002

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hallikainen, H., & Laukkanen, T.
Affiliations
University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Hallikainen, Heli
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
97-106
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2760195486
Cited by
287
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 11
FWCI
35.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
national culture, consumer trust, e-commerce, Hofstede cultural dimensions, disposition to trust, perceived trustworthiness, online store, online bookstores, mediation, China, Finland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review