Cited by 9CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseasePluripotent Stem Cells Research

PINE-TREE enables highly efficient genetic modification of human cell lines.

Open access
Frisch, Carlye, Kostes, William W., Galyon, Brooke, Whitman, Brycelyn, Tekel, Stefan J., Standage-Beier, Kylie, Srinivasan, Gayathri, Wang, Xiao +1 more·2023·Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids

Abstract

Prime editing technologies enable precise genome editing without the caveats of CRISPR nuclease-based methods. Nonetheless, current approaches to identify and isolate prime-edited cell populations are inefficient. Here, we established a fluorescence-based system, prime-induced nucleotide engineering using a transient reporter for editing enrichment (PINE-TREE), for real-time enrichment of prime-edited cell populations. We demonstrated the broad utility of PINE-TREE for highly efficient introduction of substitutions, insertions, and deletions at various genomic loci. Finally, we employ PINE-TREE to rapidly and efficiently generate clonal isogenic human pluripotent stem cell lines, a cell type recalcitrant to genome editing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.07.007

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. [1]Rees H.A. Liu D.R. Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells Nat. Rev. Genet. 19 2018 770 788 10.1038/s41576-018-0059-1 30323312 PMC6535181 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Moon S.B. Kim D.Y. Ko J.H. Kim Y.S. Recent advances in the CRISPR genome editing tool set Exp. Mol. Med. 51 2019 1 11 10.1038/s12276-019-0339-7 PMC6828703 31685795 · DOI
  3. [3]Gaudelli N.M. Komor A.C. Rees H.A. Packer M.S. Badran A.H. Bryson D.I. Liu D.R. Programmable base editing of A∗T to G∗C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage Nature 551 2017 464 471 10.1038/nature24644 29160308 PMC5726555 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Komor A.C. Kim Y.B. Packer M.S. Zuris J.A. Liu D.R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage Nature 533 2016 420 424 10.1038/nature17946 27096365 PMC4873371 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Anzalone A.V. Randolph P.B. Davis J.R. Sousa A.A. Koblan L.W. Levy J.M. Chen P.J. Wilson C. Newby G.A. Raguram A. Liu D.R. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA Nature 576 2019 149 157 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 31634902 PMC6907074 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Habib O. Habib G. Hwang G.H. Bae S. Comprehensive analysis of prime editing outcomes in human embryonic stem cells Nucleic Acids Res. 50 2022 1187 1197 10.1093/nar/gkab1295 35018468 PMC8789035 · DOI
  7. [7]Li H. Busquets O. Verma Y. Syed K.M. Kutnowski N. Pangilinan G.R. Gilbert L.A. Bateup H.S. Rio D.C. Hockemeyer D. Soldner F. Highly efficient generation of isogenic pluripotent stem cell models using prime editing Elife 11 2022 e79208 10.7554/eLife.79208 PMC9584603 36069759 · DOI
  8. [8]Brookhouser N. Tekel S.J. Standage-Beier K. Nguyen T. Schwarz G. Wang X. Brafman D.A. BIG-TREE: Base-Edited Isogenic hPSC Line Generation Using a Transient Reporter for Editing Enrichment Stem Cell Rep. 14 2020 184 191 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.12.013 PMC7013208 32004495 · DOI
  9. [9]Brookhouser N. Nguyen T. Tekel S.J. Standage-Beier K. Wang X. Brafman D.A. A Cas9-mediated adenosine transient reporter enables enrichment of ABE-targeted cells BMC Biol. 18 2020 193 10.1186/s12915-020-00929-7 33317513 PMC7737295 · DOI
  10. [10]Tekel S.J. Standage-Beier K. Brookhouser N. Wang X. Brafman D.A. Cytosine and Adenosine Base Editing in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells (hPSCs) Using Transient Reporters for Editing Enrichment (TREE) Nat. Protoc. 47 2021 In Press 34172975
  11. [11]Standage-Beier K. Tekel S.J. Brookhouser N. Schwarz G. Nguyen T. Wang X. Brafman D.A. A transient reporter for editing enrichment (TREE) in human cells Nucleic Acids Res. 47 2019 e120 10.1093/nar/gkz713 31428784 PMC6821290 · DOI
  12. [12]Tong Y. Jørgensen T.S. Whitford C.M. Weber T. Lee S.Y. A versatile genetic engineering toolkit for E. coli based on CRISPR-prime editing Nat. Commun. 12 2021 5206 10.1038/s41467-021-25541-3 34471126 PMC8410854 · DOI
  13. [13]Lu C. Kuang J. Shao T. Xie S. Li M. Zhu L. Zhu L. Prime Editing: An All-Rounder for Genome Editing Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 2022 9862 10.3390/ijms23179862 PMC9456398 36077252 · DOI
  14. [15]Erwood S. Bily T.M.I. Lequyer J. Yan J. Gulati N. Brewer R.A. Zhou L. Pelletier L. Ivakine E.A. Cohn R.D. Saturation variant interpretation using CRISPR prime editing Nat. Biotechnol. 40 2022 885 895 10.1038/s41587-021-01201-1 35190686 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [16]Choi J. Chen W. Minkina A. Chardon F.M. Suiter C.C. Regalado S.G. Domcke S. Hamazaki N. Lee C. Martin B. A time-resolved, multi-symbol molecular recorder via sequential genome editing Nature 608 2022 98 107 10.1038/s41586-022-04922-8 35794474 PMC9352581 · DOI
  16. [17]Kim H.K. Yu G. Park J. Min S. Lee S. Yoon S. Kim H.H. Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells Nat. Biotechnol. 39 2021 198 206 10.1038/s41587-020-0677-y 32958957 · DOI
  17. [18]Chen P.J. Hussmann J.A. Yan J. Knipping F. Ravisankar P. Chen P.F. Chen C. Nelson J.W. Newby G.A. Sahin M. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes Cell 184 2021 5635 5652.e29 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.018 34653350 PMC8584034 · DOI
  18. [19]Nelson J.W. Randolph P.B. Shen S.P. Everette K.A. Chen P.J. Anzalone A.V. An M. Newby G.A. Chen J.C. Hsu A. Liu D.R. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency Nat. Biotechnol. 40 2022 402 410 10.1038/s41587-021-01039-7 34608327 PMC8930418 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [20]Tao J. Wang Q. Mendez-Dorantes C. Burns K.H. Chiarle R. Frequency and mechanisms of LINE-1 retrotransposon insertions at CRISPR/Cas9 sites Nat. Commun. 13 2022 3685 10.1038/s41467-022-31322-3 35760782 PMC9237045 · DOI
  20. [21]Standage-Beier K. Tekel S.J. Brafman D.A. Wang X. Prime Editing Guide RNA Design Automation Using PINE-CONE ACS Synth. Biol. 10 2021 422 427 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00445 33464043 PMC7901017 · DOI
  21. [23]Kwart D. Paquet D. Teo S. Tessier-Lavigne M. Precise and efficient scarless genome editing in stem cells using CORRECT Nat. Protoc. 12 2017 329 354 10.1038/nprot.2016.171 28102837 · DOI
  22. [24]Yu C. Liu Y. Ma T. Liu K. Xu S. Zhang Y. Liu H. La Russa M. Xie M. Ding S. Qi L.S. Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells Cell Stem Cell 16 2015 142 147 10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.003 25658371 PMC4461869 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [25]Chapman J.R. Taylor M.R.G. Boulton S.J. Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice Mol. Cell 47 2012 497 510 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.029 22920291 · DOI
  24. [26]Haapaniemi E. Botla S. Persson J. Schmierer B. Taipale J. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces a p53-mediated DNA damage response Nat. Med. 24 2018 927 930 10.1038/s41591-018-0049-z 29892067 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [27]Ihry R.J. Salick M.R. Ho D.J. Sondey M. Kommineni S. Paula S. Raymond J. Henry B. Frias E. Wang Q. Genome-Scale CRISPR Screens Identify Human Pluripotency-Specific Genes Cell Rep. 27 2019 616 630.e6 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.043 30970262 · DOI
  26. [28]Kosicki M. Tomberg K. Bradley A. Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR-Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements Nat. Biotechnol. 36 2018 765 771 10.1038/nbt.4192 30010673 PMC6390938 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [29]Simon D.A. Tálas A. Kulcsár P.I. Biczók Z. Krausz S.L. Várady G. Welker E. PEAR, a flexible fluorescent reporter for the identification and enrichment of successfully prime edited cells Elife 11 2022 e69504 10.7554/eLife.69504 PMC8865850 35196219 · DOI
  28. [30]Schene I.F. Joore I.P. Baijens J.H.L. Stevelink R. Kok G. Shehata S. Ilcken E.F. Nieuwenhuis E.C.M. Bolhuis D.P. van Rees R.C.M. Mutation-specific reporter for optimization and enrichment of prime editing Nat. Commun. 13 2022 1028 10.1038/s41467-022-28656-3 35232966 PMC8888566 · DOI
  29. [31]Raman S. Brookhouser N. Brafman D.A. Using Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (hiPSCs) to Investigate the Mechanisms by Which Apolipoprotein E (APOE) Contributes to Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Risk Neurobiol. Dis. 2020 104788 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104788 PMC7098264 32032733 · DOI
  30. [32]Ortmann D. Vallier L. Variability of human pluripotent stem cell lines Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 46 2017 179 185 10.1016/j.gde.2017.07.004 28843810 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [34]Tsai S.Q. Zheng Z. Nguyen N.T. Liebers M. Topkar V.V. Thapar V. Wyvekens N. Khayter C. Iafrate A.J. Le L.P. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases Nat. Biotechnol. 33 2015 187 197 10.1038/nbt.3117 25513782 PMC4320685 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [35]Ferreira da Silva J. Oliveira G.P. Arasa-Verge E.A. Kagiou C. Moretton A. Timelthaler G. Jiricny J. Loizou J.I. Prime editing efficiency and fidelity are enhanced in the absence of mismatch repair Nat. Commun. 13 2022 760 10.1038/s41467-022-28442-1 35140211 PMC8828784 · DOI
  33. [36]Eiges R. Schuldiner M. Drukker M. Yanuka O. Itskovitz-Eldor J. Benvenisty N. Establishment of human embryonic stem cell-transfected clones carrying a marker for undifferentiated cells Curr. Biol. 11 2001 514 518 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00144-0 11413002 · DOI
  34. [37]Moore J.C. Atze K. Yeung P.L. Toro-Ramos A.J. Camarillo C. Thompson K. Ricupero C.L. Brenneman M.A. Cohen R.I. Hart R.P. Efficient, high-throughput transfection of human embryonic stem cells Stem Cell Res. Ther. 1 2010 23 10.1186/scrt23 20659329 PMC2941115 · DOI
  35. [38]Haridhasapavalan K.K. Borgohain M.P. Dey C. Saha B. Narayan G. Kumar S. Thummer R.P. An insight into non-integrative gene delivery approaches to generate transgene-free induced pluripotent stem cells Gene 686 2019 146 159 10.1016/j.gene.2018.11.069 30472380 · DOI
  36. [39]Schene I.F. Joore I.P. Oka R. Mokry M. van Vugt A.H.M. van Boxtel R. van der Doef H.P.J. van der Laan L.J.W. Verstegen M.M.A. van Hasselt P.M. Prime editing for functional repair in patient-derived disease models Nat. Commun. 11 2020 5352 10.1038/s41467-020-19136-7 33097693 PMC7584657 · DOI
  37. [40]Caso F. Davies B. Base editing and prime editing in laboratory animals Lab. Anim. 56 2022 35 49 10.1177/0023677221993895 33596731 PMC8918876 · DOI
  38. [41]Happi Mbakam C. Rousseau J. Tremblay G. Yameogo P. Tremblay J.P. Prime Editing Permits the Introduction of Specific Mutations in the Gene Responsible for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 2022 6160 10.3390/ijms23116160 PMC9181224 35682838 · DOI
  39. [42]Hillary V.E. Ceasar S.A. Prime editing in plants and mammalian cells: Mechanism, achievements, limitations, and future prospects Bioessays 44 2022 e2200032 10.1002/bies.202200032 35750651 · DOI
  40. [43]Ahmad N. Awan M.J.A. Mansoor S. Improving editing efficiency of prime editor in plants Trends Plant Sci. 28 2023 1 3 10.1016/j.tplants.2022.09.001 36216710 · DOI
  41. [44]Zhao Z. Shang P. Mohanraju P. Geijsen N. Prime editing: advances and therapeutic applications Trends Biotechnol. 41 2023 1000 1012 10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.03.004 37002157 · DOI
  42. [45]Mathis N. Allam A. Kissling L. Marquart K.F. Schmidheini L. Solari C. Balázs Z. Krauthammer M. Schwank G. Predicting prime editing efficiency and product purity by deep learning Nat. Biotechnol. 2023 10.1038/s41587-022-01613-7 PMC7614945 36646933 · DOI
  43. [46]Tekel S.J. Brookhouser N. Standage-Beier K. Wang X. Brafman D.A. Cytosine and adenosine base editing in human pluripotent stem cells using transient reporters for editing enrichment Nat. Protoc. 16 2021 3596 3624 10.1038/s41596-021-00552-y 34172975 · DOI
  44. [48]Kluesner M.G. Nedveck D.A. Lahr W.S. Garbe J.R. Abrahante J.E. Webber B.R. Moriarity B.S. EditR: A Method to Quantify Base Editing from Sanger Sequencing CRISPR J 1 2018 239 250 10.1089/crispr.2018.0014 31021262 PMC6694769 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frisch, C., Kostes, W. W., Galyon, B., Whitman, B., Tekel, S. J., Standage-Beier, K., Srinivasan, G., Wang, X., & Brafman, D. A.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Brafman, David A.
Venue
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
33
Pages
483-492
ISSN
2162-2531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384564858
Cited by
9
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG056706, R21AG075612, R21AG079279)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM106081, R01GM121698)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB031893)
  • Alzheimer's Association
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Keywords
prime editing, pine, genome editing efficiency, indels, human cell lines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review