CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 927RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimization of Lipid Nanoparticles for Intramuscular Administration of mRNA Vaccines

Open access
Hassett, Kimberly J., Benenato, Kerry E., Jacquinet, Eric, Lee, Aisha, Woods, Angela, Yuzhakov, Olga, Himansu, Sunny, Deterling, Jessica, Geilich, Benjamin M., Ketova, Tatiana, Mihai, Cosmin, Lynn, Andy, McFadyen, Iain, Moore, Melissa J., Senn, Joseph J., Stanton, Matthew G., Almarsson, Örn, Ciaramella, Giuseppe, Brito, Luis A.·2019·Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids
DOI 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.01.013PMC PMC6383180
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

mRNA vaccines have the potential to tackle many unmet medical needs that are unable to be addressed with conventional vaccine technologies. A potent and well-tolerated delivery technology is integral to fully realizing the potential of mRNA vaccines. Pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that mRNA delivered intramuscularly (IM) with first-generation lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) generates robust immune responses. Despite progress made over the past several years, there remains significant opportunity for improvement, as the most advanced LNPs were designed for intravenous (IV) delivery of siRNA to the liver. Here, we screened a panel of proprietary biodegradable ionizable lipids for both expression and immunogenicity in a rodent model when administered IM. A subset of compounds was selected and further evaluated for tolerability, immunogenicity, and expression in rodents and non-human primates (NHPs). A lead formulation was identified that yielded a robust immune response with improved tolerability. More importantly for vaccines, increased innate immune stimulation driven by LNPs does not equate to increased immunogenicity, illustrating that mRNA vaccine tolerability can be improved without affecting potency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.01.013

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 1 Pharmacokinetics of LNPs containing MC3 after IM administration in mice Lipid concentration (nanograms per gram) after IM administration of modified mRNA encoding luciferase formulated in LNPs containing MC3 (gray triangles) in muscle, liver, and spleen up to 24 h post-injection (n = 3 per group per time point).
Figure 1 Pharmacokinetics of LNPs containing MC3 after IM administration in mice Lipid concentration (nanograms per gram) after IM administration of modified mRNA encoding luciferase formulated in LNPs containing MC3 (gray triangles) in muscle, liver, and spleen up to 24 h post-injection (n = 3 per group per time point).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Expression and Immunogenicity from LNPs Containing Novel Ionizable Lipids in Mice (A) Thirty novel lipid LNPs, A through E′ were compared to a D (MC3) LNP control for expression and immunogenicity. Lipids are arranged left to right in order of pKa from low (A) to high (DOTAP). Expression measured by luminescence in flux (photons per second) 6 h after administration of modified mRNA encoding luciferase delivered at 0.5 mg/kg IV in CD-1 mice, 0.01 mg/kg IM or 0.001 mg/kg IM in BALB/c mice (n = 5 per group). Immunogenicity measured by H10-specific IgG titers measured 2 weeks after two doses administered 3 weeks apart delivered IM at 0.001 mg/kg IM in BALB/c mice (n = 5 per group). Data are represented as log2 fold change compared to MC3. Squares containing an X indicate >4-fold change (log2) lower than for MC3. (B) Log2 fold increase in expression was compared to the log2 fold change in immunogenicity at the low dose level administered IM (0.001 mg/kg). The five lead novel lipids and MC3 LNPs are labeled accordingly: MC3 (gray triangles), lipid H (green circles), lipid M (orange squares), lipid P (purple diamonds), lipid Q (tan inverted triangles), and lipid N (yellow hexagons). (C) Lipid pKa versus fold increase in immunogenicity at 0.001 mg/kg IM for lipids A through E′. (D) Circulating IgG antibody (micrograms per milliliter of serum) 6 h after administration of 0.2 mg/kg modified mRNAs encoding the heavy chain and light chain of an influenza monoclonal antibody formulated at a 2:1 mass ratio in LNPs containing MC3 or novel lipids (n = 5 per group). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001, ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test of each novel lipid versus MC3.
Figure 2 Expression and Immunogenicity from LNPs Containing Novel Ionizable Lipids in Mice (A) Thirty novel lipid LNPs, A through E′ were compared to a D (MC3) LNP control for expression and immunogenicity. Lipids are arranged left to right in order of pKa from low (A) to high (DOTAP). Expression measured by luminescence in flux (photons per second) 6 h after administration of modified mRNA encoding luciferase delivered at 0.5 mg/kg IV in CD-1 mice, 0.01 mg/kg IM or 0.001 mg/kg IM in BALB/c mice (n = 5 per group). Immunogenicity measured by H10-specific IgG titers measured 2 weeks after two doses administered 3 weeks apart delivered IM at 0.001 mg/kg IM in BALB/c mice (n = 5 per group). Data are represented as log2 fold change compared to MC3. Squares containing an X indicate >4-fold change (log2) lower than for MC3. (B) Log2 fold increase in expression was compared to the log2 fold change in immunogenicity at the low dose level administered IM (0.001 mg/kg). The five lead novel lipids and MC3 LNPs are labeled accordingly: MC3 (gray triangles), lipid H (green circles), lipid M (orange squares), lipid P (purple diamonds), lipid Q (tan inverted triangles), and lipid N (yellow hexagons). (C) Lipid pKa versus fold increase in immunogenicity at 0.001 mg/kg IM for lipids A through E′. (D) Circulating IgG antibody (micrograms per milliliter of serum) 6 h after administration of 0.2 mg/kg modified mRNAs encoding the heavy chain and light chain of an influenza monoclonal antibody formulated at a 2:1 mass ratio in LNPs containing MC3 or novel lipids (n = 5 per group). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001, ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test of each novel lipid versus MC3.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Chemical Structure and Pharmacokinetics of Lead Lipids (A) Chemical structures and pKa of MC3 and novel lipids. (B–D) Lipid concentration (nanograms per gram) after IM administration of modified mRNA encoding luciferase formulated in LNPs containing lipid H (green circles), lipid M (orange squares), lipid P (purple diamonds), lipid Q (tan inverted triangles), and lipid N (yellow hexagons) in (B) muscle, (C) liver, and (D) spleen up to 48 h post-injection (n = 3 per group per time point).
Figure 3 Chemical Structure and Pharmacokinetics of Lead Lipids (A) Chemical structures and pKa of MC3 and novel lipids. (B–D) Lipid concentration (nanograms per gram) after IM administration of modified mRNA encoding luciferase formulated in LNPs containing lipid H (green circles), lipid M (orange squares), lipid P (purple diamonds), lipid Q (tan inverted triangles), and lipid N (yellow hexagons) in (B) muscle, (C) liver, and (D) spleen up to 48 h post-injection (n = 3 per group per time point).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Expression and Immunogenicity in Non-human Primates (A and B) Immunogenicity measured by H10-specific (A) ELISA or (B) HAI at days 0, 21 (3 weeks after the first dose), and 42 (3 weeks after the second dose). Each dose in cynomolgus monkeys contained 5 μg modified mRNA encoding H10N8 formulated in LNPs containing either MC3 (gray triangles), lipid H (green circles), lipid M (orange squares), lipid P (purple diamonds), lipid Q (tan inverted triangles), or lipid N (yellow hexagons) (n = 3 per group). (C) Circulating IgG levels (in micrograms per milliliter) after a 500-μg IM administration in cynomolgus monkeys of modified mRNA encoding heavy- and light-chain antibodies in a 2:1 weight ratio formulated in LNPs containing MC3 or novel lipids (n = 3 per group). (D and E) Site of injection was monitored for (D) edema and (E) erythema 1 and 3 days after injection. (F) Circulating IL-6 levels (in picograms per milliliter) 6 h after administration. #p > 0.05; ##p > 0.001, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test of each lipid versus MC3 at each time point. **p > 0.01; ****p > 0.0001, z test of areas under the curve (AUCs) for each novel lipid versus MC3.
Figure 4 Expression and Immunogenicity in Non-human Primates (A and B) Immunogenicity measured by H10-specific (A) ELISA or (B) HAI at days 0, 21 (3 weeks after the first dose), and 42 (3 weeks after the second dose). Each dose in cynomolgus monkeys contained 5 μg modified mRNA encoding H10N8 formulated in LNPs containing either MC3 (gray triangles), lipid H (green circles), lipid M (orange squares), lipid P (purple diamonds), lipid Q (tan inverted triangles), or lipid N (yellow hexagons) (n = 3 per group). (C) Circulating IgG levels (in micrograms per milliliter) after a 500-μg IM administration in cynomolgus monkeys of modified mRNA encoding heavy- and light-chain antibodies in a 2:1 weight ratio formulated in LNPs containing MC3 or novel lipids (n = 3 per group). (D and E) Site of injection was monitored for (D) edema and (E) erythema 1 and 3 days after injection. (F) Circulating IL-6 levels (in picograms per milliliter) 6 h after administration. #p > 0.05; ##p > 0.001, two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test of each lipid versus MC3 at each time point. **p > 0.01; ****p > 0.0001, z test of areas under the curve (AUCs) for each novel lipid versus MC3.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Tolerability in Rats Serum concentrations (in picograms per milliliter) of cytokines (A) eotaxin, (B) GRO-alpha, (C) IP-10, (D) RANTES, and (E) MCP-1 were measured 6 h after a single IM administration of 0.01 mg or 0.1 mg modified mRNA encoding prM-E from Zika virus formulated in LNPs containing MC3 (gray), lipid H (green), lipid M (orange), lipid P (purple), lipid Q (tan), or lipid N (yellow) (n = 3 per group). (F–I) Representative histology sections stained with H&E 2 days after a single IM administration of 0.1 mg of modified mRNA encoding prM-E from Zika virus formulated in LNPs containing MC3 or lipid H in the (F and H) muscle and (G and I) skin. (F) MC3 muscle; (G) MC3 skin; (H) lipid H muscle; (I) lipid H skin.
Figure 5 Tolerability in Rats Serum concentrations (in picograms per milliliter) of cytokines (A) eotaxin, (B) GRO-alpha, (C) IP-10, (D) RANTES, and (E) MCP-1 were measured 6 h after a single IM administration of 0.01 mg or 0.1 mg modified mRNA encoding prM-E from Zika virus formulated in LNPs containing MC3 (gray), lipid H (green), lipid M (orange), lipid P (purple), lipid Q (tan), or lipid N (yellow) (n = 3 per group). (F–I) Representative histology sections stained with H&E 2 days after a single IM administration of 0.1 mg of modified mRNA encoding prM-E from Zika virus formulated in LNPs containing MC3 or lipid H in the (F and H) muscle and (G and I) skin. (F) MC3 muscle; (G) MC3 skin; (H) lipid H muscle; (I) lipid H skin.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–918 of 918

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hassett, K. J., Benenato, K. E., Jacquinet, E., Lee, A., Woods, A., Yuzhakov, O., Himansu, S., Deterling, J., Geilich, B. M., Ketova, T., Mihai, C., Lynn, A., McFadyen, I., Moore, M. J., Senn, J. J., Stanton, M. G., Almarsson, Ö., Ciaramella, G., & Brito, L. A.
Affiliations
Moderna Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Brito, Luis A.
ORCID
Venue
Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
15
Pages
1-11
ISSN
2162-2531 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.omtn.2019.01.013
PMC
PMC6383180
OpenAlex
W2914060533
Cited by
927
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 141 · 2025: 202 · 2024: 162 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 5
FWCI
23.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Moderna Therapeutics
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
lipid nanoparticles, mRNA vaccines, intramuscular administration, ionizable lipids, biodegradable lipids, immunogenicity, tolerability, innate immune activation, non-human primates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review