Cited by 455CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseDNA Repair Mechanisms

Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells

Open access
Yu, Chen, Liu, Yanxia, Ma, Tianhua, Liu, Kai, Xu, Shaohua, Zhang, Yu, Liu, Honglei, La Russa, Marie +3 more·2015·Cell stem cell

Abstract

The bacterial CRISPR-Cas9 system has emerged as an effective tool for sequence-specific gene knockout through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), but it remains inefficient for precise editing of genome sequences. Here we develop a reporter-based screening approach for high-throughput identification of chemical compounds that can modulate precise genome editing through homology-directed repair (HDR). Using our screening method, we have identified small molecules that can enhance CRISPR-mediated HDR efficiency, 3-fold for large fragment insertions and 9-fold for point mutations. Interestingly, we have also observed that a small molecule that inhibits HDR can enhance frame shift insertion and deletion (indel) mutations mediated by NHEJ. The identified small molecules function robustly in diverse cell types with minimal toxicity. The use of small molecules provides a simple and effective strategy to enhance precise genome engineering applications and facilitates the study of DNA repair mechanisms in mammalian cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.003

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An HDR enhancer and NHEJ inhibitor were used to improve homology-directed repair and efficient genome editing, particularly for precise single-nucleotide modifications.

    “An HDR enhancer and NHEJ inhibitor were used to improve homology-directed repair and efficient genome editing, particularly for precise single-nucleotide modifications (Figure 4A) [45,46].”

    From Precise CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12 Correction Using Lipoplexes in Retinal Models Derived from Patients with Inherited Retinal Dystrophies (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    In the passage on SNP editing (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable), L755507 increased precise A4V single-nucleotide editing in human iPS cells almost ninefold and reduced indel mutations. The paper does not report using a separate NHEJ inhibitor alongside an HDR enhancer; it describes L755507 as an HDR enhancer that also reduced indels. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The desired recombination efficacy of HDR often occurs infrequently, which presents enormous challenges for robust applications.

    “However, the desired recombination efficacy often occurs infrequently, which presents enormous challenges for robust applications [61, 82–84].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, C., Liu, Y., Ma, T., Liu, K., Xu, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., La Russa, M., Xie, M., Ding, S., & Qi, L. S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Gladstone Institutes (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ding, Sheng
  • Qi, Lei S.
Venue
Cell stem cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
142-147
ISSN
  • 1875-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-5909
OpenAlex
W2007594606
Cited by
455
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 26
FWCI
27.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell stem cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP5OD017887)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL107436)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA036858, R01DA036858)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P50GM081879, T32GM008568)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, small molecules, homology-directed repair, non-homologous end joining, genome editing efficiency, pluripotent stem cells, indel mutations, DNA repair, high-throughput screening
MeSH terms
DNA Repair, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Genetic Engineering, HeLa Cells, Humans, Structure-Activity Relationship, Molecular Structure, Genome, Human, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Small Molecule Libraries, High-Throughput Screening Assays, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review