The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Prevalence of Retinal Vein Occlusion: Pooled Data from Population Studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia
Open accessAbstract
Objective To summarize the prevalence of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) from studies in the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Design Pooled analysis using individual population-based data. Participants Individual participant data from population-based studies around the world that had ascertained RVO from fundus photographs. Methods Each study provided data on branch RVO and central RVO by age, sex, and ethnicity. Prevalence rates were directly age and sex standardized to the 2008 world population aged 30 years and older. Estimates were calculated by study and, after pooling, by ethnicity. Summary estimates included studies in which RVO was assessed from fundus photographs on ≥2 fields of both eyes. Main Outcome Measures Any RVO, CRVO, or BRVO. Results The combined pooled data contained 68,751 individuals from 15 studies, with participants’ ages ranging from 30 to 101 years. In analyses of 11 studies that assessed ≥2 fundus fields of both eyes (n=49,869), the age- and sex-standardized prevalence was 5.20 per 1000 (confidence interval [CI], 4.40–5.99) for any RVO, 4.42 per 1000 (CI, 3.65–5.19) for BRVO, and 0.80 per 1000 (CI, 0.61–0.99) for CRVO. Prevalence varied by race/ethnicity and increased with age, but did not differ by gender. The age- and sex-standardized prevalence of any RVO was 3.7 per 1000 (CI, 2.8–4.6) in whites (5 studies), 3.9 per 1000 (CI, 1.8–6.0) in blacks (1 study), 5.7 per 1000 (CI, 4.5–6.8) in Asians (6 studies), and 6.9 per 1000 (CI, 5.7–8.3) in Hispanics (3 studies). Prevalence for CRVO was lower than BRVO in all ethnic populations. On the basis of these data, an estimated 16.4 million (CI, 13.9–18.9) adults are affected by RVO, with 2.5 million (CI, 1.9–3.1) affected by CRVO and 13.9 million (CI, 11.5–16.4) affected by BRVO. Study limitations include non-uniform sampling frames in identifying study participants and in acquisition and grading of RVO data. Conclusions Our study provides summary data on the prevalence of RVO and suggests that approximately 16 million people may have this condition. Research on preventive and treatment strategies for this sight-threatening eye disease is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale.
Fried, L. P., Borhani, N. O., Enright, P., Furberg, C. D., Gardin, J. M., Kronmal, R. A., Kuller, L. H., Manolio, T. A., Mittelmark, M. B., Newman, A., et al. (1991) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-w · Cited by 3,652
Prevalence and Associations of Retinal Vein Occlusion in Australia: The Blue Mountains Eye Study
Mitchell, P. (1996) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140443012 · Cited by 545
Self-citationKlein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Knudtson, M. D., Wong, T. Y., Cotch, M. F., Liu, K., Burke, G., Saad, M. F., & Jacobs, D. R. (2006) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.013 · Cited by 399
Self-citationDiabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy in a Mexican-American Population
West, S. K., Klein, R., Rodriguez, J., Muñoz, B., Broman, A. T., Sanchez, R., & Snyder, R. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.7.1204 · Cited by 160
Population-Based Studies in Ophthalmology
Wong, T. Y., & Hyman, L. (2008) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.048 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Cited by
Klaassen, I., Van Noorden, C. J. F., & Schlingemann, R. O. (2013) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.02.001 · Cited by 722
Balaratnasingam, C., Inoue, M., Ahn, S., McCann, J., Dhrami-Gavazi, E., Yannuzzi, L. A., & Freund, K. B. (2016) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.008 · Cited by 367
Choi, J. Y., Yoo, T. K., Seo, J. G., Kwak, J., Um, T. T., & Rim, T. H. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187336 · Cited by 282
Fu, D. J., Mishra, A. V., Quek, C., Balaskas, K., Pontikos, N., Sim, D., Sivaprasad, S., & Faes, L. (2025) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-024-03529-9 · Cited by 14
Abraldes, M. J., Pareja, A., & Roura, M. (2016) · Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.oftale.2015.11.006 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, S., McIntosh, R. L., Cheung, N., Lim, L., Wang, J. J., Mitchell, P., Kowalski, J. W., Nguyen, H., & Wong, T. Y.
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 313-319.e1
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978704499
- Cited by
- 1,145
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 24.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Prevalence of Retinal Vein Occlusion: Pooled Data from Population Studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.017
- The paper
- Rogers, S., McIntosh, R. L., Cheung, N., Lim, L., Wang, J. J., Mitchell, P., Kowalski, J. W., Nguyen, H., & Wong, T. Y. (2010). The Prevalence of Retinal Vein Occlusion: Pooled Data from Population Studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.