Cited by 2,728Immune Response and InflammationImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesRNA modifications and cancer

Suppression of RNA Recognition by Toll-like Receptors: The Impact of Nucleoside Modification and the Evolutionary Origin of RNA

Open access
Karikó, Katalin, Buckstein, Michael, Ni, Houping, Weissman, Drew·2005·Immunity

Abstract

DNA and RNA stimulate the mammalian innate immune system through activation of Toll-like receptors (TLRs). DNA containing methylated CpG motifs, however, is not stimulatory. Selected nucleosides in naturally occurring RNA are also methylated or otherwise modified, but the immunomodulatory effects of these alterations remain untested. We show that RNA signals through human TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8, but incorporation of modified nucleosides m5C, m6A, m5U, s2U, or pseudouridine ablates activity. Dendritic cells (DCs) exposed to such modified RNA express significantly less cytokines and activation markers than those treated with unmodified RNA. DCs and TLR-expressing cells are potently activated by bacterial and mitochondrial RNA, but not by mammalian total RNA, which is abundant in modified nucleosides. We conclude that nucleoside modifications suppress the potential of RNA to activate DCs. The innate immune system may therefore detect RNA lacking nucleoside modification as a means of selectively responding to bacteria or necrotic tissue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.06.008

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chemical modification is widely believed to be critical to the recent success of mRNA vaccines.

    “which is widely believed to be critical to the recent success of mRNA vaccines1,2,10,37,38”
  • Modifications to the spike protein are intended to reduce the innate immune response by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokines, while the lipid nanoparticle vehicle/EV for the mRNA acts as an adjuvant to enhance the immune response.

    “Modifications to the spike protein are intended to reduce the innate immune response by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokines, while at the same time, the lipid nanoparticle vehicle/EV for the mRNA acts as an adjuvant to enhance the immune response. 194-196”

    From COVID-19, Myocarditis and Pericarditis (2023) · cites this paper as [194]

  • In vitro transcribed mRNA has the risk of triggering pattern recognition receptors in the endosome or cytoplasm, leading to an anti-viral response and shutdown of translation that can lower expression of the mRNA-encoded protein.

    “In general, in vitro transcribed mRNA has the risk of triggering various pattern recognition receptors in the endosome (e.g., TLR7/8) or the cytoplasm (e.g., RIG-I), which lead to an anti-viral response, followed by a shutdown of translation that can lower expression of the mRNA-encoded protein.25”
  • Pseudouridine-containing mRNAs reduced activation of known RNA sensors substantially.

    “Transferring this concept to in vitro transcribed mRNA, for instance, pseudouridine-containing mRNAs reduced activation of known RNA sensors substantially.”
  • Cytokine secretion by RNA-transfected cells strongly correlated with the extent of nucleoside modifications.

    “Obviously, cytokine secretion by RNA-transfected cells strongly correlated with the extent of nucleoside modifications.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karikó, K., Buckstein, M., Ni, H., & Weissman, D.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Karikó, Katalin
Venue
Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
165-175
ISSN
1074-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025980739
Cited by
2,728
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 319 · 2025: 387 · 2024: 355 · 2023: 323 · 2022: 296 · 2021: 267 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 39
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-50484, AI 060505, R01AI050484, R01AI060505)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE014825, DE 14825)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
Toll-like receptors, RNA recognition, nucleoside modification, TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, m5C, N6-methyladenosine, pseudouridine, dendritic cells, innate immunity, CpG methylation, mitochondrial RNA, bacterial RNA, RNA evolution, cytokine expression
MeSH terms
CD83 Antigen, Cell Line, Dendritic Cells, HLA-DR Antigens, Humans, Immunoglobulins, Membrane Glycoproteins, Nucleosides, Phosphatidylethanolamines, Receptors, Cell Surface, RNA, Signal Transduction, Biomarkers, Antigens, CD, Cytokines, Evolution, Molecular, Toll-Like Receptors, Toll-Like Receptor 3, Toll-Like Receptor 7, Toll-Like Receptor 8

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review